Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Mg-k Eisfall.jpg

--Thryduulf 15:57, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Thryduulf 15:57, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Too small. Seriously, 300px in width is not very much. It should be easy to shoot this as a vertical pano with >1000px width. Will support if larger version comes up. --Dschwen 17:18, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ack Dschwen. I don't like the signature too. Otherwise it might be excellent. --Ikiwaner 19:15, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Yes, it's too small. --Daniel78
Comment The uploader just told me that he won't upload a bigger version or one without his signature. --SehLax 20:05, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I appreciate Your compliments on the photo very much, but the big version is not for free use. I don't think that Wikimedia is a self-service picture agency. The signature is to identify exactly this licensed version. --Mg-k 10:00, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Wikimedia Commons is supposed to be exactly that. But everybody is entitled to license their own pictures as they wish. --Dschwen 09:27, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Agree with Dschwen.
Oppose too small and not acceptable with signature MGo 06:59, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not acceptable with signature and the colors need cleaning up. Freedom to share 15:09, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Low res. Francisco M. Marzoa 19:34, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Greycard 08:12, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Day 7: 1 support (nominator), 7 oppose --> not featured Roger McLassus 08:02, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]