Oppose -- Visible JPEG artifacts. If the resolution was lowered slightly say 1280px, plus a despeckle filter, it would reduce its effects substantially. ADSR6581 20:42, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I don't understand... There's a lot of pictures not supported because of their too low resolution (I don't understand to which use the resolution of the pictures MUST be very high)... and for this one the resolution should be lowered? El Comandante 01:18, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Your picture has a high resolution 1536x2048, so reducing it to, for example 1280x1708 won't make much difference. When we oppose a picture with low resolution, we are talking less than 800 pixels wide (or thereabouts). Was the picture straight from your camera, or did you save it with a low JPEG compression setting in your graphics program? If the original is of higher quality, then you can re-upload it. The maximum file size for any picture is 2 megabytes. It is a great picture, if it wasn't for the annoying artifacting. ADSR6581 10:45, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support Trés bien!!!! --PedroPVZ 17:29, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Neutral - I think it might look better if the bottom was cropped -- Joolz 19:44, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support (weak) I agree that the compression is too high, but I would never give up resolution; I'd like to see the original. --Tysto 22:20, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Nominate
Oppose - Rex 23:58, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Support LoopZilla 08:21, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Neutral - I think it might look better if the bottom was cropped -- Joolz 19:44, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)