Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Miscanti Lagoon near San Pedro de Atacama Chile Luca Galuzzi 2006.jpg

Image:Miscanti Lagoon near San Pedro de Atacama Chile Luca Galuzzi 2006.jpg, featured edit

Info Salar de Talar near San Pedro de Atacama, Norte Grande, Chile. - created and uploaded by Luca Galuzzi - nominated by Überraschungsbilder 13:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support true colours, good composition, brilliant shot --Überraschungsbilder 13:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support agree (but can't tell if true colours) Benh 13:44, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support // tsca [re] 17:39, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XN 18:25, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Mountain colors look totally irreal (I'm not saying they are irreal!), I've searched "Salar de Talar" on google images, some other photos look pretty much the same. Is there any explanation to this? The contrast between the sky and the mountains is pretty shocking. --Atoma 19:41, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Double support! --Packa 21:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Wow!! Never been there, but happy to accept the colours are real - a combination of dark sky at very high altitude (it's at 4,100m alt.), lava on the mountains, salt flats, and halophilic microorganisms in the water. - MPF 21:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, colors looked irreals also been there, explanation is no pollution at all at 4,100m alt. and no humidity in the dryest desert on Earth. Coming back to sea level was depressing! Thanks everybody. --LucaG 20:36, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Lycaon 05:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Simonizer 06:43, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Leafnode 08:30, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Maire 12:46, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Stef Mec 15:34, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj 16:30, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jespinos 23:10, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. ~ trialsanderrors 04:48, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral It looks unreal as it's been oversharpened, I think. --MichaelMaggs 16:39, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- What makes you think that? I don't see any evidence for it. ~ trialsanderrors 08:11, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support impressive... --AngMoKio 17:16, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support ¡Perfecto! Hugo.arg 08:41, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Basik07 20:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support okay Viele-baeren 21:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support sanchezn 15:33, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Susanlesch 00:30, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Amazing --Kachan 04:09, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Urby2004 16:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Simonizer 06:56, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]