Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:British Columbia Parliament Buildings - Pano - HDR.jpg

Info created by H - uploaded by H - nominated by H (Same as w:User:HighInBC and User:HighInBC [1]) --HighInBC 13:49, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Self nom. HighInBC 13:49, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Neutral Because of the alternating bands in the sky and minor stitching errors. It is great stitching for 60 picture, good job! --Digon3 16:04, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fix alternating bands in the sky and I'll support, the stitching errors are not very noticable. --Digon3 16:18, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I agree, it is an impressive image but the sky is not good enough for a FP. /Daniel78 16:06, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you folks look at the full sized version? If the sky is that big of a deal I will just retake it another time, but the sky is not really the subject of photo. I am confused as to what makes a FP here, I see some very poor images passing and some very good ones failing. HighInBC 16:27, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I looked very carefully at full size before I voted and it is an amazing picture. I suspect no one is voting only because of the bands in the sky. For me the bands are really distracting and unnatural. As for poor images passing and some very good ones failing, well, no one understands that (but it probably has to do with new voters not reading the guidelines well enough and thinking this is Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, oh well). Definitely fix the bands in the sky or retake the picture (if you have to) and I am sure this will get lots of support votes. --Digon3 16:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fullsize, yes. And I will definitely support if the sky is fixed. /Daniel78 17:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. (Rule of the 5th day) Simonizer 08:33, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]