Info created and uploaded by Gbrocker – nominated by Martin Kozák --Martin Kozák 20:24, 8 May 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support --Martin Kozák 20:24, 8 May 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Very good, I like the colors --C·A·S·K 20:51, 8 May 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Tomer T 20:52, 8 May 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support - I suspect this will be the first featured slug in Commons, brrr... Good picture, vivid colours, correct focus - Alvesgaspar 20:53, 8 May 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Neutral The head is in focus, but the body isn't and there's flash glare on the head.--HereToHelp (talk ) 21:03, 8 May 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Gorgeous! Vmenkov 22:24, 8 May 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support --Karelj 22:44, 8 May 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose ack HereToHelp -- Lycaon 08:23, 9 May 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Pimke 09:03, 9 May 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support It's very pretty and proves that a photographer with only a 2MP 3MP camera can still produce nice pictures. My understanding is that at 5mm and f/2.8, the DoF here is already approaching the maximum for a camera with such a tiny sensor before diffraction effects degrade the wonderful sharpness. It's about the same as what I'd get at ~f/13 on my Nikon SLR. -- Ram-Man 19:08, 9 May 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose ack HereToHelp, mainly for the body not in focus. --Digon3 13:07, 9 May 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support --Winiar ✉ 15:24, 9 May 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose , too shallow DOF, most of the slug is blurred --che 16:09, 9 May 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose not well composed. Unfavorable DOF. Metoc
Oppose - sorry, ack HereToHelp --Leafnode 06:28, 11 May 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support --Chmee2 14:31, 11 May 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Neutral she is looking at me ! Bergwolf
Neutral Aww it's slimy and says "Hi" :) Great detail on the head but poor detail everywhere else. --Thisisbossi 02:17, 13 May 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support Jina Lee 04:38, 13 May 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose agree with Metoc --Simonizer 07:41, 15 May 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]
11 support, 3 neutral, 6 oppose >> not featured - Alvesgaspar 13:23, 19 May 2007 (UTC) [ reply ]