Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vistas desde la iglesia de San Pedro, Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-07, DD 01.JPG

File:Vistas desde la iglesia de San Pedro, Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-07, DD 01.JPG, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2013 at 18:51:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info View of the Railway Bridge from Saint Peter's church, an iron bridge over the Duagava river in Riga, capital of Latvia. The current bridge of a length of 328m was inaugurated in 1914 and rebuilt after the World Wars. All by me, Poc o² 18:51, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 18:51, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMO it would maybe be a little better with a little more of highlights in the sky however it is not bad like that and I like the compo -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:14, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Estoy de acuerdo con el comentario de Christian, algunas zonas del río se observan grises en lugar de blancas. Hubiera sido deseable más nitidez, sin embargo, en MHO, esta imagen no solo debe ser destacada, sino también, nominada a VI. Un abrazo --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 20:35, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Composition and motive is interesting. But for me the light is not good enough for an FP. The sky in general looks seldom appealing in near back light situations (besides sunset). The file description is imho irritating. From the photo I had not concluded that the bridge is the main motive. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:40, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- This is a very good picture but the lighting is far from the FP level, as stated by Tuxyso. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:32, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jean-Éric Poclain (talk) 08:34, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but I agree with Tuxyso and Alvesgaspar. Midday backlight (solar noon was back then at 13:30 and you took the shoot at 14:01) was not a good choice. Light conditions would have been much better at evening. --Ivar (talk) 08:40, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:22, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Michael Barera (talk) 05:50, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the composition, it's a kind of zig-zag that leads to the horizon with the bridge in the middle. --Kadellar (talk) 11:05, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The light almost hides the bridge in a low-contrast area. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 11:38, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the picture is okay, for sure QI, but not featureable --Wladyslaw (talk) 12:46, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
weak support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:33, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nixón (wop!) 02:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 22:34, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes