Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Dallol-2001.jpg
Image:Dallol-2001.jpg, not featured edit
Info created by Herve-sth - uploaded by Herve-sth - nominated by Nikola Smolenski --Nikola Smolenski 19:44, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Support -- excellently represented topic, high resolution, beautiful colors and composition. Nikola Smolenski 19:44, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Oppose Because of noise, some artifacts, and the black bar at the bottom --Digon3 20:02, 23 April 2007 (UTC)- Oppose - Blurry, noisy, full of artifacts and strange marks, like it were a scan of an analog photo. Careless nomination. Alvesgaspar 20:49, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- Support --Karelj 22:16, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Comment - I'm puzzled. Is this picture really better focused than this one and better quality than this one? I don't use to comment on user's oppinions but sometimes I just can't keep silent. Alvesgaspar 14:09, 24 April 2007 (UTC)- Comment I believe, everybody has its preferences for classification. I prefer originality and estetic quality of photography, the technical features as size of sample or some small wrong focused parto f it are from my point of view on the second place. --Karelj 19:03, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Support - Karol007 09:30, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Question - What's that horizontal blurry line (not the black bar) across the pic on the lower part of the photo ? Benh 09:34, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- Looks like a scanner fault; I suspect the pic is a scan from a slide, given the black edge at the bottom - MPF 20:03, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Neutral - would support if the black bar was removed and the horizontal blurry line and other artefacts were edited to be less obvious. - MPF 20:03, 24 April 2007 (UTC)- Oppose Really nice view, would be very nice if the quality was better. I am mostly thinking of the horizontal lines and the blurriness. /Daniel78 15:49, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose ack Alvesgaspar --Leafnode 06:19, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 07:24, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
