Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Webysther 20131026172834 - Rocha com algas e ouriço-do-mar.jpg

File:Webysther 20131026172834 - Rocha com algas e ouriço-do-mar.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2015 at 20:04:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
Info created by Webysther - uploaded by Webysther - nominated by Webysther -- Webysther (talk) 20:04, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Webysther (talk) 20:04, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  Oppose Very beautiful, but unfortunately blurred ~~and the water on the right is overexposed~~. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:13, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@King of Hearts and Webysther: It's fixable? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 02:33, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Overexposed is simple to fix, if the data is in raw, give me one day to see this. About blurred i do no, because the long exp. cause this, water move the plants. -- Webysther (talk) 10:38, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  Done Overexposed fixed. -- Webysther (talk) 10:58, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Webysther: A exposição não ficou boa. O melhor seria que a água à direita voltasse ao normal assim: [1]. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:25, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  Done @ArionEstar: Applied over the raw the fixed, the quality is really better. -- Webysther (talk) 02:26, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Color is better but unsharpness remains. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sharpness is acceptable for a difficult moment for shooting, IMHO. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's kinda good idea but not the wow idea, IMO. --Laitche (talk) 14:44, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Good idea, but has technical problems. --Tremonist (talk) 12:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose good for IQ, not the wow idea, IMO. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 13:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For me it lacks some interesting focal point that the eye can rest on. The moss is not of sufficient interest in itself to fulfil that role. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:50, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 11:11, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Michael Maggs. Composition not working for me either. -- Colin (talk) 11:16, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:14, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]