Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Atlantis launch plume edit.jpg

Image:Atlantis launch plume edit.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2008 at 00:06:07

Info created by ~~Fir0002~~w:NASA - uploaded by Fir0002 - nominated by neighbours564eva -- Neighbours564eva (talk) 00:06, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Neighbours564eva (talk) 00:06, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lošmi (talk) 02:14, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OMG! --Mr. Mario (talk) 03:44, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support ! →Diti the penguin — 07:58, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor quality. --Kosiarz-PL 13:25, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Idem as Kosiarz. Quote from the guidelines: "Pictures being nominated should be of high technical quality." This is not. _{No anonymous votes. --Mr. Mario (talk) 15:11, 9 December 2008 (UTC)}[reply]
Oppose, no double standards, please. --Aqwis (talk) 14:33, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Idem as Kosiarz. Quote from the guidelines: "Pictures being nominated should be of high technical quality." This is not. (Varcos (talk) 16:58, 9 December 2008 (UTC))[reply]
Info Discussion moved to here --Richard Bartz (talk) 19:03, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support can't see a quality problem - Chris DHDR 17:07, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 22:47, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose JalalV (talk) 04:17, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - As previous opposers. Maybe it has a chance as a Valued image. As for Mila comments, it would be nice to see you back, as a creator and a reviewer. Criticizing the evaluations of the other reviewers is not nice role for you. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:14, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Alvesgaspar. I did not criticize anybody. I just stated my opinion, that's all.What is really not nice it is you using the words "not nice" with no reason whatsoever--Mbz1 (talk) 15:04, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Latzel (talk) 14:47, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think this image has enough wow factor to overcome the technical issues. --J.smith (talk) 23:37, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It looks spectacular but the quality is not good enough. --Estrilda (talk) 07:52, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Pom² (talk) 14:33, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]