Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:False Color Human Eye.jpg
Image:False Color Human Eye.jpg - not featured edit
Info created by RevolverOcelot - uploaded by RevolverOcelot - nominated by RevolverOcelot -- RevolverOcelot 21:29, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Support Support as nominator and creator; just a shot of what the eye might look like through non-visible light spectrum. Kinda pretty. RevolverOcelot 21:29, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Oppose. I have to say I don't really see the value of an image of how something 'might look'. It's also noisy and rather badly posterised. --MichaelMaggs 08:55, 17 April 2008 (UTC)- Info I suppose that the 'value' would be, theoretically, that some people might find it aesthetically pleasing to look at; however I completely understand the noisiness turning you off, of course (although the fact that the noise is only your SECONDARY complaint does make me question whether the pic has any aesthetics to begin with...) RevolverOcelot 22:20, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose ask MichaeMaggs. --Leafnode 11:21, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Laziale93 18:36, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Looks like it is false colour masking inferior quality. Lycaon 06:09, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Comment What a sweet accusation. Actually the original is perfectly sharp but, by my own admission, is also boring. Everyone knows what a human eye looks like, not everyone might know how a bumblebee sees it, though. After running a bunch of matching color-gradients over it that noise crops up, and although I certainly could have handled it better I think in the future you might do well to not attribute to malice what is explained by incompetence. (and anyway, at least it isn't 'war advertising', right? ;) RevolverOcelot 20:10, 19 April 2008 (UTC)- Oppose As above. --Karelj 08:10, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Doesn't really look great when you see it's full resolution. --Kanonkas(talk) 18:44, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
2 support, 5 oppose >> not featured -- Alvesgaspar 21:46, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
