Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Flower poster.jpg

Image:Flower poster.jpg, featured edit

Original (left), featured edit

Info I was always fascinated by the big flower posters in the walls of the flowers shops, with dozens of different species. I cannot make one as big as those but maybe this little one will transmit the same feeling of wonder. Created and nominated by Alvesgaspar --Alvesgaspar 00:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alvesgaspar 00:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it --B.navez 02:35, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it too --Speagles 04:50, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thermos 06:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Works for me. Very nicely done and all high quality parts. Just one little bit of side critique: I don't like the font of the English names ;-). Lycaon 08:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great work! Chmehl 08:56, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks good. - Anonymous Dissident^Talk 10:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johney (talk) 12:26, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not used, but very good for Wikibooks or Wikialbum Przykuta 12:47, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice! --AM 13:19, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Your stork's bill is not Erodium ciconium but the mediterranean stork's bill (E. malacoides). Lycaon 13:50, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you, I trust in your judgement, mais mon coeur a balancé entre les deux... It's fixed now -- Alvesgaspar 17:11, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful poster! Fg2 21:51, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If the photos are available separately, I suggest editing the image page and adding links to them. Fg2 21:51, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Done -- Alvesgaspar 23:14, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support wau --Böhringer 23:18, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~oppose~~ Neutral Would support if Stork's bill and Crown Daisy were replaced with images of better focus. --Dori - Talk 23:40, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Info -- Those images were replaced with better versions -- Alvesgaspar 13:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Are you talking about the image on the right? The replaced Stork's bill is not much better as it's still out of focus and overexposed. It's also missing the caption and it's not aligned properly with the other images. --Dori - Talk 20:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Info - Yes, the image at left (the one at right had a problem but it's fixed now). The picture is not overexpose, as you can verify in the histogram (which easily checked by anyone, btw) -- Alvesgaspar 21:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - It's improved, but not enough for me to support. Going with neutral. --Dori - Talk 22:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - But you were right about the overexposure. I think I have a problem with my editing software. Anyway, I have corrected the pink one ;-) -- Alvesgaspar 23:20, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      - It wasn't just overexposure, I also didn't like the focus on it. And also, I don't think it's the software that's faulty, you weren't looking at the right histogram. You should look at the color ones too. --Dori - Talk 14:26, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj 23:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dtarazona 14:37, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice, but I dont like the strange font used for English names.--Juan de Vojníkov 00:59, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose beautiful flower pictures, but I don't like the idea of featuring a poster like that as I don't see how it can be used on wikipedia/wikicommons - the legend can only be read at full size, the selection of flowers is random - I really would prefer the pictures to the poster... --Anna reg 23:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- usability on wikipedia/wikicommons is irrelevant (per FP/commons scope: useful for any wikimedia project but also for printing). Lycaon 13:29, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Mywood 21:13, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aternative (right), not featured edit

Info - Please consider this alternative, where the twelve flowers are of different families and there are only three inflorescences (contrarily to the original, where most of the flowers are from the Asteraceae family). I know that the quality of some pictures is not as good but the poster is more illustrative of the subject and thus more encyclopaedic -- Alvesgaspar 19:14, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar 19:15, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Mywood 21:13, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]