Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Prometheus Adam Louvre MR1745.jpg

Prometheus bound by Nicolas-Sébastien Adam edit

original version (left) - not featured edit

Info created by Marie-Lan Nguyen - uploaded by Marie-Lan Nguyen - nominated by Remi Diligent -- 16:30, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Diligent 16:30, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lestat 11:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice shot, and a beautiful sculpture. Arjun 14:23, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Jacopo86 15:08, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You could get some extra-contrast to your image by playing with the levels. I've done a Auto-levels in Photoshop and it adds more depth and a tri-dimensional feeling --Andy 08:49, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Feel free to upload the result of your work and add it to this Featured picture voting. Diligent
  - Here it is (3rd version) --Andy 12:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Neuceu 13:39, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support beautiful light for this stunning sculpture Metoc 16:44, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral for now. This is am impressive sculpture and a beatiful picture. But I agree with Andy, it should benefit from a little more contrast, specially between the subject and the background, without sacrificing the rich palette of grays. Some downsampling might help. Alvesgaspar 17:42, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose because it is too unsharp for a not moving object and too grainy to be special. The color of the light is mixed between a warm glow of a bulb and daylight or flash. This Picture has to be redone to get my support vote. --SvonHalenbach 16:04, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ack SvonHalenbach — Lycaon 23:01, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

5 support, 1 neutral, 3 oppose >> not featured Alvesgaspar 18:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

edited version (right) - not featured edit

Info and Support Here is a slightly edited version, which IMO improves on the beauty of the photo and emphsizes the dramatism of the sculpture. Alvesgaspar 01:02, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Diligent 08:22, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Colours looks quite nice here, but you need to readd the EXIF info from the oryginal picture. (you may change my vote to {Support} after that) --Nux (talk··dyskusja) 12:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 2 support, 1 oppose >> not featured Alvesgaspar 08:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

edited version (3rd to the right) - not featured edit

Info and Support Here is another edit. Alvesgaspar, you were faster than me! I've done this yesterday but didn't have time to upload it. Levels were processed (auto-levels), and IMO it feels more tri dimensional. -- Andy 12:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I am too amateur to judge whose version is the best ;) but i think the picture should be featured. So I add my support to your version too and leave it to the others to decide which has the best "levels" --Diligent 15:49, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think there was too much red added in this one --Nux (talk··dyskusja) 12:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

  2 support, 1 oppose >> not featured Alvesgaspar 08:33, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]