Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Kingdom of scotland royal arms2.svg

Image:Kingdom of scotland royal arms.svg, featured version 2 edit

First version, not featured edit

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Chabacano --Chabacano 17:42, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Chabacano 17:42, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --WarX 06:35, 10 November 2007 (UTC) No with this semi-transparent white gradient, which simulates pseudo-3D.[reply]

I like it :) This is how they do in the French blasons project.Chabacano 15:01, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am impressed work of this project, but the concept of this pseudo-3D is great mistake. Coat of Arms should be something that:

You are able to paint on your shield
Allow you to be distinguished from your enemies on the battlefield
You are proud of

This pseudo-3D makes no 3 impossible for me. --WarX 00:01, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Well, it is very easy to change! modified version below Chabacano 01:53, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WarX. Lycaon 13:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for now. Great SVG work, but looking at the other versions, each one is different, so which one is correct ? Isn't somewhere an official representation of this coat of arms in order to make a comparison ? Sting 13:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Variations in some parts (mantling, motto, supporters) are allowed, as long as it fits the description. this is a quite used version. The insignia of the Order of the thistle, in the other hand, is here Chabacano 13:44, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Variations doesn't mean a mishmash of 3D, 2D and cartoonesque elements. Lycaon 15:06, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously it does not mean that: We were talking about the heraldic accuracy. If you do not like the style, that is ok, but a different topic. Chabacano 22:58, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral --For now. Support for the technical quality, but as I have no knowledge about coats of arms I can't evaluate this part and I would like first the opinion of specialists before giving my support. Sting 15:16, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --libertad0 ॐ 14:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I only find that there's something weird in the scottish flag but i still think its a great job.-rafax 23:24, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, the shine effect isn't suitable for an image like this. --Aqwis 12:25, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Cecil 15:04, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Without shine effect in the inner shield, featured edit

Info shine effect removed. Chabacano 01:53, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --libertad0 ॐ 16:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support, great SVG. --Aqwis 12:25, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice! Rastrojo 19:19, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb!Masur 21:29, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Chabacano 22:26, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment but now it doesn't match your other ones... Rocket000 19:55, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose it still is a terrible mishmash of 3D, 2D and cartoonesque elements. Lycaon 07:50, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose So busy! The grinning red lion does remind me of an '80's saturday morning cartoon. Potatoswatter 02:32, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Cecil 15:04, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]