Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:İzmir yangın 3.JPG

Image:İzmir yangın 3.JPG, not featured edit

Info created by Vikimach - uploaded by Vikimach - nominated by White Cat -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 09:50, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Image displays an on going fire at en:Izmir. -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 09:50, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
~~Support~~ TrafoberkPlease log in to vote. --Digon3 ^talk 13:15, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Actual event and very good job, I think. --Maderibeyza 12:23, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bergwolf 16:33, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The picture is unsharp and the colours somehow washed out. Alvesgaspar 17:24, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I want to support this, but it has a lot of artefacts in the smoke. Can anything be done to clean it up? Adam Cuerden 18:44, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I took photo, uploaded my computer and uploaded commons in same time, except this. I didn't use any software--Machiavelli ^talk 19:41, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I didn't mean you did anything wrong. Just that it might look better if someone with software poked at it a little. Adam Cuerden 22:42, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, just little information.:)--Machiavelli ^talk 08:27, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support the image is unsharp, but it's a great composition. --Christoph Michels 20:49, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting shot. But the "forest fire" only shown by a cloud. Technically isn't excellent too. Sorry --Beyond silence 22:16, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Danbury 11:13, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the composition. Dori | Talk 07:23, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very interesting, but fringing artefacts visible, and not sharp. --MichaelMaggs 17:11, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As Beyond silence and MichaelMaggs. Lycaon 05:36, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ddenkel 07:54, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support it's interesting for bad architecture and bad fire time --Alperx 08:36, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Air Support is ready General KIZILSUNGUR 09:25, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Uannis 10:51, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I think the alleged lack of quality is probably the side effect of the smoke obstructing the sunlight. "Correcting" it digitally would reduce image quality as it would no longer be realistic. -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 11:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Comment The reason for bad quality is not relevant, it is the result that counts. BTW, what with the last 4 supporting votes who only ever seem to have voted for this (and one more picture) ever. Smells like sockpuppetry... Lycaon 11:22, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment I see that some unactive users supporting these two pictures. These two pictures especially the other one are discussed too much in Turkish wikipedia, for this reason these people need support them, I think. No sockpuppetry but these votes aren't healthy ok. I accept that the other one has some bad flash and lighting problems, but this picture can be featured, I think. I'm a new user in commons and don't know much about featured pictures. But I believe this photo has specialities for being featured. --Maderibeyza 07:34, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - Comment well its look likes Türkish Wikipedia here.Someone looking to under the ox for heifer. I'm not puppet. I'm real one. when I want I can come to here and I can use my vote...--Alperx 08:42, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ack opposers --Simonizer 11:36, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Ack Simonizer ;) --Richard Bartz 19:00, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 20:36, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]