Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Male mallard3.jpg

Info created, uploaded, nominated by Calibas --Calibas 03:31, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Calibas 03:31, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A mallard is, let's say, really common. To make a shot of it an FP we would need to make it really special. Find a female sitting on her eggs, make one wear a Guns N' Roses T-Shirt :) or something like that and I will happily support it. (Don't abuse ducks, though :) ) Freedom to share 16:10, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment ~~I guess that previous Oppose is not valid until signed?~~ fixed. Acarpentier 22:31, 31 October 2007 (UTC) Acarpentier 16:58, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I wouldn't have nominated it but, in my opinion, this is the best shot we have of a male mallard. Calibas 00:16, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Best shot that meets FP requirements? Calibas 02:32, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral, i'm not sure about this picture. On one hand, it is sharp and has great colours. On the other hand, i dislike the composition - the bird is too centred. The "stuff" in the upper right corner has got to go too, either by cropping the picture or by using the clone tool. --Aqwis 16:21, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support The composition doesn't really bother me because of the vibrant colours and lovely subject. I wouldn't mind a cloning-out of the "stuff" either, though. Doodle-doo Ħ 20:39, 1 November 2007 (UTC) Supporting below version : ) Doodle-doo Ħ 15:02, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Benh 17:23, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Info Stuff cloned out. --Calibas 02:50, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Calibas 02:50, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, unfortunately, there are now ugly smudge marks where the "stuff" (heh) used to be. This can be done better. --Aqwis 19:19, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. The smudges are barely noticeable; if anything they look like ripples. Don't bother me. Doodle-doo Ħ 15:03, 4 November 2007 (UTC)Below is better. Doodle-doo Ħ 21:35, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Cecil 09:35, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Info Cloned out the "stuff" without getting any ugly smudge marks. --Aqwis 22:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aqwis 22:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support The above job was probably the best clone stamp job I've ever done, this is much better. Calibas 00:47, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ack Calibas. Good sharpness and colours as well. - Relic38 02:19, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Finally Doodle-doo Ħ 21:36, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like how the duck is looking at me. Rocket000 01:24, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wo-o-o-ooow :) Benh 21:08, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Cecil 11:40, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]