Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Kaiseradler Aquila heliaca amk.jpg

Image:Kaiseradler Aquila heliaca amk.jpg edit

Info Aquila heliaca created, uploaded, nominated by AngMoKio -- AngMoKio 15:26, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Original (left) - not featured edit

Support -- AngMoKio 15:26, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Simonizer 16:42, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support WOW! Rastrojo _(D•ES) 19:35, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support top --Böhringer 19:46, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mbz1 00:23, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Nice picture but needs denoising (not only in the background) -- Alvesgaspar 16:50, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to improve it a little - also by reducing size as i am not a big fan of denoising. Better? --AngMoKio 17:29, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Its not a good idea when editing images during a nomination. I have 2 agree with Alves. Tone value priority is a nice thing but can cause heavy noise. EXIF infos would be great --Richard Bartz 17:34, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yeah guess you are right...so far I mostly added a new version to the nomination. Somehow I had the idea to make it different this time...god knows why :) Do you think that the current version is still too moisy? (EXIF: F/7.1, 1/400s, iso 800 [tripods are not allowed there], 200mm[x1,6] ) So far I haven't found a good way to denoise, that's why I don't really like it. Do you have a good way to denoise...maybe you want to give it a try? :) (The original version is still in the image history) Oh yes and I used tone value priority..but so far i don't understand in which situations it creates noise. --AngMoKio 20:19, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For denoising you can try this. I dont use it anymore but its free. Denoising works best on a raw/psd level at 16 bit. Do you took raw files ?--Richard Bartz 21:21, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will give it a try. Unfortunately i didn't take raw files. --AngMoKio 21:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What a pity. When having RAW available it would be possible to bring back the drawing on the washed out white feathers --Richard Bartz 22:25, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Karelj 17:51, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Supporting the noise-reduced version --Chmehl 08:00, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question Several people have used the expression "deionise", which I understand means to remove ions (eg from water). Is it being used synonymously with "noise reduction" here? If so, it's a usage I have not seen before. --MichaelMaggs 20:22, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Greenish white-balance. -- Ram-Man 00:18, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

5 support, 4 oppose >> not featured -- Alvesgaspar 20:49, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit (right) - featured edit

Comment Added new version Is it better concerning noise? --AngMoKio 18:56, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AngMoKio 20:22, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Yes, it is! -- Alvesgaspar 20:23, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks :-) took me quite some nerves to get it done. --AngMoKio 20:24, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support Excellent shot, a pity about the lack of tripod by IS seems to have compensated well for it. (you used IS, right?) Freedom to share 20:39, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yes..it was an IS lense. --AngMoKio 20:43, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support Noise dont bother me anymore. But i support this as well --Simonizer 21:20, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice shot! --Chmehl 08:00, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj 19:19, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MichaelMaggs 20:16, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer 21:15, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Taraxacum 14:33, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Richard Bartz 17:21, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Greenish white-balance. -- Ram-Man 00:18, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Out of focus feathers. Barabas 21:19, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

10 support, 2 oppose >> featured -- Alvesgaspar 22:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]