Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wilno -katedra - sw. Helena.JPG

File:Wilno -katedra - sw. Helena.JPG, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2010 at 12:23:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Albertus teolog -- Albertus teolog (talk) 12:23, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 12:23, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nicolas M. Perrault (talk) 12:33, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overexposed –hover Fly | chat? 14:59, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I made some corrections, see File:Wilno -katedra - sw. Helena-CN.jpg. Maybe it's a bit better and you will nominate it as alternative. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:08, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The new version is better but still not featured quality. Athyllis (talk) 19:08, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Always the same questions: why two chances for this image ? Is the alt version a new nomination (and what about the limit of two nominations by user ?) ? For which pic are we voting ? Where must I vote, here or below ?--Jebulon (talk) 09:56, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment In this case the nominations are by different users. You can vote for or against either or both pictures, but because they are alternatives, even if both votes succeed, only one will be promoted (the one with the greatest number of supports). 99of9 (talk) 00:25, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose lighting could be better. Snowmanradio (talk) 19:58, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alt edit

Info edited by kaʁstn --IdLoveOne (talk) 17:46, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support better.. --IdLoveOne (talk) 18:46, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose lighting could be better. Snowmanradio (talk) 19:58, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:01, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]