Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Tettigoniidae and Ranunculaceae 1 Luc Viatour.jpg

Image:Tettigoniidae and Ranunculaceae 1 Luc Viatour.jpg, not featured edit

Info created by Luc Viatour - uploaded by Luc Viatour - nominated by --Luc Viatour 09:28, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Luc Viatour 09:28, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Great colours, nice detail and good composition. But I would like it even better when the flower would be in focus too. --Simonizer 11:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Contrary to Simonizer, I think the OOF petals on the flower improve this picture. By the way WOW ! Benh 15:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose FP is not just about the wow factor, although a lot of emphasis is placed on it. The shallow DoF is artsy, but we don't promote pictures just because they are artsy. More DoF is needed, especially on the insect. -- Ram-Man 16:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Composition and theme are great, but I agree that more DOF is needed. Also, the picture lacks colour and light contrast. - Alvesgaspar 17:36, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Flower should be in focus. --Digon3 17:47, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- Mbz1 18:40, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]
Support beside of some weaknesses... supporting because of "wittyness" - exeptional --XN 20:22, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Focus --Karelj 20:42, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I also agree on the dof. /Daniel78 21:49, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose focus --Bergwolf 21:56, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it actually. Jina Lee 03:19, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support An exceptional shot which the small DoF enhances. We need to remember that Commons is not just for boring record shots that have to be sharp throughout; there is room for artistic photography as well and we should encourage that. --MichaelMaggs 06:28, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice colors. --Atoma 07:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose DOF would have been fine if it wasn't for the yellow flower on yellow background. Nothing to help you separate foreground and background. --MichaD 22:29, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the DOF is great. And the colours are great too. --Christoph Michels 23:57, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Focus where it matters --Tony Wills 12:11, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Winiar^✉ 16:27, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Due to the good DOF the background has a beautiful color. Nice Metoc 17:55, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support But would be good deeper depth of field. --Martin Kozák 12:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 12 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. Simonizer 16:56, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]