Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tram station "Branko's bridge" in 2021 (Belgrade, Serbia).jpg

File:Tram station "Branko's bridge" in 2021 (Belgrade, Serbia).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2021 at 12:56:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Transport_infrastructure
Info Tram station "Branko's bridge" (Belgrade, Serbia) with tram No.2 (called Deuce). -- Mile (talk) 12:56, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 12:56, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Moving people 'ghosts' in tram car and on the street. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:53, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Info Charlesjsharp Sure, they can move, it is "Land of free home of the brave." --Mile (talk) 16:34, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Info And a photographer has the opportunity to take his photo when the free and the brave are not moving. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:37, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Not in Belgrade, you wont see it neither at 2 am. I removed those who spoiled look on the trams (walked out), but thoose inside do not bother my composition, neither bike rider on road (far left) or car (road on far right). That is long exposure, on public transport, people are part of it. --Mile (talk) 19:09, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 18:55, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 20:19, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:33, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Exciting perspective on an interesting tram station (combines serveral architectural styles). --Aristeas (talk) 09:19, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose An interesting picture, but it doesn't reach FP for me because it feels like the underside of the bridge and the tram station are fighting each other to be the subject of the image. Daniel Case (talk) 18:46, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas and Daniel(!) To me, it's the combination of the underside of the bridge and the trams that makes the composition. In other words, I think I see what appealed to Mile when he shot this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:41, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment talk, Ikan Kekek I see a good harmony between the elements (metal construction, stone beam, tram). I like composition very much, as did User:Mosbatho when on QI ("Excellent composition"). You dont have to lock on one subject, sometime you have to "Think outside the box". If i would do a reshot, i would do same compo, just add some traffic lights on bypassing traffic (cars). It is still in category Transport-Transport infrastructure. --Mile (talk) 13:24, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I agree. Among other things, part of the underside of the bridge provides excellent leading lines toward the tram stop. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:39, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support I appreciate the composition. --Mosbatho (talk) 18:06, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose due to the ugly ceiling Poco a poco (talk) 20:09, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special, normal good image. -- Karelj (talk) 20:41, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Transport#Transport_infrastructure