Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Broadway tower edit.jpg

Image:Broadway tower Edit1.jpg edit

Info created by Newton2 - uploaded by Arad - nominated by Arad --Arad 13:40, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Arad 13:40, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would look much better without any people in the picture. --Digon3 13:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, IMO, I think they are very useful. They give a sens of scale plus their shirt have a nice composition with the image (the woman in red and the man in blue). I strongly prefer the image with them in it. --Arad 14:03, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support I agree with Arad. ---donald- 16:05, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fantastic. Witty lama 16:09, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support A good one. I just wonder if it would be even better with the man on the left removed. Perhaps it would create a composition where you have a single tower and single human, almost perfectly alligned for about the same distance from the images edges. In any case, deserves support. --Thermos 16:33, 14 April 2007 (UTC)Changed support to edit 2--Thermos 11:01, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support very interesting --Winiar^✉ 16:45, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Info as may be guessed, original nomination is an edit which removes a light source behind a window and a white flag. I added an alternative from en wikipedia (where it is also FP candidate) which doesn't have these edits and has one person removed. Benh 19:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - ditto to Digon3; colours also look a little over-saturated - MPF 20:17, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ditto to MPF, clearly oversaturated. -- Dennis Wood 21:06, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - unnecessary removal of elements of the subject. The white thing is part of the guttering system, not a flag. --Yummifruitbat 21:36, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Arad on scale/tourist argument, Ack MPF on saturation, this pic looks like out of disneyland, I like Image:Broadway-tower-cotswolds.jpg better. Thanks to WindowsXp Bliss wallpaper, this scheme is a bit boring now ;) --Spundun 22:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 20:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edited Version Center, not featured edit

Guttering, interior light and one tourist cloned out.

Oppose - per my objection to Arad's first edit. --Yummifruitbat 21:36, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Arad 22:14, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - as per 1st version - MPF 20:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- As per 1st version -Spundun 22:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 20:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit 2 right, featured edit

Info above original nomination is an edit which removes a light source behind a window and a white flag. This alternative from en wikipedia (where it is also FP candidate) doesn't have these edits and has one person removed. Benh 19:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I support alternative version which I believe has a more dramatic aspect. Benh 19:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Oversaturated. -- Dennis Wood 21:08, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Distracting white flags and red light. --Arad 21:15, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Great shot; saturation perhaps a little high but not unpleasantly so. The colours are attractive without being garish. --Yummifruitbat 21:36, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ack Benh. --Thermos 10:58, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support like Benh & other(s) --Packa 12:38, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj 21:19, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Simonizer 07:07, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Atoma 11:51, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support better --Digon3 13:41, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Amazing picture. However, the human presence only serves to fool the viewer about the scale of the building because the woman is closer to the observer. Alvesgaspar 11:39, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Leafnode 06:28, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Lycaon 08:52, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - as per 1st version - MPF 20:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- As per 1st version -Spundun 22:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Lerdsuwa 14:58, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Malene Thyssen 18:28, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 13 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer 20:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]