Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:TokioShibuya-Kimono.jpg

Image:TokioShibuya-Kimono.jpg - not featured edit

Info created by Sl-Ziga - uploaded by Sl-Ziga - nominated by Sl-Ziga --Ziga 14:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ziga 14:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrejj 14:49, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Ladies are nice but the picture quality is very poor. Please note that the guidelines about image quality apply to the pictures in full resolution, not in thumb size. - Alvesgaspar 14:53, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- comment: if 3543x5315 is poor, how much is not poor? --Ziga 18:44, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Please try to downsample the picture, like Dschwen is suggesting. It is clear that the actual size is too high considering the image quality - Alvesgaspar 19:44, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Alvesgaspar -- Simonizer 15:04, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment obviously a scan. The resolution is too high for the film grain of the original. But the grain should be considered in relation to the image size. Downsampling would increase percieved quality considerably. So the pic is fine by me. Not ok is the signature on the picture, those are strongly discouraged! --Dschwen 15:06, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- comment: yes, a slide scan (TIFF was 58MB) --Ziga 23:00, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I´m not very firm in that, but whats about the copyright status of the seen Logos (e.g. McDonalds)? —the preceding unsigned comment is by Simonizer (talk • contribs)
- Irrelevant as they are only background and not central subject of the image. --Dschwen 16:55, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the picture as it brings back memories of my Tokyo days, but not sure how this could be used. If it's an article on kimonos, you could probably find better samples, and if it's about Shibuya, I can think of other images which would show the more typical aspect of that Tokyo district, like the Shibuya crossing, or the Spanish steps for example. I do like the image though so I'll support it. Jnpet 18:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - ditto to Alvesgaspar - MPF 21:22, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose norro 21:28, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment it seems odd to me that high resolution is suddenly interpreted as a disadvantage of the picture. A simple downsampling shows that little grain is visible at a still high resolution. --Dschwen 09:38, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose noise levels - Lycaon 09:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose grain Lestat 17:28, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the version edited by Dschwen has far less grain. Fg2 05:46, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose bad contrast - Les contrastes sont trop mauvais. -- Pseudomoi (to chat on WP) 16:05, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Signature on the picture. Yann 21:48, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --medium69 22:30, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 3 support, 9 oppose >> not featured Alvesgaspar 15:47, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]