Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vincent van Gogh - Irises (1889).jpg

File:Vincent van Gogh - Irises (1889).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2016 at 11:37:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
Info created by Vincent van Gogh / J. Paul Getty Museum, uploaded by Revent, nominated by Yann (talk) 11:37, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Don't open the file in your browser. ;) -- Yann (talk) 11:37, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 12:19, 18 January 2016 (UTC) It needed almost 80 seconds to open it.[reply]
Support - I haven't seen this recently enough to be positive about the colors, but I'll trust them on this. The resolution of this picture is remarkable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:20, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support INeverCry 18:57, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:36, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:48, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:34, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:54, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- Pierre André (talk) 16:19, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:31, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:29, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I was tempted to nominate this when uploading it, and only did not because Irises-Vincent van Gogh.jpg, at somewhat higher resolution, is an existing enwiki FP. I actually think think this is a better image.. it seems to my view to be a better focus, though somewhat lower resolution, and a slightly narrower framing. I'd ask people (even those who already 'voted') to critically compare them and reconsider, tho... while I think this is better, it's definitely worth comparing one to the other. Revent (talk) 07:50, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Thank you. I agree with you: The image nominated above is in better focus than the other one. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:38, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Revent, I compared both before nominating this. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:44, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Pofka (talk) 17:44, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 14:41, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media