Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:LeopardMothBlueSpots edit2.jpg

Image:LeopardMothBlueSpots.jpg edit

Original - not featured edit

Info created by Kevincollins123 - uploaded by Kevincollins123 - nominated by Kevincollins123 -- Kevincollins123 07:17, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kevincollins123 07:17, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Dilaudid 08:12, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very impressive --norro 08:18, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ The small DOF works well here to focus attention on the head.--MichaelMaggs 08:30, 25 May 2008 (UTC) Now supporting edit 2. --MichaelMaggs 21:54, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Fantastic! -startaq 08:41, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful image. --Kanonkas_(talk) 10:38, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Welcome to the bug-lovers tribe. I'm amazed how you managed to get such large DOF with a F/2 aperture, even with a 35mm lens. Marvelous optics, what lens are you using? -- Alvesgaspar 10:47, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The aperture was actually f/22. The EXIF is incorrect since I used a non-electronic lens extender. The lens used was a Nikon 35mm f/2D AF. --Kevincollins123 19:00, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please do an effort at proper categorization: Lepidoptera is not sufficient. Thanks. Lycaon 13:09, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Econt 15:32, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support I actually like the vignetting, adds more depth to the image. Could be toned down a little bit though. --Calibas 17:33, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question What is this??? Mrmariokartguy 20:25, 25 May 2008 (UTC) !!!!![reply]
Support --Mbdortmund 21:34, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF 13:28, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support I do not like artificial white backgrounds. --Manco Capac 19:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

10 support, 0 oppose >> not featured (Edit2 featured)-- Alvesgaspar 20:07, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit 1 edit

~~Support Edit 1~~ ~~The vignetting should really be fixed though. Its fairly obvious on the white bg.~~ Mfield 15:36, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I noticed that the original was in AdobeRGB which is not ideal for WP/web use. I created Edit 1 - converted to sRGB, corrected vignetting and lightened background ~~slightly~~. Mfield 16:28, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Rearmost part of the wings lost. --norro 22:51, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This Edit has been superceded by Edit 2 from the original. I withdraw this. Mfield 23:31, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

0 support, 1 oppose >> Nomination withdrawn, not featured  --Richard Bartz 08:14, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit 2 - featured edit

Comment I like Mfield's modifications. I attempted to replicate them on the TIFF original, preserving more of the rear wings, cleaning noise in the shadows, and eliminating the straight-edged shadow under the left front foot. --Kevincollins123 19:57, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MichaelMaggs 21:53, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Lycaon 21:57, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Richard Bartz 22:21, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better --norro 22:51, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support better from the original obviously. Mfield 23:29, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- I really love this picture!! It's so captivating and interesting. It certainly catches the eye. Photographystudent 00:36, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer 11:13, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Simonizer 16:08, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche 20:49, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support, better than other. --Pauk 03:02, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ram-Man 01:18, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aqwis 15:09, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's the best edit. --Pauk 03:46, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

13 support, 0 oppose >> featured -- Alvesgaspar 20:06, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]