Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Rose Petals.jpg

Image:Rose Petals.jpg, not featured edit

Info created, uploaded & nominated by Atoma. (F/8, 0.3s, ISO200, developed from RAW) --Atoma 00:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Atoma 00:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no species information (e.g. cultivar) -- Lycaon 07:15, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Info I'm a photographer, not a flower specialist. What I am submitting to your judgement is a photo. If you (or anyone else) could provide species information I'd be happy to include it. IMHO you should judge the image when supporting/opposing. --Atoma 08:40, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment well even when it is not pointed as a rule, it is desirable that all plants and animals in commons are identified. if you yourself dont know you could add it to the Unidentified plants category or if you have a good eye, try to find the apropiate name in the rose page-LadyofHats 10:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral A good picture, but i personally dont like the the crop and the white background. --Simonizer 13:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good Picture! ---donald- 21:26, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support for sure no shot for a encyclopedia still a good composition and quality --AngMoKio 19:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - ditto to Lycaon (sorry, but I do consider identification information important) and to Simonizer on the cropping - MPF 23:49, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with MPF Tbc 13:49, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the same --Karelj 21:48, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, background is disturbing. --Tone 20:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 07:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]