- Info everything by Benjamint 12:17, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Benjamint 12:17, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support--Mbz1 13:22, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Amazingly amazing ! Benh 17:21, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --MichaelMaggs 17:25, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Böhringer 21:56, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Richard Bartz 23:44, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Really sharp. --Beyond silence 10:35, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support fantastic picture --Benhello! 11:35, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Some disturbing oversharpening effects on the lizard (compare to this picture where only minimal sharpening was employed). Lycaon 12:32, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Jarvin 14:29, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Winiar✉ 16:20, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Great picture, great sharpness. I don't agree that it's oversharpened. --Aqwis 18:29, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Good picture, it is slightly oversharpened though. Calibas 19:40, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Nice, all the lizard part are on focus. Bit sharpened but ok. Acarpentier 03:10, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Even if it is slightly oversharpened. --Digon3 talk 21:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral Picture is generally OK, but the oversharpening ruined it for me --Leafnode 07:17, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Basik07 07:40, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- if any of you happen to be over Qic way... Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list#Tree Dragon --Benjamint 09:17, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Harsh lighting, going with another image above. Dori - Talk 02:10, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
result: 15 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral => promoted on 18 October 2007 by benjamint444 -- Bryan (talk to me) 19:44, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]