Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Mrs. Herbert Stevens.jpg

Info created, uploaded & nominated by Laitche -- Laitche 20:57, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Laitche 20:57, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Lycaon 21:35, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support A little muted, but it's pretty good. -- Ram-Man 00:11, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer 06:03, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The flower could be brightened up a little; it's rather too dark for my liking. --MichaelMaggs 06:39, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral agrre with MichaelMaggs --norro 08:23, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dull lighting, no wow. Barabas 21:06, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose all: bland composition --JDiPierro 16:10, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Supporting edit 1. --MichaelMaggs 20:24, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dull lighting, no wow. --Beyond silence 15:54, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

result: 3 support, 1 neutral, 4 oppose >> not featured -- Alvesgaspar 09:06, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Info - Let's try with a little more light -- Alvesgaspar 10:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Better now -- Alvesgaspar 10:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Any will do. Since the original has enough useful data to be trivially edited, I'd just as soon take that one since it is the original and doesn't look bad anyway, but it doesn't matter that much. -- Ram-Man 15:18, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MichaelMaggs 20:24, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Laitche 10:13, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ALL. Come one, this is just a picture of a rose, with some distracting background, dull lighting, as someone have already stated, not that special to be a Featured Picture. Here is just an example of what I think is better work: Barabas 23:00, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Info - Please put your vote in each nomination, this one only applies here -- Alvesgaspar 23:05, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I think if this flower's colour were yellow, they wouldn't support this pic. I mean the white is difficult to take as itself. :) -- Laitche 03:56, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- per Ram-Man. Lycaon 23:03, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

5 support, 1 oppose >> not featured -- Alvesgaspar 19:32, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Have to agree with Barabas. QI for me. --norro 16:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Info Alves's background + Laitche's foreground. :) -- Laitche 12:07, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Laitche 12:03, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Any will do, as above. -- Ram-Man 15:18, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- per Ram-Man. Lycaon 23:04, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Taraxacum 07:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A good, but not great capture of an ordinary subject, with some distracting background, dull lighting, as someone have already stated, not that special to be a Featured Picture. Here is just an example of what I think is better work: . On the other hand it does not cease to surprise me that 98% of rose pictures are worse, and most of them far worse. Barabas 17:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer 19:54, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Reality factor is great. --Manco Capac 07:05, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

6 support, 1 oppose >> featured -- Alvesgaspar 19:33, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Have to agree with Barabas. QI for me. --norro 16:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]