Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tres amigos.jpg
File:Tres amigos.jpg, featured edit
Voting period ends on 25 Feb 2009 at 17:56:52
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:56, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support Three friends waiting for breakfast in San Carlos, Sonora, Mexico... -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:56, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support The composition is solid and the sharp textures of the birds and their perch is nicely offset by the softness of the background. I also like the dashes of red clustered in the top half of the image offset by the splashes of white in the bottom half, with the seagull bridging the two areas. With that said, the frontmost pelican appears to be slightly out of focus, so I give support with some reservation. -Notyourbroom (talk) 18:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support--Umnik (talk) 20:25, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support ■ MMXXtalk 21:37, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support Nice. --Lošmi (talk) 22:11, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support--Kuvaly (talk) 15:16, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
OpposePlease check id of the gull, it is NOT a Larus occidentalis. Lycaon (talk) 17:50, 17 February 2009 (UTC)- Info possibly Heermann's Gull !? bamse (talk) 14:35, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- That's more likely, thanks. And now for the pelican ;-), which is NOT a Pelicanus crispus. Lycaon (talk) 14:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Well... they are birds at least... feel free to correct description... I am not a birdologist... ;o) --Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:22, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- That would be the occidentalis ;-), winter plumage I guess. bamse (talk) 22:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks Bamse... changed description on both... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:22, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- That would be the occidentalis ;-), winter plumage I guess. bamse (talk) 22:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Well... they are birds at least... feel free to correct description... I am not a birdologist... ;o) --Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:22, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- That's more likely, thanks. And now for the pelican ;-), which is NOT a Pelicanus crispus. Lycaon (talk) 14:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Info possibly Heermann's Gull !? bamse (talk) 14:35, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Mbz1 (talk) 01:18, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Still have to oppose, not for id (anymore) and not for composition, but for unfortunate DOF. The two pelicans are OOF while the gull is (looks) oversharpened. Lycaon (talk) 21:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Karel (talk) 08:46, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Distracting background. —kallerna™ 18:59, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Background. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:48, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
SupportTres amigos, such a great idea! Samulili (talk) 17:44, 26 February 2009 (UTC)OpposeIntersting, but the background spoils it. Crapload (talk) 01:44, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, too late. -)--Mywood (talk) 12:05, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Mywood (talk) 12:05, 27 February 2009 (UTC)