Question to the nominator. I know you are always overly concern about framing. Don't you think that the framing is too tight and , a little more space above/below is needed? Besides the framing at the right-hand side is not equal to the framing at the left-hand side. Doesn't it concerns you also? It is a rhetorical question. No reply is needed--Mbz101:33, 11 June 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]
I sure am. It's hard for me to express myself in English as well as you do, so I copied and pasted the comment you've made, (and which I really liked!). I realized I could not say it any better. I hope you do not mind.(It is what I rellay think about your picture)--Mbz105:27, 11 June 2007 (UTC)Mbz1[reply]
Support The lighting is a little harsh, but not overly so. The over- and under-exposed elements are not the most important aspects of the image. I think it's pretty, but it's not a big deal either way. As for framing, it's my standard fare: more detail means more encyclopedic value. Don't like it, then oppose it. (Too bad the plant has grown so big this year. It isn't that small (or the same shape) anymore, so I can't just retake the same picture.) -- Ram-Man03:01, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose We are not wikipedia, so encyclopedic value alone is not enough for me to support a picture. Quality is ok but lighting is too harsh. --Simonizer06:36, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]