Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Weil am Rhein - Dreiländerbrücke9.jpg
File:Weil am Rhein - Dreiländerbrücke9.jpg, featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 May 2011 at 09:13:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info all by Wladyslaw, remake of my picture File:Dreilaenderbruecke 002.jpg which already was nominated this year -- Wladyslaw (talk) 09:13, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 09:13, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support very nice --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 10:34, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Snaevar (talk) 13:00, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 14:48, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:04, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 22:22, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- Weak support Although prefer the 2007 version which is warmer, less symmetric, better illustration of human scale and does not have the latest high-rise on the left overlapping with the cables. In any case your sustained effort to illustrate this bridge is much appreciated. --ELEKHHT 01:24, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Tomer T 11:33, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
- Please could you explain why ? It is not a mandatory, but in case of "oppose" votes, it is very appreciated and useful for others. Thank you.--Jebulon (talk) 15:04, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- It is technically good, but I don't find it attractive or interesting. Tomer T (talk) 18:31, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- but this one File:BMW 840 Ci Sport front.jpg seems to be very attractive and interesting to you. very curious --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:38, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- I don't see the contradiction. Tomer T (talk) 17:12, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- but this one File:BMW 840 Ci Sport front.jpg seems to be very attractive and interesting to you. very curious --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:38, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- It is technically good, but I don't find it attractive or interesting. Tomer T (talk) 18:31, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- Please could you explain why ? It is not a mandatory, but in case of "oppose" votes, it is very appreciated and useful for others. Thank you.--Jebulon (talk) 15:04, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose per Tomer T. - Benh (talk) 16:52, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support not per Tomer and Benh, personal aversion for a theme should not be the reason for opposing, but real facts --Llez (talk) 17:47, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support • Richard • [®] • 17:44, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support Good colors and perspective. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:01, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose per Tomer T. W.S. 11:48, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture