Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Volkswagen Type 2, Brazil.jpg

File:Volkswagen Type 2, Brazil.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2016 at 01:05:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles
Info All by -- The Photographer 01:05, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The bug is interesting, but the road isn't. Perhaps a much closer bottom crop might impel me to support, though I'm not totally sure. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:17, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:15, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The van is OK, but very bright. Looking at it at full size hurts my eyes a bit. As Ikan says, there's too much road as well. This is interesting to me, but not really wowing. lNeverCry 07:13, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan and Cry The footer have the same size than the header and if I change it the composition could became unbalanced, I think so, what do you think? --The Photographer 13:21, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, as stated above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:18, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Sorry, cool car/bus/bug but the interest it evokes does not result in a wow for me, and it doesn't make up for the tech flaws already mentioned, too glary, too much road (the removal of some would not unbalance the pic IMO) and for a normal photo of a stationary object it is a tad too grainy. There are also the cut red car and the cut green parasol. I keep wanting to move the camera about 40 cm to the right or something for a better composition. cart-Talk 17:20, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others, --Karelj (talk) 21:40, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others, potentially interesting van with overly distracting background. Daniel Case (talk) 20:05, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks everybody for the votes of support and oppose, and reviews. --The Photographer 22:09, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /lNeverCry 01:37, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]