Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zuzana Smatanova-2014.jpg
File:Zuzana Smatanova-2014.jpg, not featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Aug 2014 at 19:21:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Bojars - uploaded by Bojars - nominated by Bojars -- Bojars (talk) 19:21, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Bojars (talk) 19:21, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Oppose I think it is pretty decent concert photo, but the artist appears for me lack the kind of concentration/charisma/expression, which I expect for it to reach FP level, like these two recent concert FPs, for example. --Slaunger (talk) 20:38, 29 July 2014 (UTC)- Oppose Dman41689 (talk) 06:55, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose per Slaunger -- Christian Ferrer Talk 11:03, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- For me: too many people are opose. Many of them are categorical oppose: "without the words..." if I can compare other pictures submissions for music perfomance, I thought that from the last time this is best one... I have done many written Slovak articles about music for Wikipedia, but here are no many amateurish pictures about them with better qouality: "better" in general no better that this one... thank you for new experience: voting here is not about voting for articles submissions' quality, this is almost for artistic photographers' support only... vaste time for me... candidate of amateur reporting photo here is mistake. Bye. --Bojars (talk) 06:00, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
- Bojars I am sorry if nominating a photo here has been a bad experience for you. It is less than 0.1 % of all photos on Commons, which end up being featured. So getting the opposes is not a shame. It has happened to most frequent nominators here. There is another image recognition project on Commons, Commons:Valued images, which recognise getting that good illustration for a specific topic or article (which this photo is, it is clearly better than average photos on Commons). You may want to have a look at that - and hopefully come back, when you get that fantastic concert shot with a great wow and expression. -- Slaunger (talk) 21:55, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
- For me: too many people are opose. Many of them are categorical oppose: "without the words..." if I can compare other pictures submissions for music perfomance, I thought that from the last time this is best one... I have done many written Slovak articles about music for Wikipedia, but here are no many amateurish pictures about them with better qouality: "better" in general no better that this one... thank you for new experience: voting here is not about voting for articles submissions' quality, this is almost for artistic photographers' support only... vaste time for me... candidate of amateur reporting photo here is mistake. Bye. --Bojars (talk) 06:00, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
- I absolutly agree with you, Slaunger. You are one of those, who gave answer/ comment for "oppose". This is clear and uderstable... (and for my poor English knowledge too). For my acceptation of working/ uploadind to Wikimedia Commons is: "how many from my uploads are used in Wiki projects?". And there are over 90% of them... and that is another motivation. --Bojars (talk) 07:44, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 22:42, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
