Info created by Lmbuga - uploaded by Lmbuga - nominated by --80.39.180.97 10:47, 17 April 2007 (UTC) --[ reply ]
Support I like it --Simonizer 11:26, 17 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Weak Support . I like it too. Regards, Ben Aveling 11:39, 17 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support . Yes, I like so much.--Pedroserafin 12:16, 17 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support - Alvesgaspar 14:03, 17 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support - User:Vassil 17 April 2007
Support --libertad0 17:50, 17 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support --Winiar ✉ 19:36, 17 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support --Belmonte77 23:06, 17 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support -- Lycaon 21:17, 18 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Neutral {Oppose}} - nice enough pic, but rather low resolution, only 344 KB, with consequent jpeg compression faults ; also top of bridge cut off - MPF 21:06, 19 April 2007 (UTC) -- changed to neutral as low res no longer applies - MPF 18:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose -- Nothing special --Spundun 21:25, 19 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose not high res enough, 344 KB not enough for 1632x1224 --wj32 talk | contribs 05:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose per MPF. --MichaelMaggs 06:19, 20 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose - Looks better in thumbnail than in full view - Husky (talk to me ) 00:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support - Improved resolution version is even better --Tony Wills 01:27, 21 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose Good tech quality, but compositionally narrow in terms of cut bridge & crop in general. Ziga 13:43, 21 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support --Jeses 22:56, 21 April 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose per MPF --Jklamo 19:14, 1 May 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
result: 11 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 07:09, 2 May 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]