Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Passerella iliaca-001.jpg

Image:Passerella iliaca-001.jpg - not featured edit

Info created by Mdf - uploaded by Factumquintus - nominated by Arad --Arad 02:28, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Arad 02:28, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice lighting! Not more resolution? --Luc Viatour 05:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool! --mh 12:56, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too small, otherwise certain support. Lycaon 15:24, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment quote: A resolution of at least 2 million pixel (e.g. 2000 x 1000) seems reasonable right now Lycaon 19:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support extraordinarly fine for this size.B.navez 16:29, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gordo 22:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Green Bonsai 16:18, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose very nice, but resolution is < 1 mp -- Gorgo 01:25, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lacen 07:43, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very nice picture, but not exceptional due to small size and branch in foreground. Mdf can do better. Alvesgaspar 12:53, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Ansett 12:43, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Alvesgaspar --SvonHalenbach 09:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - would support but for that twig across its legs. Comment "Not more resolution?" - not easy to get with a wild bird. I'd assume this is likely cropped from the middle of a much larger pic. - MPF 22:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Small size and distracting branch. --MichaelMaggs 22:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Very very beautiful, and a damned shame about the branch pointed out by Alvesgaspar.Stephen.job 08:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 7 support, 1 neutral, 7 oppose >> not featured Alvesgaspar 09:16, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]