Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Argynnis adippe 2 Richard Bartz.jpg

Info created & nominated by --Richard Bartz 00:48, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Richard Bartz 00:48, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good work. Hint: Separate the antennae from the background a little more (brighten the background). At the moment the antennae looks a bit confusing when displaying in thumbnail size. --TM 11:45, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful, nice composition. Chmehl 16:02, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I dont like the background. Its distracting in my opinion --Simonizer 16:34, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support--B.navez 19:26, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow factor, e.g. nothing special. --Karelj 19:28, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer 20:39, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but artificial background. -- Laitche 20:45, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I also dislike the background. /Daniel78 00:29, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. Pengo 10:25, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support, nice composition, colours. --Aqwis 12:46, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Richard - you are to blame for raising the bar this high with your previous images. --MichaelMaggs 22:49, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question Would you like to be judged the background as a painting? I mean that you intentionally made the background like as a painting. -- Laitche 07:47, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a lens effect displaying a play of light on leaves in a forrest glade which you can see here, too. Through color/contrast tweaking you can strengthen this effect which causes interesting and sometimes abstract results. Shurely a matter of taste because its experimental--Richard Bartz 09:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Thanks. I like the background's lens effect which looks like impressionist painting like this one :) -- Laitche 10:44, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination I will nominate a upright format (taxo picture) which should be more capable --Richard Bartz 09:37, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]