Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:WTB 20220723 Ulrichsberg Aussichtsturm Alpenblick 9792.jpg

File:WTB 20220723 Ulrichsberg Aussichtsturm Alpenblick 9792.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2023 at 10:00:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Austria
Info The stairs of the observation tower Alpenblick in Ulrichsberg, Upper Austria, seem from the basement of the tower. Created and uploaded by Z thomas, edited by Ailura, nominated by --Aristeas (talk) 10:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support We have some featured picures of staircases, but most of them belong to castles, churches or expensive office buildings. This one is different: I was fascinated by this view of the stairs of an observation tower, a solid construction from mighty beams. When looking at it in detail, please consider that because of the extreme differences in depth it is impossible to get everything tack sharp. The symmetry of the original photo was diminished a bit by that board at the right, therefore I have nominated this cropped version, because here at FPC we usually love symmetry; but if you prefer the original, please just state so, we can switch the nomination to the original. --Aristeas (talk) 10:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's another great find. But I actually prefer the original because of its wider format and the fact it fills your vision better, especially since most now have widescreens. The board isn't that ~~detracting~~ distracting in my opinion, so maybe it should be offered as an alternative. - Benh (talk) 10:57, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The original metadata would be interesting but are unfortunately not included. I also like the original version of the image better.--Ermell (talk) 11:57, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Info Thank you for your reviews, Benh and Ermell. As both of you prefer the original, it seems that my concern about lack of symmetry was superficial ;–). We are still in an early state of the nomination, so I have just switched the nomination to the original (uncropped) version of the photo and hope this is OK for everybody. If somebody prefers the cropped version, we can still offer it as an alternative version. Sorry for the confusion and thanks, --Aristeas (talk) 13:02, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:30, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like both versions, can I get both? ;) --Kritzolina (talk) 17:56, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Well, actually you can, both files are readily available for you here on Commons … ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 05:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Despite the disclaimer, the sharpness is actually impressive to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:05, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The original meta data had to be stripped: they contained my name as the photo was shot using my camera. --Granada (talk) 19:20, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank you for the explanation! --Aristeas (talk) 05:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
exiftool, Lightroom or probably any other decent editing software lets one remove only the author :) - Benh (talk) 09:51, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:42, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking view. The material and colors have charm. Agree with Benh and Ermell the original is more impressive, due to the left part that gives volume / relief in my opinion, in addition to the attractive center. The DoF is excellent. Too bad the exif had to be stripped, otherwise it would have been interesting to know the focal length and F-number (if not stacked image) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:23, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 455528 06:41, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Suggests the climax of Vertigo. Daniel Case (talk) 06:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:41, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:00, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:16, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:43, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:33, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 15:37, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:17, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:04, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:31, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 15:36, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 20:51, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very special to me. --Yann (talk) 22:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 05:40, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:40, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 12:43, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 27 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:39, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Austria