Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Hopetoun falls.jpg

Image:Hopetoun falls.jpg - featured edit

Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Arad --Arad 05:14, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support good wallpaper --Arad 05:14, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not that interesting, and to be a good wallpaper it should be 1024px or higher. --Erina 08:18, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support one of my favourites. It's technically perfect and suitable to illustrate waterfall and nature articles. Indon 08:37, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support / tsca @ 11:36, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support I strongly support this picture for its beauty and technical perfection. However, it falls short of the resolution requirements suggested in the guidelines (as many other featured pictures, here and in the Wikipedia). How should we deal with the exceptions? And why is there a so large difference between the criteria here and in Wikipedia?Alvesgaspar 12:50, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

it's a guideline not a rule, it's for encouraging people to only nominate pictures with a reasonable resolution. If it has a low resolution it might be exceptional in all other points and still become featured. -- Gorgo 14:00, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support very good one --Faraj
~~Neutral~~ technically quite good, but rather low res and info is not sufficient (which country??). Lycaon 13:48, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is said on the bottom of the picture, it's in Australia. --Arad 19:46, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding that info Lycaon 06:08, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. --Arad 21:13, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Long-time exposure makes the water look unnatural Roger McLassus 16:27, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support The 'unnatural' water is the point of the picture. Great ! --ezeew
Support I thought it was already a FP, at least now it will be. --Digon3 17:22, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AngMoKio 17:34, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support long exposure captures the movement of the water and at the same time adds to the feeling of tranquility in the picture. Great! --Dschwen 20:27, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- size is concern but the composition is sufficiently strong enough to ignore size Gnangarra 06:07, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support ack Dschwen - Simonizer 08:21, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support ack Gnangarra -- Lycaon 12:57, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose AGAINST AGAIN -- Michael 18:13, 23 October 2006 (UTC) User was not logged in--AngMoKio 18:18, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Ditto to Roger McLassus. Would be very nice with a faster exposure (about 1/60th sec is supposed to best reflect how the eye perceives flowing water) - MPF 22:13, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MichaelMaggs 06:46, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good composition--SimONE 07:31, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support not bad --Jollyroger 09:47, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support looks perfect to me --XN 12:29, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Oonagh 13:37, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sh@ry tales 20:11, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Francisco M. Marzoa 00:04, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose agree with Roger McLassus and MPF Tbc 20:38, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support dreamy mood. Dori | Talk 03:43, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is a fantastic photo! Five stars —the preceding unsigned comment is by Yash (talk • contribs)
Oppose Ss181292 15:01, 1 November 2006 (UTC) - ack Roger McLassus + a little to low resolution (1.3 MPix).[reply]

5 oppose, 21 support → featured Alvesgaspar 10:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]