Support Lovely image, with a nice depth of field (a very few very near objects are blurry, but not enough to be troublesome). Beautiful! Adam Cuerden22:32, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Hum, I hadn't thought of this. My understanding was that this copyright thing applied only to external views of the tower lighting, but there seems to be no mention of this in texts I could find, and a 1/15 shutter speed clearly shows I have used more than ambient lighting. Let me know if you want me to delete the image. (and ${insert your favorite swearword here} to SNTE). --Nattfodd08:17, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think this is a copyright issue, because of the lack of creative lighting, but what do I know about things like that? This picture would have been better if taken during the day time I think with a properly lit blue sky, or even if taken in the evening around sunset. -- Ram-Man13:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Info That's on purpose, the point of this shot was to show how complex the internal structure is and how easy it is to get lost in its perspective. As for 'odd colours', go complain to the SNTE. --Nattfodd13:21, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support For the same reasons. The Eiffel Tower is a very heavy object and this chaos reflects this internal complexity. J-Luc08:43, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]