Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zeche-Hasenwinkel-Maschinenhaus-2021.jpg

File:Zeche-Hasenwinkel-Maschinenhaus-2021.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2021 at 06:40:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
Info all by Tuxyso This photo shows the engine house of former coal mine Zeche Hasenwinkel in Bochum (Germany). -- Tuxyso (talk) 06:40, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support I could photograph from a small embankment very close to the building for a more interesting (higher above ground) shooting position. There was imho also favorable light. I look forward to your comments-- Tuxyso (talk) 06:40, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice image, but the building looks strange, leaning. Composition not so good.--Mile (talk) 07:41, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Thanks for your review. Could you please specify what is leaning, Mile. I used the internal leveler of my camera and very slight fine corrections in post. I've checked again: Every vertical is perfectly straight. Probably the slight higher shooting positions (above ground on an embankment) misleads you with your judgement? --Tuxyso (talk) 07:54, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Done. PD corection made top much biger in size than botom. --Mile (talk) 08:06, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Mile, the part you've marked is perfectly straight (please check that with a higher resolution, see here) As mentioned: my post-editing was VERY moderate, for illustration purposes I've uploaded the out-of-camera original (without further editing). --Tuxyso (talk) 08:32, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I removed my vote. --Mile (talk) 08:47, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:12, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not sure whether this building is interesting enough for an FP, but the shapes of the foliage distract my eyes and cause this not to be a great composition, in my opinion, and the shadows don't help in this case, either. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:17, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- What do you mean by shape of the foiliage, Ikan Kekek? The shadows of the branches on the Building? —Tuxyso (talk) 22:06, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The trees themselves (literally, their leaves, but also the branches). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:35, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Ikan --iMahesh (talk) 15:16, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per ikan --Andrei (talk) 17:52, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. --Basotxerri (talk) 20:41, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice building but I agree with Ikan, the shadows falling on the building tend to make the composition a bit overly complex and unsatisfying. Cmao20 (talk) 16:38, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support To be honest, I like it, especially with the complex pattern the shadows draw on the building. But I agree that this really is a matter of taste. --Aristeas (talk) 09:18, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's not just the trees that distract, per Ikan, it's the shadows of the trees on the building, otherwise framed at a very nice three-quarters angle. Daniel Case (talk) 14:59, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with above. Other than that it's still very nice documentary image of this building to have in Commons, and good quality. --Ximonic (talk) 12:17, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support I somehow like the scenery. --Mosbatho (talk) 09:47, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:25, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]