QuestionCould you explanin me (and probably many others), what you mean with word oversharpened? And from which did you recognize, that picture is oversharpened? --Karelj22:25, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Both the highlights and the small hairs appear oversharpened. The highlights are very bright relative to their surroundings. The pixel to pixel contrast is appears too high. It's hard to put it into words, but it doesn't look natural. Most natural subjects have much smoother transitions from pixel to pixel. The image was processed in photoshop, as per the EXIF information. -- Ram-Man23:46, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think, that more than 90% snaps in this section was processed by photoshop or similar programs and I dońt mind. The reason of this pictures is to show visitors of wikipedia, how some subject look like and this is also case of our picture here, I believe. To say, that insect looks annaturally could enthomologist, but that is not case of another of us, isn´t it? --Karelj15:26, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good sharpness/colors but very poor composition. The "backside" view is not appealing at all. Should have been taken front on with the insect --Fir0002www23:31, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]