Info created by Kelly Martin - uploaded by Kelly Martin - nominated by Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir
Support -- I find this image of a well-documented American landmark unusually beautiful. The dark clouds especially lend an air of heaviness to the image. Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 15:11, 15 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support -- A great, high quality image. Mets501 21:46, 15 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose too tiny -- Lycaon 15:19, 15 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose Aliman5040 16:34, 15 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support me likes it Drini 22:22, 15 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose - only 146kB, and it shows. With a well-photographed site like this, I'd want to see at least 600-700kB (and many would want over a megabyte) - MPF 23:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose Romary 12:46, 16 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Support —freakofnurture 16:30, 17 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose I like the picture, but the size is insufficient for a featured picture. /Dcastor 23:08, 19 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose -- resolution + I enjoy more without clouds (Image:Mt Rushmore 3 by erikmarr.jpg ) --YolanC 13:12, 20 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose off center, cloudy -- Reywas92 17:55, 20 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose Grainy, not the most ideal outdoor lighting, small size. --Fastfission 00:29, 22 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]
Oppose small, wrong angle(can't see all faces that well), lighting off and a bit grainy. --Digon3 13:37, 25 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ] 4 support, 9 oppose → not featured Roger McLassus 20:41, 30 August 2006 (UTC) [ reply ]