Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vincent van Gogh - Starry Night - Google Art Project.jpg

File:Vincent van Gogh - Starry Night - Google Art Project.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2015 at 19:48:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Starry Night Over the Rhone, by Vicent van Gogh. Created by Google Cultural Institute - uploaded by Dcoetzee (Bot) - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:48, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:48, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:26, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support How we can vote oppose in any art picture? --The_Photographer (talk) 13:04, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@The Photographer: Next FP Nomination: File:Hans Holbein the Younger - The Ambassadors - Google Art Project.jpg. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:32, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If all art painting are FP then non of those pictures are really FP, because the art is invaluable --The_Photographer (talk) 14:41, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The point in these cases is not to judge the painting itself but the quality of its reproduction: resolution, contrast, brightness, color fidelity, etc. Imo

In this case I don't remember the real painting, so I won't vote. Sting (talk) 23:17, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Yann (talk) 15:07, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:02, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 17:34, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support And 7...--LivioAndronico talk 20:05, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:59, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Too dark! The sky is grey, but it is blue in reality.--Paris 16 (talk) 17:41, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't remember the original painting, but the lighting is really not ideal in my opinion. Some of the protruding features even cast strong shadows on the surface. A little bit of light from above to highlight the texture is ok, but this seems to be lit almost entirely from above. — Julian H.^✈ 06:26, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We dont want change "original" colors and light --The_Photographer (talk) 16:11, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well I think it should be changed here for a good reproduction. — Julian H.^✈ 16:47, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Colors and light are created in our brain, not from an untouchable reality. The range of light and colors, is built on the configuration of each mind. What I'm trying to say is that there is a correct representation of this work, however nobody can know more than the author. The senses are exposed and create an alternate reality that differs every human being in this world, realities, however, intersect never actually touch, there is no way I will be able to see how you see the world. A world that sometimes is a reflection of our own memories, experiences, ourselves. I'm not refuting your comment, simply a reflection. --The_Photographer (talk) 17:43, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's just that whether or not the light source is small and located above the painting is a rather objective thing. — Julian H.^✈ 09:54, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per above.--Paris 16 (talk) 11:05, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /KTC (talk) 12:25, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media