Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Tawny frogmouth wholebody444.jpg

Info Benjamint 02:48, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Benjamint 02:48, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support well done. —αἰτίας •discussion• 21:02, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Issue has probably been raised before, but why are you taking them at night ? Is it relevant to have them at night rather than at some more brighter time ? I don't like the black background, the flash lighting and I have the feeling this may harm the subject. But if it's relevant to see them at night, I'd reconsider my vote. - Benh (talk) 21:26, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK for relevance. I maintain my oppose because of other issues I mentionned. Benh (talk) 15:34, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OpposeThere is actually some relevance to take these at night, cause they are nocturnal birds. That said the harsh flash light, the over-processing and the insistence at posting images at the smallest possibles size (didn't we agree on the opposite here at commons?), disqualifies this picture for me for FP. Lycaon (talk) 05:31, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support The size meets the criteria, I don't see why it should be a factor. Muhammad 20:52, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't like the lighting either, the flash is too obvious. /Daniel78 (talk) 00:10, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very cool! --RoFra (talk) 17:13, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support could be a little larger given the camera, but great picture nonetheless Ianare (talk) 05:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality for a night shot, not too many such FPs. --Dori - Talk 00:03, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't like the harsh light. I gives an unnatural 'silvery' effect. --Estrilda (talk) 20:23, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer (talk) 10:22, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]