Info created by Tomas Castelazo - uploaded by Tomas Castelazo - nominated by Tomascastelazo 18:32, 6 June 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support --Tomascastelazo 18:32, 6 June 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose low res, is this supposed to be a picture of these flowers? Then they should be identified and put in an appropriate category. If it's supposed to be a picture of the coast (they should be identified as well ;)) but then the flowers use too much space on the picture. -- Gorgo 18:58, 6 June 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose "Permission: Larger version available upon request for a fee" --Rodge 19:31, 6 June 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support very nice. Resolution could be higher norro 19:41, 6 June 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Neutral ++colors, +DOF; -same as Rodge! Plumper 21:14, 6 June 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose - resolution - YolanC 21:59, 6 June 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose low resolution --Artefacto 22:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose too low resolution, strange composition Ss181292 05:08, 7 June 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Neutral I agree with norro --Luc Viatour 11:13, 7 June 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose --Huebi 20:02, 7 June 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose --ßøuñçê Y2K 13:56, 10 June 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose -- Get_It (Talk ) 14:25, 13 June 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support but for the artistic value of the image. There's a certain irony. The mountains are supposed to be blurry... Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 00:50, 14 June 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose awful resolution -Quasipalm 21:48, 19 June 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Result: 3 Support , 9 Oppose and 2 Neutral => not featured. --Lycaon 08:46, 28 June 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]