Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Dschwen. Please check the full size version. I nominate it for the documentary character, showing various signs of use-wear on a circulation coin. The picture was created using a linear-macro-panorama technique, stitched together from 16 individual pictures. One pixel corresponds to 10x10 microns. --Dschwen12:36, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice technike how you made that picture. You can see every detail of that coin, but i find this coin not special enough to be FP. If you have a more interesting and maybe historical valuable coin that would be a suiteable candidate for FP nomination. Sorry! --SvonHalenbach20:08, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose congrats to this technically surprising picture. I see no tilt too but there is too much dust on the coin that could have easily be blown away. --Ikiwaner15:38, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose-you didnt chose the best coin of all do you? i do not mind for the tilt but i would wonder if there was a cleaner coin. after all it is only from 1990-LadyofHats21:03, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the coin was not chosen for cleanliness etc., the whole point was to get a picture of an average worn circulation coin, as a cointerpoint to all the perfect shiny photoshopped collectible proof coins from the US mint website. The coin is straight from my change purse (yep I had a US cent in there), the dust is apparently purse-lint. --Dschwen21:30, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The shasow and the bg are indeed painted over. The fake shadow follows the outlines of the original shadow, but the original bg showed lots of paper pulp and fiber detail and was too distracting. --Dschwen08:07, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]