Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Taming of the Shrew.jpg

Image:Taming of the Shrew.jpg, featured edit

Info created by C.R.Leslie - uploaded and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:21, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Info By far the best illustration of Taming of the Shrew on commons.
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:21, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Is that blurred part on the centermost man's face from stitching? If there are no other options it could be restored by hand. –Dilaudid 07:20, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm sorry, if I can find it, I'll fix it, but I can't see it =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:50, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Sorry for being vague. It's a horizontal blurred line on the man's nose level. –Dilaudid 14:29, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - Oh, that. Fixed, uploading now =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:24, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      - I'd love to support this, but the blur is still there pestering me... –Dilaudid 17:34, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support It blots thy beauty as frosts do bite the meads, Confounds thy fame as whirlwinds shake fair buds... - Just kiddin, really fine work though. Cirt (talk) 03:44, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thermos (talk) 16:17, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definite yes. Jordan Timothy James Busson (talk) 13:31, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose High quality work, for sure, but not enough wow. Barabas (talk) 00:27, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment At 16MB+ file size (and 20+ megapixels), isn't the image a dab too heavy? At 10/12 jpeg quality (which should suffice imo) the size would be approximately around 10MB. –Dilaudid 09:37, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I usually find that, with works with high contrast like this, that JPEG artefacing becomes too annoying too quickly. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:10, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support An excellent restoration. High resolution files are a good thing. Durova (talk) 18:09, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please hold off closing this a little longer - I'm fixing the flaw Dilaudid found right now - it took a little discussion to direct me to the right part =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:49, 18 August 2008 (UTC) Fixed! Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:58, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

result: 5 supports, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured Benh (talk) 18:24, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks so much for the fix! Much better now :) –Dilaudid 18:49, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]