Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/June 2023

File:LakeStClair sentinel2 (cropped).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2023 at 18:50:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Satellite_images#North_America
Info created by European Union, Copernicus Sentinel-2 imagery - uploaded by PalauanLibertarian - nominated by PalauanLibertarian -- PalauanLibertarian (talk) 18:50, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PalauanLibertarian (talk) 18:50, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice, interesting photo. The colors in the lake would normally be considered posterized, but I think that's fine with a satellite picture. I've never heard it said that Lake St. Clair is one of the Great Lakes, though. w:Lake St. Clair states that "It is part of the Great Lakes system, and along with the St. Clair River and Detroit River, Lake St. Clair connects Lake Huron (to the north) with Lake Erie (to the south)." Can we substitute that description (or better, an excerpt of it), for the claim in the file description that Lake St. Clair is "one of the Great Lakes of North America"? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:51, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe, but I think it's better to take it out. I was just using the description on the source page. PalauanLibertarian (talk) 01:16, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's a European satellite image; the caption writer probably isn't as familiar with the area and would not know most people who live there, let alone most Americans and Canadians, would not consider it one of the Great Lakes even if it's between two of them. Daniel Case (talk) 03:28, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 04:47, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:42, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 04:04, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:21, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:06, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Would be cool to see similar satellite imagery of Lake Baikal. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:59, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, the only Lake Baikal one is this and it's not as good. PalauanLibertarian (talk) 13:06, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. --Aristeas (talk) 06:46, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:29, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:05, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Satellite_images#North_America

File:Courtyard Archway and Baskets, Palacio da Pena.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2023 at 10:41:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Portugal
Info created and uploaded by Y.ssk - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 10:41, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely composition! (PS: XS Max again) -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 10:41, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Slightly off-centre, seems too brightened. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:47, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Due to previous QI consensual review, I @ the supporters (@Ikan Kekek, GRDN711, and Cayambe: ) to vote here as well. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 12:15, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Canvassing, huh? SHB2000 (talk) 21:38, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For the sake of completeness, also pinging Steppro who, together with SHB2000, opposed it. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 17:33, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I supported it for QI, but I don't find it a great composition. It's an interesting picture, but I think the bottom part with the baskets is the most interesting part. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:47, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The tilt at bottom isn't really too noticeable until you look at it at full size, and I wonder if it's more subsidence of the floor. I do wish it could be a little sharper, but this is a nice mix of earth tones in a (to me) interesting composition. Daniel Case (talk) 16:32, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 11:44, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ранкові кольори. Панорама.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2023 at 14:23:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
Info created and uploaded by Zysko serhii - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 14:23, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:23, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A bit too posterised for my liking. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:14, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment SHB2000: Honestly, I am not a fan of votes based on liking and taste. You have the right to like or dislike an image, but support/opposition in FPC requires reasons beyond taste. IMHO if the effect or technique does not have a suitable result, it should be criticized from the technical aspect, not personal preferences. -- IamMM (talk) 10:43, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if you're specifically nitpicking my oppose vote solely because I said "for my liking", but it would have made no difference if I had said "A bit too posterised". I stand by my vote. SHB2000 (talk) 10:56, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
IMO, this is still just your personal taste without having provided a posterization standard for this style of photography. There has already been a related discussion here. -- IamMM (talk) 11:32, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I'll bite: what if I had replaced "posterisation" with "overprocessed"? What difference would that have made? SHB2000 (talk) 11:56, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It depends on how convincing the voter's explanation is. If it was only based on taste, I would still say the above points. I believe that the artistic goal of the photographer and her/his intention in using these settings should be considered. -- IamMM (talk) 12:46, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Let's take this back for a moment. If my oppose vote simply said "Too posterised"/"Too posterized" or "Too overprocessed", would you drop your battleground behaviour? Those are perfectly valid reasons for opposing a photo – you're just being acrimoniously nitpicky because I said "for my liking". Anyway, Ikan Kekek has already responded below to what I was going to say. SHB2000 (talk) 09:26, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I will ask the admins to take care of your offensive and disruptive behavior. These immature behaviors have no place in FPC. -- IamMM (talk) 13:17, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You're the one whose behaviour is seemingly immature, but I've made my argument on ANU. SHB2000 (talk) 08:46, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment No vote so far from me, but there is absolutely nothing wrong with SHB2000's oppose reasons. Posterization is a legitimate reason to oppose a nomination, and not liking it may be an insufficient reason, but it certainly suggests a lack of wow. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: I completely disagree with you. Votes, especially opposite votes, must be justified by common sense. This is a serious project with clear criteria, and voting based on "liking" is not one of them. If a particular user doesn't like black and white images, it doesn't mean that the reason for the opposition is justified. How did you come to the conclusion that the oppose vote here have anything to do with the lack of wow? -- IamMM (talk) 04:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Had he just said "It's not to my liking," I would agree that wouldn't really be sufficient to explain much, but the fact is "No wow" is acceptable, as is "Not an FP to me because x, y and z about the photo are not to my taste," though if someone simply made blanket oppose votes against all black & white photos (or all portraits, landscape photos, etc.), that would be a problem. But in any case, he says "A bit too posterised for my liking." That's completely legitimate and a normal reason to oppose considering a picture one of the greatest on the site. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was not convinced. You can have your opinion, but I still firmly believe that disliking posterization is not a valid reason in this case, just as it cannot be considered legitimate to disagree with a black and white art photo because of the lack of color. -- IamMM (talk) 06:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you want people to vote for a nomination, don't pick a fight about whether it's legitimate to oppose posterization. Most voters at FPC oppose posterization, and your pushing back about it left a bad taste in my mouth. Should I decide to vote for this photo, it won't be because I agree with your views about what constitutes legitimate opposition to declaring a photo one of the best on the site. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will disagree with anything I think is wrong whenever necessary and you are not in a position to give advice to others in this regard, also the taste in your mouth is your problem, not mine. I will not answer you until you learn to express your opinion politely. -- IamMM (talk) 07:26, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"[Y]ou are not in a position to give advice to others in this regard, also the taste in your mouth is your problem, not mine." – well, someone's being hypocritical here... --SHB2000 (talk) 09:18, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you have something to say, express it clearly and politely without sarcasm. Continuing to behave away from civility will only make me ignore you. -- IamMM (talk) 09:28, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Saying things sarcastically (or even satirically) does not constitute incivility; whether my comment above was even sarcastic is questionable, though. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment IamMM, you think I'm being impolite to say that this has left a bad taste in my mouth? Are you unfamiliar with the idiom? Otherwise, you are being absurd. There's nothing sarcastic or rude about my remark. Do you plan to complain about me at ANU, too? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:20, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My complaint was from another user's sarcasm, but the last sentence shows that you deserved it just as much. Relax, I don't feel like playing this game anymore. Goodbye I withdraw my nomination -- IamMM (talk) 16:31, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saslonch y Sela da Mont Sëuc.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2023 at 19:43:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 19:43, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 19:43, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 04:01, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice texture in the clouds. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:55, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 09:05, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 09:40, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 04:44, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:50, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A grand and beautiful scenery. --Aristeas (talk) 06:46, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:42, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:32, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:06, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:22, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 1 June 2023 (UTC) --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:04, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige

File:Geoffroy's tamarin (Saguinus geoffroyi) 2.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2023 at 18:36:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Callitrichidae (Marmosets and Tamarins)
Info No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:36, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:36, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PalauanLibertarian (talk) 16:27, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:34, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 04:41, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 08:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I imagine it wouldn't have been easy taking a shot like this. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We approached by boat and normally animals are much less spooked than when you are on foot. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good light and nice haircut :-) Is it possible to fix the weird transition between hair and background, under the neck? Basile Morin (talk) 00:10, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - have removed weird processing artefacts. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:40, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --BigDom (talk) 09:58, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:09, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:07, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:19, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 1 June 2023 (UTC) --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:03, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Callitrichidae (Marmosets and Tamarins)

File:Flower decorations at a wedding in India 04.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2023 at 17:57:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Rosaceae
Info all by Kritzolina -- Kritzolina (talk) 17:57, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kritzolina (talk) 17:57, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice flowers. I was going to ask why the tires, but I see Category:Tires as flowerpots. Odd, but a good job recycling them, I guess. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:42, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The world is full of rose photos and wedding photos, most of them kitschy. This one is refreshingly different, it’s the contrast with the tires that makes it exciting. --Aristeas (talk) 07:15, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:08, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ I'm all for breaking with the clichés, but to me this particular combination of yellow and two different pinks has a strange dissonance to it. File:Flower decorations at a wedding in India 03.jpg works much better for me. --El Grafo (talk) 08:25, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question Thank you very much for your constructive input, El Grafo. @Kritzolina: Maybe editing the contrast and color balance would help to enhance the photo a bit. I would do an edit at home tonight and send you the suggestion via WeTransfer. Would that be okay for you? Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 08:54, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help from you is always welcome, but please upload the new version yourself, so your contribution is visible to all. I trust you will make an visible improvement! Kritzolina (talk) 15:05, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New version uploaded Great, no problem. I have edited the color balance and contrast, in addition I have gently denoised the image. Hope the result is in your sense :) Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 15:45, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much!!! Kritzolina (talk) 15:53, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral now. --El Grafo (talk) 12:04, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Love the old tyres being recycled! --SHB2000 (talk) 08:40, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The crop is not ideal. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:51, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bettr crop but doesn't seem right - and the Michelin is upside down. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:30, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per El Grafo. Agree File:Flower decorations at a wedding in India 03.jpg is better. ~~Here the right side is strange, and impacts the composition~~. The painted "Michelin" looks like something one wants to hide, but was superficially done. Thus it's a bit awkward. Recycling is more poetic / successful in the other version showing different colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:46, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment That one is definitely better; agreed. (No commitment on how I would or wouldn't vote on it, though). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Let's wait for the nomination, first :-) Basile Morin (talk) 00:47, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree that the other one is better - for me the other one is a solid QI nothing more. I understand that all of you do not see the extra "wow" I feel this image has, but the other one definitely doesn't have it for me. --Kritzolina (talk) 06:24, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No worry. Just don't nominate the other one (so we won't have to review it). Then we'll see if this one passes -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:58, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question Thanks for your discussion. A crop might help make the composition clearer. @Kritzolina: Would the one suggested above be okay for you? If so, I'd do the edit. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 07:59, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, that crop would work for me. You are very kind, your help is truly appreciated! Kritzolina (talk) 08:49, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New version uploaded Edit: The image has been cropped on the right to improve the composition. @Kritzolina: Maybe it would be useful if you ping the reviewers to notify about the change. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:12, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you again - pinging @Basile Morin, @Charlesjsharp, @El Grafo, @Ikan Kekek for review of the new version. Kritzolina (talk) 10:01, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification, but sorry, the more I look at this picture, the more I realize that the strong smell of the rubber tire is not really compatible with that of roses, especially in a wedding. At least I would not approach my nose, personally -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:57, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I guess the clash is part of what I like about this image, but I can understand your perspective. Kritzolina (talk) 18:41, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Aristeas. BigDom (talk) 05:34, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others, mainly due to the crops. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:23, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Better with the new crop. I'm not convinced to support, so far, but I'll cross out my vote while I consider this version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:09, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good with the new crop. Yann (talk) 19:19, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:47, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:28, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — PalauanLibertarian (talk) 21:05, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:57, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Rosaceae

File:Vilnius - Panorama 02.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2023 at 01:15:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Lithuania
Info created and uploaded by Lestath - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 01:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overprocessed with quite a low level of detail on buildings and trees. Burned sky on half of the picture -- Jakubhal 04:06, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Jakubhal, except that I don't know if it's overprocessed. Would this have been an FP in 2008? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:02, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Yes, the sky seems burnt. Also the crane is distracting. Harsh light. And overall the content is not really spectacular in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:06, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. --Peulle (talk) 11:42, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blown sky notwithstanding, this is really not a very interesting cityscape from this angle due to the level terrain and the low buildings. What might be interesting, a juxtaposition of this vintage cityscape against the more modern skyline, is off at the right rear under that sky. Daniel Case (talk) 17:39, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:06, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monastère Agios Stefanos - Météores (GR44) - 2022-03-22 - 47.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2023 at 02:50:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Greece
Info created and uploaded by Chabe01 - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 02:50, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Taken with an iPhone 13 Pro; in favorable light conditions, the iPhone's camera arguably can do a good job. -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 02:50, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but I disagree. This picture lacks details. The texture of the rocks and fields below is washed out. -- Jakubhal 03:59, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Jakubhal. Why are you determined to nominate iPhone pics, in particular, to prove some kind of point? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:00, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose; now you're on the verge of being disruptive to prove a point... --SHB2000 (talk) 08:33, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pretty good composition, but the technical quality is somewhat lacking.--Peulle (talk) 11:41, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Pretty, but technically indeed a bit modest. That’s a pity, I would love to see more excellent photos of the wonderful Meteora monasteries … --Aristeas (talk) 06:50, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, unsharp areas of rock formation near center of image pretty much compels this. A shame because it's very well composed given the light, and captures the harshness of early spring expertly. Daniel Case (talk) 17:42, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:07, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tournenie (HS85-10-21122).jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2023 at 05:59:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by William John Winter, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:59, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:59, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment They could eliminate tilt in those days! Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:50, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I did rotate it substantially. Any more and I'd need to cut some of the window, though, and was worried about that. Plus he started to look tilted. Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I took it a little further. Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:25, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:13, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — PalauanLibertarian (talk) 21:06, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 06:45, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I feel like this is a Valued Image and that the tilt and what I perceive as problems with handling the strong light and shadow make this not an FP, despite his striking face. However, I'm not so confident about my vote, since I am not too knowledgeable about the capabilities of the camera Winter used, so I've made this a comment instead of an opposing vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:36, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:02, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Forte de Copacabana panorama.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2023 at 20:47:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Brazil
Info created by Gabriel Heusi - uploaded by Chronus - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 20:47, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 20:47, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 10:00, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I dislike how the focus is on the water instead of the city itself. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:00, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--RodRabelo7 (talk) 15:07, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I wish the sky in back were more interesting, but then again it is wintertime. Daniel Case (talk) 18:01, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:03, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — PalauanLibertarian (talk) 20:59, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Apart from the low level of detail it is tilted (and lacks a perspective correction) Poco a poco (talk) 20:21, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree the picture is tilted, leaning to the left -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:00, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:04, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plantago lanceolata - Kulna.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2023 at 15:04:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Plantaginaceae
Info all by Ivar (talk) 15:04, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 15:04, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:20, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 09:04, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:56, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 13:59, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:09, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very impressive at full size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:26, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 04:41, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:59, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alex Florstein (talk) 07:03, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:08, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:15, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:09, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Plantaginaceae

File:Weevil (Cholus cinctus) Anton Valley.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2023 at 21:26:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Curculionidae (Snout Beetles/Weevils)
Info All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:26, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:26, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive, and who knew weevils were so cool-looking? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:49, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 03:31, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 04:38, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Ikan. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support That's really a special nose :-) Basile Morin (talk) 00:30, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 09:55, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 10:57, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:14, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:13, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice guy. --Aristeas (talk) 07:57, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:16, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 13:10, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:26, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 07:39, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods#Family : Curculionidae (Snout Beetles/Weevils)

File:LakeBalkhash colorful.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2023 at 21:45:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Satellite_images#Asia
Info created by en:Sentinel-2 - uploaded by PalauanLibertarian - nominated by PalauanLibertarian

Similar to the Lake St. Clair nomination and that received support so thought I’d try this. -- PalauanLibertarian (talk) 21:45, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- PalauanLibertarian (talk) 21:45, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Colorful and interesting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:49, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 03:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 08:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:27, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very colourful! --SHB2000 (talk) 11:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 15:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:35, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:54, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:14, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:08, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 11:49, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:23, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:57, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:16, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:27, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 07:39, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Satellite_images#Asia

File:Tuinen Mien Ruys (d.j.b.) 04.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2023 at 05:12:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales
Info Mien Ruys Gardens. Hemerocallis 'Happy Returns'.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:12, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:12, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice, but below current FP standard. Too busy background IMO. Yann (talk) 19:16, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per yann. --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 02:24, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — PalauanLibertarian (talk) 20:56, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cluttered background. Not special enough for FP -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:06, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too busy, per others. Daniel Case (talk) 03:28, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 08:34, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:National road 970 and river Teno near Gistugurra, Utsjoki, Lapland, Finland, 2021 September.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2023 at 10:09:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Finland
Info created and uploaded by Ximonic - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 10:09, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nominating this purely because of its composition. Love how the road draws your eyes towards the beautiful Lapland scenery. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:09, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful calming picture for me. The red posts on the left and right are somewhat distracting, but minor.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:41, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This view makes me want to cycle down this slope -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:07, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed; I'd love to cycle down this slope, too. Not so sure about the ride up, though (I guess it wouldn't be too hard with an MTB, but still...) ;-). SHB2000 (talk) 04:27, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:53, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 04:48, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:19, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:19, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:35, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 02:23, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:17, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:06, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I seem to be the odd person out here, but IMHO, whle this image has some good elements, there is too much pavement and not enough wow. I want to crop it horizonatlly just in front of the line in the road, and that works a little better. --GRDN711 (talk) 22:20, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@GRDN711: Could it perhaps be cropped to where the metal barrier starts? (sorry, I can't annotate this on the image itself since I'm on a Mac and don't have a mouse with me) SHB2000 (talk) 09:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I personally think the original looks better than the crop. PalauanLibertarian (talk) 21:53, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 04:43, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Autumn in the Arctic. A wonderful reminder that season exists. Daniel Case (talk) 04:09, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Famberhorst and Daniel. --Aristeas (talk) 06:45, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:20, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I prefer the crop. Here the focus is too much on the pavement in the front --Lupe (talk) 16:35, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:16, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 20:24, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#Finland

~~Oppose~~ Per Lupe. -- Hamid Hassani (talk) 21:00, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid vote: Voting ended on June 4, 2023 at 10:09 a.m. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:20, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mero (Epinephelus marginatus), Cabo de Palos, España, 2022-07-15, DD 34.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2023 at 12:59:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Serranidae_(Serranids)
Info Male dusky grouper (Epinephelus marginatus), Cape Palos, Spain. Dusky grouper (Epinephelus marginatus) of about 150 centimetres (59 in) length and 60 kilograms (130 lb). This species is demersal, normally found in and around rocky reefs from surface waters down to as much as 300 metres in depth. It often occurs in the vicinity of beds of Posidonia sea grass. Dusky grouper adults are solitary and territorial, preferring areas with a rocky substrate but both adults and juveniles will enter brackish waters, such as estuaries. Their main food is molluscs, crustaceans, and octopuses. E. marginatus is a protogynous hermaphrodite. They attain sexual maturity at quite a late age, females begin to breed when they are around five years of age, and then between their 9th and 16th years (reaching a lengh of at lest 100 centimetres (39 in)) they change into males, most commonly at 12. They are reported to live for up to 50 years. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 12:59, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:59, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really impressive. --Yann (talk) 15:49, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Imagine that your head fits in his mouth... :) Poco a poco (talk) 16:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Yann, and I really like how you captured its eye looking backwards. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:35, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 20:44, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. Sharpness, DoF, and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:50, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 03:59, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Funny creature. I'd shift the dehaze or the clarity slider a bit in order to give a tiny bit more contrast. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:51, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:31, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 06:12, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:23, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Clément Bardot (talk) 08:05, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 09:53, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:36, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cbrescia (talk) 18:50, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:34, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KTC (talk) 22:27, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alex Florstein (talk) 07:01, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:48, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Argenberg (talk) 11:56, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:07, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:00, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. --Aristeas (talk) 08:03, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:16, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:53, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 10:59, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 20:21, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Serranidae_(Serranids)

File:Anémona incrustante amarilla (Parazoanthus axinellae), Parque natural de la Arrábida, Portugal, 2022-07-20, DD 49.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2023 at 08:36:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Anthozoa
Info Yellow cluster anemone (Parazoanthus axinellae), Arrábida National Park, Portugal. Actually, it isn't an anemome but a zoanthid coral found on the temperate eastern Atlantic coasts of Europe and in the Mediterranean Sea and at depths between 23 and 45 metres (75 and 148 ft) on rocky substrates. Zoanthids differ from true sea anemones, in having a different internal anatomy and in forming true colonies in which the individual animals (polyps) are connected by a common tissue, called the coenenchyme. Each polyp has twenty-four to thirty-six tentacles disposed in two whorls. The polyps are 5 millimetres (0.20 in) in diameter and 20 millimetres (0.79 in) in height. Note: we have no FPs of the whole order Zoantharia. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 08:36, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Please, note that this is a macro shot of a tiny animal underwater. -- Poco a poco (talk) 08:36, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:24, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 13:43, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 14:59, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom - 5 mm in diameter! Pretty animal. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:26, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KTC (talk) 22:33, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alex Florstein (talk) 07:02, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:48, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:17, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:16, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:00, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hamid Hassani (talk) 21:18, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 20:22, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class_:_Anthozoa

File:Ruins in Charleston, South Carolina by George N. Barnard - crop.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2023 at 05:37:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical#1850-1900
Info created by George N. Barnard - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great photo in excellent condition. I don't understand the restoration, though. Why did you make those small changes in particular? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:27, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's a few restorations back. Generally, I'm removing scratches and dust, if you want to ask about a specific change...

I should note I did have a second copy to look at, which helped a bit. Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I compared this version to the first version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:39, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, pretty sure that was fading at the edges, not just clouds. If you look at File:Ruins_in_Charleston,_South_Carolina_by_George_N._Barnard_-_Original.jpg there's clear diagonal damage streaks where the lighter parts are. Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:42, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, lots of them! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:46, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Yann (talk) 15:48, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Never war again.--Ermell (talk) 19:39, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There are always wars. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:09, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:39, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:42, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:16, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:00, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:59, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hamid Hassani (talk) 21:14, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:07, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1850-1900

File:Saint Maurice church in Auzits (5).jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2023 at 11:06:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 11:06, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 11:06, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dull light, gray sky, and the very classic bottom-up angle is a bit boring in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't oppose the angle of view, but I do agree that you like relatively undramatic overcast skies more than I do. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:42, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 09:31, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Babia Góra, 20230304 0651 3162.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2023 at 03:31:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Natural_phenomena#Snow
Info Hiking trail from the Babia Góra peak in a ground blizzard after sunrise. All be me -- Jakubhal 03:31, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 03:31, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 06:19, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:21, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:53, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:06, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 04:58, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:19, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 14:21, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Appealing view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:48, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:14, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:22, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:53, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:35, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:49, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:20, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural_phenomena#Snow

File:Serra del Cadi (1).jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2023 at 11:08:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 11:08, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 11:08, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This view point definitely has potential, however, under these cloudy weather conditions, the washed out colors are not very attractive in my view, that's why I don't consider this picture as one of the best landscapes of the site, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:13, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose per Basile, but I'd like to see this in more colorful light or light that enables the landscape to have more color. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:38, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support It’s really a pity about the subdued light and flat colours. But this landscape looks so carefully arranged, the mountains, the hills, the trees and even the buildings draped with a discreet, but wonderful elegance like by an artist that I cannot hesitate to support, sorry ;–). The chapel on the hill and the sunlight on the snowy summits are the icing on the cake. --Aristeas (talk) 08:33, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile. -- Karelj (talk) 16:52, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:14, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malmöhus slott 2022.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2023 at 14:56:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Sweden
Info created & uploaded by Kateryna Baiduzha – nominated by Ivar (talk) 14:56, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 14:56, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great color combination and image composition; love the dramatic sky. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:07, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:10, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question Nice light but why is the sky much darker in the center than on the sides? Also this picture contains no embedded color profile -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:17, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Yeah, the differences in the colors in the sky are quite weird. Otherwise, the photo is beautiful, but I won't vote for it while it's like this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:13, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The sky looks unnatural --Lupe (talk) 11:04, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Lupe. I wish SvartKat would edit suitably, instead, but since nothing has changed, I have to conclude that this striking picture is not one of the greatest on the site. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:31, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:09, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above, I would reconsider my vote if the darker area in the middle of the sky is fixed Poco a poco (talk) 20:16, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 04:01, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 11:49, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:18, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Tempered support I'd like to see a more uniform sky, too, but it's not a dealbreaker for me. Daniel Case (talk) 18:53, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unrealistic sky and color space missing -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:35, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The sky looks unusual, but not unrealistic to me. --LexKurochkin (talk) 12:47, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:16, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile Morin. -- Hamid Hassani (talk) 21:04, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:04, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Sweden

File:Pinto Beans Seeds.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2023 at 20:21:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Food
Info created by sanjay_ach - uploaded by sanjay_ach - nominated by Sanjay ach -- Sanjay Acharya (talk) 20:21, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sanjay Acharya (talk) 20:21, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question where's the wow factor? --SHB2000 (

talk) 11:56, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understand the photo may not appear wow due to its color/setup but in its category this is a picture of high quality and resolution and adds significant value to Wikimedia’s image collection in this category. Sanjay Acharya (talk) 15:30, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not a showy Wow, but definitely one of our best of staple food items --Kritzolina (talk) 16:28, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PalauanLibertarian (talk) 13:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 15:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:25, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good quality image, but I do not see any reason for the FP nomination. -- Karelj (talk) 21:09, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Karelj: Perfectily fine for VI and QI, but lacks WOW for FP. --El Grafo (talk) 08:02, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The wow is in the details, and I find the circular composition pleasing. BigDom (talk) 09:56, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Deserving, IMO. I think it's odd that circular photos of closeups of food items sometimes pass and sometimes fail. I've had one or two similar nominations fail as having "no wow" while others passed unanimously or nearly so. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:28, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:33, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:09, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:46, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:53, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Karelj. I'm sorry! -- Hamid Hassani (talk) 20:54, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food_and_drink#Food

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lesser violetear (Colibri cyanotus).jpg

File:Орусъярви, озеро Мюллюлампи сверху.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2023 at 01:00:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia
Info created and uploaded by Красный, nominated by RodRabelo7. RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:30, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 09:04, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:14, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Natural flag of Brazil? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 09:25, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Как красиво! Книжная пыль (talk) 09:42, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 09:48, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Third open nomination by the same user. --Kritzolina (talk) 09:58, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support without prejudice to Kritzolina's comment (i.e. purely based on its artistic value). Should this nomination be placed on hold (or something like that)? --SHB2000 (talk) 12:02, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:30, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Kritzolina and Iifar, I have transferred the nomination of the picture to me and removed the {{FPD}} template. Please revert me if I could not have done such a thing. Best regards, RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:33, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:21, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Hamid Hassani (talk) 20:49, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:40, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:25, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:05, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:01, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:41, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Russia

File:В самом центре России.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2023 at 12:00:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Siberian Federal District
Info created and uploaded by Evasyagina - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 12:00, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:00, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:20, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:14, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:24, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe a bit dark, but very beautiful. --Aristeas (talk) 08:23, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:15, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 13:06, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:44, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:13, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hamid Hassani (talk) 20:51, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A very good example of shutter control. --Peulle (talk) 08:17, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:25, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:07, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, subject has been done before but this one is accomplished and shows care and thought in execution. --GRDN711 (talk) 20:51, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:21, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:37, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Russia#Siberian Federal District

File:Кронштадт, Николаевский док сверху зимой.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2023 at 16:19:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Russia
Info created by Красный - uploaded by Красный - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 16:19, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 16:19, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting and very good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:24, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:47, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 04:39, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:15, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:25, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 15:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good image, but nothing special for the FP nomination. -- Karelj (talk) 21:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 19:20, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alex Florstein (talk) 07:02, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good image but I prefer your other one of the Alekseevsky dry dock that has a ship in it. --GRDN711 (talk) 09:06, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please link the category "WLM/7831052007" to a superior category --Llez (talk) 16:11, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's a technical category of Russian Wiki Loves Monuments lists and in general it doesn't linked anywhere, but creates galleries for different objects. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 06:33, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting Poco a poco (talk) 20:14, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Уникально и качественно. Анастасия Львова^ru/en 09:48, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:31, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:50, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:55, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:16, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Karelj. I'm Sorry! -- Hamid Hassani (talk) 21:07, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:21, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Industry#Russia

File:Ramsauer Dolomiten II.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2023 at 14:19:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
Info I recently nominated another version of this image. But it was declined because of a too tight cut at the top. Now the motif with a more generous crop at the top. The southern face of the Reiter Alpe is shown. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 14:19, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 14:19, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:15, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 13:05, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support These kinds of photos fascinate me. The airplane stripe bothers me a bit.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:06, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 16:07, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:34, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 21:55, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:46, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good light and nice details on the rock faces. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:51, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:30, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hamid Hassani (talk) 20:52, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 08:16, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:24, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:09, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:22, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:24, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria

File:Candle at the Trinity College Chapel, Oxford-L1002981.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2023 at 02:42:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#United_Kingdom
Info A different approach to photographing the interior of a church – more intimate… (c/u/n) --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:42, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:42, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive to me; contemplative mood. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:35, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice, I think I'll forgo the wide-angle lens next time I plan to visit a church! I also appreciate the clever use of lighting, and the careful choice of composition and depth of field. How hard is it to nail manual focus on a 60 MP rangefinder camera? --Julesvernex2 (talk) 11:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I love manual focussing and I've used manual focus lenses even on DSLRs and mirrorless cameras. For the M11, it's generally easy. In this case, it was difficult, because I shot this wide open (M series cameras don't record the aperture correctly, they just guess it – so please ignore the Exif data) and even a small movement made a difference. This is a handheld shot in difficult lighting conditions, so technique matters. Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Randomianin. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why did you choose a bent candle? Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:36, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Because this specific one had the best light on it and the best background. I'm pretty obsessed about details like that and usually "work the scene" quite a lot. Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In the Low Saxon language of the region my family originates from, we'd also say "En beten scheef hett Gott leef", which translates to "God likes things that are crooked (meaning not perfect)" :-) Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:23, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I was about to suggest "Bent but unbroken" as a backstory for the image, but that one is way better :) --Julesvernex2 (talk) 17:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well they do say that most of academia leans to the left... Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:15, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
*lol* Just this conversation made the shot worth being nominated. Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:55, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Does that have any similarity to the Jesuit saying that "God writes straight with crooked lines"? Daniel Case (talk) 16:19, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 15:51, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice candle, but I do not see any reason for the FP nomination. Just candle... -- Karelj (talk) 21:00, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Just a candle ... but an amazing and captivating image of it, capturing the atmosphere perfectly. --Kritzolina (talk) 06:53, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good compo and interesting light.--Ermell (talk) 20:02, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:40, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:15, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:18, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 23:23, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:22, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. --Aristeas (talk) 07:58, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Awesome. --LexKurochkin (talk) 12:44, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:16, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Karelj. Sorry! -- Hamid Hassani (talk) 21:11, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose The background is kind of busy, and I thought at first this was a beer tap, so I was wondering why it was in glass. Daniel Case (talk) 16:20, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:22, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#United_Kingdom

File:A man and his donkey on the way back from the field in Aswan, Egypt (edited).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2023 at 09:35:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info A man and his donkey on the way back from the field in Aswan, Egypt. As the photographer put it in the original description, they are “helping each other” “like friends”. The original photo was a Highly Commended winner of the 2020 Wiki Loves Africa contest. I have retouched the file to reduce background CAs etc.; because the original has been awarded the Highly Commended and the QI status, I have uploaded the retouched version as a new file with a more descriptive filename. Created by Mohamed Hozyen – edited and nominated by --Aristeas (talk) 09:35, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A typical everyday scene from rural Egypt, simple, realistic and very human. --Aristeas (talk) 09:35, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:15, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support No doubt: top 3 POTY! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 12:32, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The parts of the person behind the cart are a bit disturbing but still good enough for me.--Ermell (talk) 13:03, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for all the work you put into pictures like this, and all the other things you do to make other people's images shine. --Kritzolina (talk) 14:14, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A beautiful authentic photo from a (satisfied?) culture that we in the west actually no longer recognize, and indeed, tribute to Aristeas for the great work he often does here.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:43, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --August Geyler (talk) 16:28, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:31, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:54, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 21:52, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KTC (talk) 23:55, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is an interesting photo, special in its kind. The crop is tight at the bottom, and the colors a bit dull, but still acceptable in my view. Exotic, like an image which tells a story -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. The only edits I really notice are the elimination of some small white spots in the upper left quadrant. What did I miss? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:46, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Nothing important ;–). In the original photo the background shows some traces of purple and garish green CAs, especially at trees and around the wagon at the right (look e.g. at the number ٥٤٥ = 545 on the wagon). The CAs are not strong, but IMHO they make the bokeh rather busy; so reducing them makes the photo a bit more harmonious. And, above all, I expected that people could oppose because of these CAs. ;–) --Aristeas (talk) 08:18, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:50, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 10:48, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 12:38, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:12, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:18, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 08:15, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:23, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:12, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 11:50, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:22, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 17:18, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:18, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People at work

File:CH.ZG.Zug Boardstock 2008-07-27 Wakeboarder 27 16x9-R 4K.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2023 at 10:17:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual water sports
Info created & uploaded by Roy Egloff - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:17, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:17, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:06, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question What are the white dots near the water droplets? --SHB2000 (talk) 12:38, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question slight tilt? Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:23, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed here PalauanLibertarian (talk) 17:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool photo. I do think there is a slight tilt, but I'm not sure that's very important in this kind of picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For some, like me, a slight tilt is a no no. You should know that if I come to your house I will have to straighten the pictures on the walls! Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:12, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hah! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:45, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh deary me – I have several pictures on my walls deliberately at a 30° or 45° angle (

{\frac {\pi }{6}}

or

{\frac {\pi }{4}}

if you prefer using radians). Time to go to Bunnings and get some extra screws... /s. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:50, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My first port of call when I visit Australia this November is Perth, so I'll head straight to Bunnings in Subiaco. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:24, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thankfully I live over 4000 km from Subiaco. Oh wait! I'll be in Western Australia around the same time... /s. SHB2000 (talk) 10:24, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Karelj (talk) 20:46, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:36, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:10, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 03:34, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry for being the party pooper once more, but this doesn't quite work for me. It doesn't transmit the same kind of character and energy our best water sports images offer. The subject feels just awkwardly frozen in mid-air, face hidden, without much sense of movement - I can't even guess which direction he's turning. A slightly slower shutter speed to get a little bit of motion blur on the faster moving body parts could have improved this dramatically, imho. --El Grafo (talk) 14:27, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:18, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice but the resolution is pretty low Poco a poco (talk) 20:11, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Hazy background but impressive acrobatics -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:57, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 12:34, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per El Grafo. Sorry! -- Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:45, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose doesn't quite hold up to the other images in the gallery IMHO --Lupe (talk) 10:11, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:13, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports#Individual water sports

File:Clavelina lepadiformis - Mar Piccolo.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2023 at 12:17:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Ascidiacea
Info created & uploaded by Roberto Strafella – nominated by Ivar (talk) 12:17, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 12:17, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 13:04, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The subject is sharp and I like the light shining in the background as artistic element --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:58, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't see the logic for the chosen crop. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:10, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 21:56, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Agree with Charlesjsharp about crop. -- PalauanLibertarian (talk) 23:57, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very beautiful and unusual structure. Nevertheless, like Charles and PalauanLibertarian, I find the current crop a bit awkward, and thus suggest a square framing (see image note on the nomination page) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If there are people like Ikan Kekek who prefer this version, you may choose to offer an alternative and see which one of both is the most successful. I personally abstain from voting for now -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:41, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support I really feel the volumes of the sea squirts, which are photographed with admirable sharpness and detail. I prefer this to a square crop that would get rid of most of the light on the upper left. Instead, I'd prefer a slightly more generous crop on the bottom, but I accept and judge the photo as it is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:11, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 10:58, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 12:39, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support due to the crop — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:12, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 20:16, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:38, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great finding, Ivar. I've never seen a colony of light-bulb sea squirts as nice as this one. I agree though that the crop is pretty awkward. Poco a poco (talk) 08:11, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan and Poco a Poco. --Aristeas (talk) 09:11, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:15, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:29, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:23, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 10:31, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:15, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class_:_Ascidiacea

File:Great Sphinx of Giza (أبو الهول).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2023 at 13:39:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Egypt
Info Great Sphinx of Giza. My work. --Mile (talk) 13:39, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 13:39, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:32, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support You really capture the monumentality of this wonder of the world, without including hordes of tourists, and the one man gives a sense of the vast scale of this monument. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:04, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Ikan Kekek True, that man to compare size of it. @Basile Morin Quality is very fine for (just) 1 inch senzor, i think optics cover it - 20 MPx. Light, could not be so sure, it was some wind - clouds went to red. I had yellow sunglas. Who knows. --Mile (talk) 12:12, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Lupe (talk) 10:45, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quality, composition and light are fine -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:18, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfectly captures a monumental wonder of the world! --SHB2000 (talk) 12:17, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:27, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is it categorized at Category:Great Sphinx of Giza? I cannot see it. RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:48, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Mile (talk) 08:20, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:15, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Peulle (talk) 08:14, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:17, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support But nose is missing. --Milseburg (talk) 14:49, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

;–) The reason is explained here. --Aristeas (talk) 07:24, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly, but nobody nose. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:02, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

:-) Basile Morin (

talk) 01:09, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What Aristeas means is that you will have to read the comic and not its wiki article to find out why :) (no I won't spoil anyone here). Edit, moved my comment to the left to emphasise it's a reply to Aristeas'. Sorry Charles :) But thank you for the pun explanation! And I highly recommend that classic comic :) - Benh (talk) 21:37, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 22:14, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--RodRabelo7 (talk) 03:25, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:28, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:25, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:41, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 8 June 2023 (UTC) --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:51, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Egypt

File:Кронштадт, Алексеевский док сверху зимой (2).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2023 at 19:03:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships
Info created by Красный - uploaded by Красный - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 19:03, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 19:03, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Kaganer (talk) 19:17, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --SHB2000 (talk) 21:49, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alex Florstein (talk) 07:00, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 08:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Politically incorrect to award warships of the Russian Navy nowadays Poco a poco (talk) 20:07, 1 June 2023 (UTC) Sorry Poco, but invalid reason to oppose. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:46, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Is this serious? RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:58, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Absurd! Excellent photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:04, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question Since when has FPC become a place to oppose a photo because of its political nature? SHB2000 (talk) 10:02, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support В первую очередь это уникальный вид Кронштадта, специфика города при этом никуда не денется. Анастасия Львова^ru/en 09:47, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:59, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 22:30, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:21, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:16, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 12:35, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:20, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:46, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:46, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 07:21, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships

File:Flims Waldhaus in Graubünden 17-09-2022. (actm.) 26.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2023 at 04:22:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons (Graubünden)
Info Waldhaus Flims, upper Rhineschlucht, view of the Rheinschlucht natural monument from uitzichtplatform viewing platform (Natural phenomenon/Natural monument) Impressive view of the upper Rhine gorge.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Really striking, and definitely a serious FP candidate, but I'm not loving the haze in this context. But, again, the foreground is so striking. So I'm undecided. I might like the photo better with more sky. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:24, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment, because I was on a tower I couldn't go further back. If I had wanted more sky in the photo, it would have been at the expense of the bottom of the photo and the slanted flank with the trees at the bottom left would have been partially lost. If you want I can accentuate the clouds a bit more.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:42, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't suggest that. I still might vote for this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:45, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:15, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Washed up colors and dull sky. Sorry, no wow -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:51, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:16, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile Morin. Sorry! -- Hamid Hassani (talk) 04:56, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile; the "Grau" in the canton's name doesn't mean that pictures of it have to be subdued. Daniel Case (talk) 16:26, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 9 June 2023 (UTC) --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:35, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bahama banks.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2023 at 21:50:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Satellite_images#North_America
Info created by Sentinel-2 - uploaded by ⍨PLib - nominated by ⍨PLib -- ⍨PLib (talk) 21:50, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info Not sure what people think of the border created by combining the two separate images. We could just crop it out, but I think I personally think it's better this way. -- PalauanLibertarian (talk) 21:50, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ⍨PLib (talk) 21:50, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose Huge stitching issue. Very visible transition. Also too contrasted. The link to the source on the file page is wrong (please give the address of the original image) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:29, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Basile Morin Would you support a crop to get rid of the stitching? Also the source is correct. ⍨PLib^🗣️ 01:42, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No (and for other reasons), and the source links to a map, not to an image. Where does this image come from? Where can we find it on the web? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can't find it on the web. The source I added is where I download the raw satellite data then use QGIS to make it look normal. I didn't edit the colors, that's just how it looks. ⍨PLib^🗣️ 11:39, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Top and bottom are of different colors / intensity. Technically wrong, and the original remains a mystery. How can we check? -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:03, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Heres the raw data download link if you want.

https://scihub.copernicus.eu/dhus/odata/v1/Products('7f0f9cae-c2f1-4322-a222-9c94906ec076')/$value ⍨PLib^🗣️ 14:56, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Login + password required to connect -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:29, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I know. You can create an account on the main website. ⍨PLib^🗣️ 15:17, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I wouldn't support the cropped version is because this content does not impress me as a picture with an extraordinary visual impact. Sorry but I don't find this particular formation awesome. Not all Google satellite captures are spectacular either, to offer a comparison. The strong contrasts are unaesthetic, and the diversity of the colors quite limited. No wow, but it is just my subjectively view, of course. If freely licensed, this image may be educational in some way, but in any case I would suggest to avoid the technically deficient collage -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:06, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think what this needs is a better explanation. I'm intrigued by the image, but I feel like I have to do a bunch of research to make sense of what I'm seeing. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:39, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Here's the image zoomed out. ⍨PLib^🗣️ 14:56, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So it's just a satellite picture of an underwater formation? If so, I don't understand Basile's objection beyond the obvious seam. That obvious separation of tiles is going to prevent this from being featurable, but it's probably fixable. It's not misaligned or warped -- it's just a different tone, which shouldn't be that hard to fix in Photoshop. It's an interesting image with a lot of educational value -- I don't see why it wouldn't be featurable with that fixed. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 01:45, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Here's a version from a different date without a crease

Bahama banks sentinel2.jpg ⍨PLib^🗣️ 14:59, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Big stitching problem.--Peulle (talk) 08:01, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawing and nominating a version with no stitching issue. ⍨PLib^🗣️ 12:50, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red and Gold for Niño.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2023 at 06:49:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created and uploaded by Herbertkikoy - nominated by Kritzolina -- Kritzolina (talk) 06:49, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kritzolina (talk) 06:49, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Herbertkikoy (talk) 07:17, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive! --SHB2000 (talk) 08:14, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question @Herbertkikoy: Any chance we might get a bigger resolution? 4MP seems small nowadays and is less than a quarter of this camera's full size. BigDom (talk) 09:51, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great photo. Higher resolution would be even better, but I understand the need to crop images taken of crowds. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:22, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per BigDom. -- Ivar (talk) 18:35, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of the most beautiful ones of this year's WLF competition; hope for a higher resolution. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:34, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:51, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Original and nice compo but the resolution is too low IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 20:12, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Would remove oppose vote with full resolution image uploaded. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:18, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't think a higher resolution would add much more to this image -- PalauanLibertarian (talk) 02:03, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 08:03, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:01, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:16, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:49, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:15, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Per Poco a poco & Charlesisharp. Actually sorry! -- Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:10, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:42, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:47, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice capture, particularly the hilarious smile in the background, but low resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:36, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Herbert Kikoy Thank you all for the mixed support. For some reason, I dont know how to replace the file. Good or Bad, positive or negative, I appreciate all the traction this image got. Thank you

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 18:16, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Events

File:Sunset, Kuta, Bali, Indonesia, 20220825 1752 0877.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2023 at 13:35:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Natural_phenomena#Sun
Info Sunset on the beach in Kuta, Bali. All by me -- Jakubhal 13:35, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 13:35, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment there is something like a dust or bird neard the sun (and this sun is too bright and distracting) --Ezarateesteban 23:07, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That was a bird, cloned out. Withdrawing, as there is no support. ---- Jakubhal 04:46, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination -- Jakubhal 04:46, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Jakubhal: Maybe it was a bit too early to withdraw the nomination. I have the impression that many of our regulars cannot visit this page every day (and why should they?), so they may not even have looked at the nomination. You lose nothing by waiting a bit longer for votes, so I would encourage you to have a bit more patience with us ;–). Best, --Aristeas (talk) 15:04, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Aristeas: Thank you for your support and advice. Perhaps I really rushed here. However, I've noticed that most good photos get a few upvotes on their first day. Maybe for this one, it would work out later. Hard to say. I'll go through the photos from this series again, and maybe I'll nominate one of them. ---- Jakubhal 15:40, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I quite understand. All the best, --Aristeas (talk) 20:20, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: X support, X oppose, X neutral → not featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 13:41, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gostra malta.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2023 at 01:52:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual_sports
Info A contestant of a Maltese Gostra game falls off the greasy pole.
Info created by Jonathan borg - uploaded by Jonathan borg - nominated by PalauanLibertarian -- PalauanLibertarian (talk) 01:52, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PalauanLibertarian (talk) 01:52, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Totally insufficient description, must be improved. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:48, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Disturbing foreground object covering the person.--Peulle (talk) 07:59, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info @Peulle, Ikan Kekek: Relevant info added according to the file's use in en:Greasy pole. --El Grafo (talk) 10:06, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. PalauanLibertarian (talk) 12:01, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:24, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cluttered + blurry background-- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support With the description, I find this a compelling and almost surreal photo. Why is a blurred background a problem? It's not the subject but helps set the scene. We have featured photos before in which the background is blurred but with recognizable outlines and the subject is a bird. So why is this one unacceptable? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:52, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. A sharp background would be disastrous for such a photo – only because the background is properly out of focus the subject becomes recognizable. And at the same time the soft background adds atmosphere to the photo and shows that we are in Malta. --Aristeas (talk) 07:50, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:52, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I can agree with Peulle that the church on the background is taking wiever's attention from the person. Mostly this is because person is backgrounded by shady side of a church. Changing angle a bit to place person on a projection of church facade would be FP with no objections. Sorry. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 13:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agree the guy is in the shadow, and in front of a shadowy side of the building. As a consequence it's really the last element one notices when looking at this image, after the flags, the beam, and the blurry eye-catching facade. This man is supposed to be central, unfortunately we just see his back, behind the beam, dark, and like camouflaged -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:33, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose Interesting subject, but the salience isn't good IMO. It took too long to work out what I was looking at. Maybe if the falling man was in front of the pole so we could see his face, or he wasn't in such deep shadow, or the church in the background wasn't so bright, it could work. BigDom (talk) 14:28, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMHO, it’s a FP due to the WOW factor. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:38, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination ⍨PLib^🗣️ 00:33, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viale Antonio Gramsci 16, forte 16, terrazza, veduta verso cupole di s. m. del fiore e della sinagoga 07.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2023 at 14:41:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings
Info created by Sailko - uploaded by Sailko - nominated by Sailko -- Sailko (talk) 14:41, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sailko (talk) 14:41, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It would have been sensible to take this to QI first. Unsharp and red edge to dome and hills. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:53, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I withdraw my nomination. --Sailko (talk) 15:01, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emily Wilding Davison by Andrew William Dron.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2023 at 11:19:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by Andrew William Dron - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:19, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:19, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good photo and well restored. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:47, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 07:55, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:02, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:35, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:45, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:21, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden's top work as always! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:33, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 10:39, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:51, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 10 June 2023 (UTC) --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:27, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Women

File:Mauritius grey white-eye (Zosterops mauritianus).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2023 at 09:27:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Zosteropidae (White-eyes)
Info This bird is endemic to the island of Mauritius - i.e. it only can be found there. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:27, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:27, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 11:26, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:29, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:56, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Small resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:18, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not by comparison with the barn swallow FPC. It is a close crop. And compare the heads side by side for feather definition... The white-eye is half the size of the swallow. World population barn swallow ~ 400,000,000; world population Mauritius white-eye ~ 10,000 Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:44, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:49, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 07:54, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:33, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:47, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:37, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 16:12, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:35, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:52, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 10 June 2023 (UTC) --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:28, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Zosteropidae (White-eyes)

File:Coast at northwestern Boa Vista, 2010 12.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2023 at 12:39:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Cabo Verde
Info created and uploaded by Ximonic - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 12:39, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:39, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The height of the photo is not very high, but this is a 2010 digital photo, and this composition, with its concentric curves, is beautiful and well photographed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:44, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Detail resolution is a bit low (look e.g. at the grass; ƒ/22 on a 7D = APS-C camera introduces too much diffraction), but as a whole the result is fine. --Aristeas (talk) 08:05, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:36, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:49, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:40, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:25, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:44, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support We need more FP's from Cape Verde! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:32, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, Arion! I haven't personally been to Cabo Verde myself, but I've joined various travel groups on various social media platforms; there are few CV photos, but the few are spectacular! --SHB2000 (talk) 07:20, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support per Aristeas, with some concerns about level of detail --LexKurochkin (talk) 08:26, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:50, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 10 June 2023 (UTC) --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:26, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Cabo Verde

File:Trier 500 Millionen Mark Fritz Quant.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2023 at 16:14:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Money & Seals
Info Created by Fritz Quant, issued by the city of Trier in 1923, reproduced from an original banknote, uploaded and nominated by Palauenc05.
Support -- Palauenc05 (talk) 16:14, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another beautiful Notgeld note in superb condition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:02, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 08:24, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --LexKurochkin (talk) 12:40, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:26, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:43, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yas. --Peulle (talk) 08:13, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:38, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:26, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:43, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 10 June 2023 (UTC) --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:24, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Money & Seals

File:Boxwood and beech relict forest canopy, Epiphytes, Mezmay, Russia.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2023 at 11:51:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Southern Federal District
Info Tree canopy from a very special, epiphyte-rich relic ancient forest in Western Caucasus. The mossed spurs of Buxus colchica on the right are very old, it’s quite possible they are over 600 years old. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 11:51, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Argenberg (talk) 11:51, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely! --SHB2000 (talk) 21:41, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:02, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:19, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow for me. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 22:28, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Harsh light. Nothing special in my view. And blurry on the sides -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Harsh light sounds odd here. A landscape or an object can be harsh lit under midday sun, but dense canopy which itself is diffusing, scattering, reflecting and dispersing the light, when photographed from the ground is bright at best. I would refer to tree canopies like this as 'bright and magical' but certainly not harsh lighted. Apart from the sunlight here is already subdued by scattered clouds. This place is special because not too many forest habitats are that old in the world. --Argenberg (talk) 13:27, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An ordinary tree does not become spectacular just because it's old, unfortunately. At least this picture does not reflect this peculiarity. Concerning the light, I maintain it's harsh, with strong contrasts. I've added notes to show were the blurry foreground is the most distracting. Too narrow depth of field. There is no visible sun rays like in File:Bruderwald-Herbst-026375.jpg for example. Not the best time of the day for shooting in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:48, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It’s a matter of taste. I find this scene spectacular with all the twists, curves, moss and old lichen. Old forests (over 300 years old) almost always do look spectacular to most people and you have to appreciate nature to find beauty in such scenes. You seem to have low tolerance for contrast. Harsh is usually associated with something undesirable like blown-out highlights or something, which is not the case here as the dynamical range is effectively preserved. The blurriness that you highlighted is natural in photography. Those are out-of-focus areas and I believe it does not have to be everything in focus in dense forest. You can play with out-of-focus areas and add them to the mix if it feels right. I don’t quite remember, but it is possible I intentionally placed those low-hanging branches in frame to grant it more depth and a spontaneous feel and to balance the composition. --Argenberg (talk) 12:54, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, so sorry to say that the more I look at your picture, the more the issues mentioned above embarrass me. So maybe it's not worth trying to convince me. I honestly think this image is not spectacular. Even though it is a great forest to walk through. I don't know, good for the planet, but photographically, no wow in my subjective view. Black shadows, wrong focus. Regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:36, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Of course you can have your point of view and your own subjective perception. I wasn’t trying to convince you actually. It was an attempt to describe what deems limiting to me. What I forgot to mention is that out-of-focus areas in frame can also add presence (in addition to perceived depth and spontaneity) to the scene to acquire more immersive and less stagy experience/appearance. It is commonly practiced in cinematography and photography. They can also be an artistic element in the composition on its own. By the way, the shadows on the left look pleasantly dark on my display, which is professionally calibrated, not black. Yes, someone may probably find the shadows dark, but if I were to lift them the image would then loose some natural dynamics and would become flat, I guess. Thanks for comments, anyway. --Argenberg (talk) 17:07, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, lifting the shadows wouldn't be a good idea. They are originally dark, not because my screen is badly calibrated, but because the photo was taken in the middle of the day, at 13:14. Harsh light = harsh contrasts = hard shadows -- Basile Morin (talk) 17:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per above -- PalauanLibertarian (talk) 02:04, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I can appreciate this photo and I don't think there is any question of hard light.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:00, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above. -- Karelj (talk) 16:45, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a wonderful image, per above. Sorry! -- Hamid Hassani (talk) 20:45, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Thank you for your constructive discussion. Blurred objects as distractors can add plasticity to a scene. In this case, in my personal opinion, the branch is at the limit of that. Despite the other drawbacks mentioned above, I still find the photo impressive enough. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:20, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blurred obstructing branch and just no wow for me --Lupe (talk) 09:16, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This low-angle view up trees to blue sky can, and has, made wonderful pictures. But it needs the trees grouping just the right way, and in this image they don't. Daniel Case (talk) 18:10, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose.Per Daniel --Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:46, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:57, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Μετεωρα by night.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2023 at 13:01:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Greece
Info created and uploaded by Argiriskaramouzas - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 13:01, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 13:01, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Settlement OOF. --SHB2000 (talk) 21:41, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Technically not perfect (a tiny little bit noisy), but decent, and this photo has the great advantage to show, finally, the famous Meteora site at a different time of day with a different mood. At daytime the village in the valley is rather boring, but at night and with the starburst effect it looks nice. It would indeed be a problem if the settlement was OOF, but (with all respect) I think it’s almost as sharp as it gets, the slight softness is IHMO due to haze. --Aristeas (talk) 08:10, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice framing, beautiful subject --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:48, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support MartinD (talk) 19:26, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:20, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:59, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:00, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank Daniel Case (talk) 18:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:05, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:45, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Breathtakingly beautiful. --Till (talk) 08:30, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 10 June 2023 (UTC) --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:04, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#Greece

File:Vida no Parque Nacional de Jericoacoara.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2023 at 01:17:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Equidae (Equids)
Info created and uploaded by Nortondefeis - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 01:17, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 01:17, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. It would be nice if the Portuguese file description included the details in the English description, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:59, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question Can the bottom left corner be cropped? --SHB2000 (talk) 10:01, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That would probably put the donkey too close to the edge of the frame, perhaps tidying up the grass is an alternative? [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julesvernex2 (talk • contribs)

That would, indeed. I'm going to have to

Oppose per Charles, though. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:16, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Nice composition, but sadly not the technical quality for FP. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:16, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 16:30, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Heart-warming and appealing photo. The technical quality is OK, it has just not been treated with AI sharpening etc. --Aristeas (talk) 08:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Aristeas. The AI-treated images we've seen around here so far are a mixed bag: some look nice (good sharpening on subject, clean background), others are overcooked (false details on subject, waxy-looking background, sloppy transitions). This image doesn't enjoy the benefits of the former, but it avoids the issues of the latter. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 09:25, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:15, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:35, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:15, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:29, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Charlesjsharp. -- Hamid Hassani (talk) 20:48, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Pro for the compo and Con for the technical quality Poco a poco (talk) 08:26, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Charlesjsharp. -- Karelj (talk) 12:29, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PalauanLibertarian (talk) 21:26, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:44, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:44, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:04, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Equidae (Equids)

Antigona lamellaris valves, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2023 at 12:56:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Antigona lamellaris (Lamellate Venus), right valve
Antigona lamellaris (Lamellate Venus), left valve

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Veneridae
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 12:56, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:56, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ⍨PLib^🗣️ 22:32, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 15:00, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:38, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:32, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:53, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 14:58, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:17, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the set. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:20, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:30, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:03, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:05, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 11 June 2023 (UTC) --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Shells#Family : Veneridae

File:34. Ulica - TNT Shows - Moving Poles - 20210904 1310 1879.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2023 at 07:44:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info TNT Shows in the show "Moving Poles" at the festival of street theatres in Krakow. All be me -- Jakubhal 07:44, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 07:44, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 07:54, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:43, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 21:44, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It is a nice composition with great expression - I don't suppose the bottom of the dress was there before you cropped the image was it? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:55, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The dress was actually much longer, covering almost the entire pole. For this shot, I zoomed in on the people, so the lower part of the pole is out of sight. This bottom crop is from the original. What is missing after cropping is more sky and buildings. -- Jakubhal 10:16, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks. May be more sky and building would work too. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:34, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --GRDN711 (talk) 14:54, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very lively.--Ermell (talk) 16:09, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:40, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:28, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 14:57, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:42, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:30, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:06, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:53, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 11 June 2023 (UTC) --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:34, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Events

File:Ascidia roja (Halocynthia papillosa), Cabo de Palos, España, 2022-07-17, DD 15.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2023 at 07:46:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Ascidiacea
Info Red sea squirt (Halocynthia papillosa), Cape Palos, Spain. This species of tunicate, also known as sea peach, occurs at depths of 2 to 100 metres (6.6 to 328.1 ft). It attaches itself to rocks and overhangs, or among Posidonia (seagrass). It can be found in the Northeast Atlantic, Western Pacific, along the Portuguese coast, and the Mediterranean Sea. Halocynthia papillosa is usually about 10 centimetres (3.9 in) high but can reach 20 centimetres (7.9 in). It can contract when disturbed. Note: there is no FPs of the whole order Pleurogona. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 07:46, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 07:46, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question How big is this specimen? The description says 10-20 metres but this looks tiny (granted there is nothing in the photo to really use as a guide for scale). BigDom (talk) 16:15, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BigDom: Good spotted, I corrected the data, it isn't meters but centimeters. I believe it was indeed about 10 cm (3.9 in) high. This is a macro shot. Poco a poco (talk) 18:03, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for fixing it. I'll Support. BigDom (talk) 14:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 12:33, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dull light and low level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:14, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thank you for your feedback and comments, I take it back. Poco a poco (talk) 12:32, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 12:32, 10 June 2023 (UTC) --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:30, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anthemis. Schubkamille. Locatie, Tuinen Mien Ruys.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2023 at 04:31:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
Info Anthemis. Chamomile. All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:31, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:31, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:15, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral nice, but the crop is quite tight and reso rather low for 2023. -- Ivar (talk) 12:21, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. Quite a low resolution indeed. I came across this photo while sorting and found the image striking for a shot from 2014! --Famberhorst (talk) 15:31, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:33, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice image but looks too much like a generic flower image to me so doesn't have wow for FP. Also resolution is pretty low. -- PalauanLibertarian (talk) 00:01, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The size of the photo may be small, but the level of detail (ergo resolution of the flower itself) is pretty high and nothing would be gained by including more around the flower. The composition is satisfying to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:49, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with PalauanLibertarian. Resolution too small., in my opinion. Only 3,3 Mpx, isn't it? While this camera offers six times more -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:20, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile. -- Karelj (talk) 16:48, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 04:17, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:43, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Palauenc05 (talk) 09:40, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cardinal (Argynnis pandora) female underside Dobruja.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2023 at 09:31:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info One FP of this species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:31, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:31, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KTC (talk) 09:54, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 10:26, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 11:37, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:15, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 12:23, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 14:57, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 16:03, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:29, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:25, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:30, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 07:59, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:56, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~--GeonwooLee (talk) 07:14, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not a valid vote (50 edits required). -- Ivar (talk) 10:18, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Nythar^T^.^C 10:04, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:30, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:05, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:54, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 15:25, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)

File:Chegem-001.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2023 at 12:20:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The tourist camp in the Kabardino-Balkaria Nature Reserve.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#North_Caucasian_Federal_District
Info created by Alexander Novikov - uploaded by Alexander Novikov - nominated by Alexander Novikov -- Alexander Novikov (talk) 12:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alexander Novikov (talk) 12:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose First the composition is a bit touristy. I can understand the idea of having a tent in the context that this is a tourist camp site. But this particular tent, with shoes & flip flops etc. showing doesn't work for me. And secondly, the image looks a bit over-processed? The leaves on the trees and the bottom of the mountains right behind it. A bit of a water colour painting feel to me. Great for water colour painting, not so much for a photo. -- KTC (talk) 23:51, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Tempered Support I still find the sky on the upper left a bit noisy, but I appreciate the image and composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:07, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:10, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:36, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I agree with KTC about the processing / lack of detail, but I'm mostly not convinced by the composition. I'd have probably taken the shot further to the right and place the tent more to the left. Right know my impression is that it's kind of off-centered. Poco a poco (talk) 08:16, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per KTC. -- Karelj (talk) 12:21, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per KTC and Poco. --GRDN711 (talk) 15:04, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reluctant oppose I love the composition and color, but per KTC those trees on the slope at right look unnatural. Daniel Case (talk) 04:22, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 15:26, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:ChryslerValiant-Gardey1.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2023 at 22:54:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chrysler Valiant, South America version, rear side.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles
Info created/uploaded/nominated by --Ezarateesteban 22:56, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ezarateesteban 22:54, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A nice enough image but it doesn't seem to have any "wow factor". There's nothing special that makes the image stand out. It's just a still image of a parked car. --Peulle (talk) 07:58, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice effect, but a lot of disturbing elements in the background. --XRay 💬 08:03, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good idea, but the car was not carefully enough selected or isolated. Also, there are left color fragments in the b&w area. The editing would have to be redone from scratch with a more appealing framing. This is just a constructive proposal. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 08:43, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment background now less distracting Ezarateesteban 23:13, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Much more distracting -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose This version with an artificially blurred background is worse than the previous one. Look at the wheels that seem to float in space. And the technical work was awkwardly handled all around. Through the glass the contrast makes no sense, this way -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I totally agree. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:01, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Bad idea, poorly executed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:28, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Unfortunately, the editing was not as successful as it was intended. -- Spurzem (talk) 12:48, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Sadly, I have to agree: this edit was unsuccessful and made the result much worse. Making the background blurry was anything but beneficial. My suggestion for improvement was, that you should have freed the car more carefully to make the b&w background stand out more convincingly, and not blur the background artificially. Unfortunately, I could not respond to your comment before because I was several days on the road. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 11:40, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 05:14, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madrid - Edificio Grassy (Gran Vía 1) - north facade - relief over entrance.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2023 at 23:53:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
Info All by Tomascastelazo -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 23:53, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 23:53, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice photo, but I don't think "somewhere in Madrid" is sufficient. What street is this? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:01, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poorly categorized. See Over-categorization. Also per COM:I "Images should have a meaningful file name" -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:30, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed by another user. But still oppose per Palauenc05 and BigDom, below: excessive angle that prevents me from appreciating the sculptor's artwork -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:41, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Lupe (talk) 16:03, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'll support if it gets a better name -- PalauanLibertarian (talk) 01:55, 5 June 2023 (UTC) struck out the earlier of the two votes by the same user. BigDom (talk) 06:09, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support -- ⍨PLib^🗣️ 11:42, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile – and where the hell is "somewhere in Madrid"? --SHB2000 (talk) 07:08, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment An interesting photo, but here we see the difference between Commons and, e.g., Flickr. ;–) On Flickr a title like Somewhere in Madrid would work well; on Flicker redundant and vague tags are the rule, not the exception. Here on Commons, however, people (including me) immediately ask “Where in Madrid? What building is this? What kind of architectural element? From what epoch?” etc. For learning by example I have tried to improve the categories a bit, but for a useful filename, description, and proper categorization we would need to know what exactly this photo shows … --Aristeas (talk) 09:20, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment And adding some tentative categories really helps. After browsing Architectural elements in Madrid and the best-matching subcategories for 3 minutes, I have already learnt that this photo shows the relief over the central entrance at the north façade of the Edificio Grassy, 1 Gran Vía, built 1916–1917. Here are more photos of that building; this photo shows the north façade and we can notice the entrance with the number 1; this photo shows exactly the same relief over that entrance. I do not report this here to boast — on the contrary, I’ve never been to Madrid, I’m sure other people would have figured it out even faster. I just want to show that we can use Commons itself to indentify such photos. Now if the photographer could please clarify the caption of his nice picture and add the categories (hint: you can copy the categories of this picture almost 1:1), I would also like to vote for this photo. --Aristeas (talk) 09:30, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So “somewhere in Madrid” is more or less exactly at 40.41916, -3.698052. Please add {{Object location|40.41916|-3.698052}}to the description of the photo. --Aristeas (talk) 09:35, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh … I have done it for you and also renamed both the photo and the nomination page to a descriptive name. Hope it helps. @Ikan Kekek, Basile Morin, PalauanLibertarian, and SHB2000: File has been renamed, description expanded, categories added. --Aristeas (talk) 07:34, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Too much distortion. Couldn't it be taken from a larger distance, wherever in Madrid it is? --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:07, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Off-centre crop and angle of view too severe. BigDom (talk) 16:11, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Taking a look at the map shows that it should have been possible to take a photo from a larger distance. But on the other hand the intentionally low angle and the black-and-white add an air of mystery to the portal, making this photo much more moving that most plain photos of that building. --Aristeas (talk) 07:34, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. I like the angle and think there's room for this as well as straighter-on shots that look more like File:Madrid - Edificio Grassy (Gran Vía 1) 07.jpg. Aristeas, thanks for taking care of things I think it would have been better for Tomascastelazo to attend to prior to nominating the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:32, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:28, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:40, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:42, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:06, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--BigDom (talk) 06:09, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs

File:Mars - August 30 2021 - Flickr - Kevin M. Gill.png, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2023 at 04:07:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Mars
Info created by Kevin Gill from Emirates Mars Mission data - uploaded by CactiStaccingCrane - nominated by CactiStaccingCrane. This picture is meant to be a replacement of Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:OSIRIS Mars true color.jpg. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 04:07, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 04:07, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Low res image. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:23, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too low resolution for an astronomy image to impress me.--Peulle (talk) 07:57, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others, but I was surprised not to find a more detailed picture of an entire face of Mars when I did FP and QI searches in Category:Mars (planet). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:17, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 05:13, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barn swallow in Montezuma (14460).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2023 at 01:21:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Hirundinidae_(Swallows)
Info Male barn swallow (Hirundo rustica) in the Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 01:21, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 01:21, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Some highlights are blown and the picture is perhaps slightly overexposed. What makes me support is the composition with an appealing smooth bokeh in the background -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:31, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:40, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Could you please add geocoordinates? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:44, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Done — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:50, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:26, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment ~~Portrait mode is better - low % of bird is on photo. + some contrast.~~ --Mile (talk) 12:34, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 13:17, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PetarM: I actually uploaded a portrait version first: here. I went back and forth about which I liked better -- curious what others think. Pinging other participants: @Basile Morin, SHB2000, Frank Schulenburg, Aristeas, and Palauenc05: . — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:50, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't ping but still have an opinion. I prefer the portrait version much better and would support it (I abstain here). By the way, is there anything you can do to improve the overexposed areas on the head? Poco a poco (talk) 08:20, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New version uploaded - A few supported the portrait shot, and nobody expressed a preference for landscape, so I went ahead and reinstated the crop. As for the head, no -- not without adding something that wasn't actually there, anyway. The sun was bright, but it landed briefly unusually close to me and on a stick that actually provided some separation from the reeds (and wasn't backlit by the empty sky), so I'm happy with it anyway. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:51, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support for the portrait version. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:13, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:31, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is anyone else seeing the artefacts on the neck feathers and the halo around the tail? Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:11, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That area is not as sharp as others but I wouldn't call that artefacts Poco a poco (talk) 08:20, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose You might be right that artefact (created by man) is the wrong word - a halo can either come from light distortion and be in the raw file or from processing - the halo on the tail looks like a processing flaw to me, but either is bad news. There are also over-exposed areas on the bird's head and the dead flowers. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:19, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Fine. --Mile (talk) 07:29, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:39, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:54, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Really love the photo and glad to see you got upstate but Charles has a point here. Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 05:14, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Hirundinidae_(Swallows)

File:Red-winged blackbird singing (94019).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2023 at 01:07:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Icteridae_(Icterids)
Info Red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus) singing in Toronto. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 01:07, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 01:07, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Open beak giving life to the subject and fine composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:28, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support What Basile said. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:40, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Like a diva singing an aria ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 08:26, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 10:42, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 12:40, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 13:17, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:40, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice composition but have a look at the halo around the leaves in front of the chest and the lack of definition on the feathers, especially the tail. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:14, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support It'd be an improvement if you address Charles's concerns, but still a FP to me Poco a poco (talk) 08:18, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:42, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Charlesjsharp. -- Karelj (talk) 13:38, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Charlesjsharp. -- PalauanLibertarian (talk) 21:21, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:01, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The halos around the leaves are a little distracting, but I like the action conveyed by the open beak, and the overall level of detail is good IMO. BigDom (talk) 14:16, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:39, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:54, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Qualified support per Poco. Daniel Case (talk) 03:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 05:15, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Icteridae_(Icterids)

File:El leon de la puerta de Alcala.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2023 at 00:06:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
Info All by Tomascastelazo -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:06, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:06, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Strong vignetting, weird angle and ordinary subject in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile. -- Karelj (talk) 16:50, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Doesn't quite work. --Peulle (talk) 08:12, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 10:09, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The vignetting is a matter of taste, IMHO it adds atmosphere to the photo. The lion head relief is done well and a good pars pro toto for the whole portal. Technical quality is good, but for such details I would welcome even better quality. --Aristeas (talk) 07:44, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would support a square crop with the head centered. Yann (talk) 11:51, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:55, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. Daniel Case (talk) 19:07, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 05:15, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:View of Robe coastline and Obelisk 20230214 1.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2023 at 12:26:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#South Australia
Info created and uploaded by DXR - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 12:26, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:26, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:15, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:29, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive scenery with nice golden light -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:45, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:02, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 07:38, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful and per Basile --LexKurochkin (talk) 08:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:11, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:20, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for the nomination! --DXR (talk) 12:08, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 16:58, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support High-quality. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:24, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:51, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:04, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:58, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 16:41, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:41, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 08:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:15, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Australia#South Australia

File:CH.ZG.Walchwil Walchwilerberg Heumoosegg 2016-10-30 OrigX-R gp.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2023 at 11:30:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Zug
Info created & uploaded by Roy Egloff - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 11:30, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 11:30, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support (The contrails are a little bit disturbing, but all in all IMO FP.) --XRay 💬 08:02, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:45, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Crepuscular rays on steroids ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 09:11, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Muscular trails asteroids :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:58, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Jakubhal 11:30, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 00:45, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quite fortunate the contrails following the directions of the sun rays -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:49, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:04, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:56, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:11, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Switzerland#Zug

File:2022-08-12 European Championships 2022 – Triathlon Elite Women by Sandro Halank–092.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2023 at 11:53:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Sandro Halank -- Sandro Halank (talk) 11:53, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sandro Halank (talk) 11:53, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 13:19, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose IMO the tightly cropped square restricts the impact of an action shot like this. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:57, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The narrow focus increases the impact to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:50, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I think that Rhododendrites has got a point. Resolution/detail is not high either. Poco a poco (talk) 08:07, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Probably 1/200s was not fast enough. Leg and arm are blurry. Also the background with beheaded spectators is too busy -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would imagine not going with a faster shutter speed was deliberate, being a panning shot to get the sense of motion rather than trying to freeze the action. -- KTC (talk) 20:52, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not very clear whether the blurry background is due to the camera motion or to the limited focus length (f/2.8). Probably both. But the upper crop is very tight -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:12, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The settings were a very intentional decision. The picture should show the dynamics of the situation, a longer exposure time would simply not have worked at this point. With a shorter time the argument would have come here again that the picture is static. And f/2.8 simply has the reason that the background should be as blurred as much as possible. The face and the upper body are sharp, the legs and the wheel show the dynamics of the situation. Everything intentionally chosen this way. Sandro Halank (talk) 09:50, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sport shots frozen in a short time appear "static" only when the action is unnoticeable. Cut off heads in the background and lack of lead room reduce the dynamism -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:07, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:53, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Very good, beautiful -- Spurzem (talk) 12:44, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Qualified support If some of the purple CA on the woman's shoulders, back and head could be cleaned up, that would be nice. Daniel Case (talk) 18:32, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Motion blur does not seem a good artistic choice here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:58, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:08, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:VY Rc6 1331 Katterjåkk.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2023 at 18:33:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler – nominated by Ivar (talk) 18:33, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 18:33, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:05, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:32, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great contrast of the light in the foreground and the dramatic stormy sky in the background, and I love that a rainbow was captured on the upper right. That's aside from everything else. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:30, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:39, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:29, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 05:47, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:10, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A minor issue. Please have a look to the wires (at the train). Are the really colored? ;-) --XRay 💬 08:01, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The usual false colours from Bayer filter demosaicing. It’s best to fix this during the raw image conversion (development). In ACR/Lightroom, painting a small mask over the wires with Defringe = 80 or so removes this very well. --Aristeas (talk) 09:01, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 08:18, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice catch --PierreSelim (talk) 08:34, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 09:01, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:18, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:53, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:03, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:00, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 22:47, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:40, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 13 June 2023 (UTC)--Palauenc05 (talk) 21:42, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

File:Milky way1.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2023 at 00:37:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Galaxies
Info created by NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCLA - uploaded by PalauanLibertarian - nominated by PalauanLibertarian -- ⍨PLib^🗣️ 00:37, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ⍨PLib^🗣️ 00:37, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:02, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful! --SHB2000 (talk) 07:18, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 08:12, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Our beautiful neighborhood. ;o) --Yann (talk) 08:15, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:48, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:49, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support -- stunning. Nythar^T^.^C 09:39, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fascinating and beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:40, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 11:28, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Trougnouf (talk) 12:32, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Yann -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:08, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:03, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:00, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 16:33, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 06:27, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 14 June 2023 (UTC)--Palauenc05 (talk) 07:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy#Galaxies

File:Waves of Luputhana 11.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2023 at 10:02:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Liquid
Info created & uploaded by Snowmanstudios - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:02, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:02, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 12:17, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:21, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:23, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question Do we have natural colours here? Is it oversaturated? Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:24, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The white balance is probably off -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:21, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Something not natural. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:58, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The spray looks quite yellow to me. --Milseburg (talk) 14:53, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yellow. It's about 35 minutes after sunrise given to the EXIF time and location. Can a golden hour sun do that? -- KTC (talk) 21:32, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's golden hour, but the colors are yellowish -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:21, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In general, I would not read too much into the EXIF time and location of photos. GPS locations are often quite inaccurate, if not corrected in post with the help of a good map, and camera clocks are often not exact – for example, I do not care much about the time setting of my cameras, so the EXIF time of my photos is often off by an hour or more :–). Therefore I would not conclude too much from 35 minutes … --Aristeas (talk) 08:00, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Dramatic, and at least to my naked eye, everything really is often yellowish close to dawn. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:48, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 07:54, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 08:02, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment thanks for the nomination @Tomer T and all your supporting votes --Snowmanstudios (talk) 12:14, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:35, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per other supporters. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:47, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I know the light of the golden hour, but here it is not. This yellow already has a hint of green. Sorry, not a FP for me because of unnatural colors. The scene is great. --Milseburg (talk) 13:39, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support fine with me. -- Ivar (talk) 17:41, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Charles and Milseburg. Even the sky is greenish. Overall aspect is like an old postcard -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:28, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The colors are way off. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:46, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree for colors, and main subject is that wave, which is too much in the edge. --Mile (talk) 06:42, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with opposite votes above -- Jakubhal 10:30, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support OK IMHO. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:34, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:08, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:51, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:30, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 14 June 2023 (UTC)--Palauenc05 (talk) 14:10, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Liquid

File:National Arboretum Canberra Pano.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2023 at 23:10:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Australia
Info created by David.moreno72 - uploaded by EEIM - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 23:10, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:10, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not sure whether I'm missing something, but what I'm seeing is that it's not very sharp, too noisy, and I'm not sure about the colors. Until I checked the EXIF, I thought this might be a cellphone pic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:43, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose SHB2000 do you check the photo before nomination. Its missing - left-up corner, + 2 other. Quality isnt for FP, neither QI. Tower leaning left as well. --Mile (talk) 08:14, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but I'm confused by "do you check the photo before nomination" – I do and I only nominate a photo if I think it's good enough for a nomination. I don't know if that's a statement or a question (reads like a question, but the lack of a question mark makes it a statement), but I guess that's all you needed from me. SHB2000 (talk) 08:18, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- SHB2000 open it again, just to cover the screen, see left top and bottom edge, and right side bottom edge. Next tower. --Mile (talk) 13:29, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The tower is not vertical. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:34, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination. Clearly won't get the support; won't bother continuing. SHB2000 (talk) 08:06, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 12:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Town hall of Mont-de-Marsan edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2023 at 12:32:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Town hall of Mont-de-Marsan at the blue hour (morning)
Town hall of Mont-de-Marsan at the late blue hour (morning)

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:32, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:32, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think the purpose of a set nomination is to include two images, seven minutes apart, for which you can't decide which one to nominate so just nominate both. I don't think either are exceptional. We have lots of pictures of nice buildings. The sunset one has a better sky but you underexposed it (compared to the other, 0.5 sec vs 3 sec) thus ending up a bit noisy compared to the first. I'm not over bothered about the noise but here it was preventable. Also f/11 is too small an aperture for a DX Nikon, and suggest you don't go below f/8. The picture isn't very sharp as a result. It's a fine QI but I'm not going wow for either, and all sunsets are pretty. -- Colin (talk) 16:16, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I disagree with Colin here. The noise may have been preventable, but it does not ruin the image overall. The building and the sunset together to give a charming impression, hence the wow factor. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The image on the right has the most wow-factor for me. I agree with Colin though that an aperture of f/8 might have been better to create a sharper image (I'm not a Nikon shooter and don't know the specific lens you used, so please feel free to disagree if I'm wrong). I also don't really see why you nominated a set. Overall, the wow-factor is sufficient for me to support this nomination. Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:01, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No reason for this to be a set nomination, sorry. I would support the photo on the right if it was nominated by itself. BigDom (talk) 06:18, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a set according to the rules; not even the identical PoV. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:00, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unsure about the set rules, but support for both photos. The detail level is decent, the atmosphere is great. (In general the tip to stop at ƒ/8 on DX = APS-C cameras is very good, just as ƒ/11 is in general the last sensible aperture on full-frame cameras. But as Frank has intimated this is also a question of the lens used: if the lens has a really strong field curvature, a smaller aperture can still yield better results.) --Aristeas (talk) 08:19, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. -- Karelj (talk) 10:33, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support preferably for the second photo, but still the first one offers enough WOW factor to support the set, imo. The used lens 18.0-55.0 mm ƒ/3.5-5.6 is part of the 3X00 series kit. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:40, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose just too similar to be a set. No prejudice against individual nomination(s). — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:25, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination, I will nominate just one photo. --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Town hall of Wielun (3).jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2023 at 12:36:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Poland
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:36, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:36, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not seeing anything exceptional here. Image suffers from a common problem with city photos that you can't stand far enough back and so perspective correction ends up making the tower look too large (and we get a better look at the tower from the other side). -- Colin (talk) 16:09, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. -- Karelj (talk) 10:30, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:00, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Doncella (Coris julis), Cabo de Palos, España, 2022-07-17, DD 69.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2023 at 12:44:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Labridae_(Wrasses)
Info Male Mediterranean rainbow wrasse (Coris julis) of a length of approx 20 cm (7.9 in), Cape Palos, Spain. This colourful fish can be found in the Mediterranean Sea and in the northeast Atlantic Ocean from Sweden to Senegal (with differences inn colour and genetics between Mediterranean and Atlantic populations). Like many wrasses, C. julis is a sequential hermaphrodite: all start in the smaller initial phase. These initial-phase individuals (both females and males) can turn into the larger secondary-phase males. At a length of about 18 cm (7.1 in), all individuals are secondary-phase males (and can reach a maximum length of 25 cm (9.8 in)). It feeds on amphipods, isopods, sea urchins, polychaete, shrimps, and small gastropods. Note: there is no FP of the genus Coris. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 12:44, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:44, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:02, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:39, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 15:23, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 10:30, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support OK, so we have a fish. 20 upper 09:00, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:04, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:00, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Labridae_(Wrasses)

File:Cotton harvest in Xinjiang.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2023 at 08:45:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#China
Info Cotton harvest in Xinjiang, China (aerial photograph). Created and uploaded by Azonesa, nominated by --Aristeas (talk) 08:45, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Two things make this vertical view special for me. One thing is the surprise: At the first glance this photo looks almost abstract – the high contrast, the limited colours and the row structure give it a strong graphical effect, it looks like a diagram or a flag. Only then I realize that it shows a cotton field with hundreds of cotton plants and two cotton pickers at work. The other thing is that we can really see the progress of the harvest in the photo – the harvested part of the field is almost desolate because the bright white balls of cotton have been picked … One could say that the contrast is too hight etc., but comparing other photos I think it’s just realistic. --Aristeas (talk) 08:45, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support While there are definitely artistic elements to this image, if you have ever picked cotton by hand, you will appreciate machine harvesting. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:28, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:58, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:48, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:22, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. However, is it just me, or do the shadows on the cotton balls look blue? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ikan Kekek (talk • contribs)
Support Very nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:50, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:35, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:03, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 06:31, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 10:30, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:23, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another great find from WLF, thanks for nominating! --Kritzolina (talk) 18:55, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Awesome! Agree with Ikan Kekek though, it seems a tad blueish, even for a midday photo --Julesvernex2 (talk) 14:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks almost like a flag. Daniel Case (talk) 02:17, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful cottons. 20 upper 09:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 18:51, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:00, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Agriculture#China

File:Ike & Tina Turner, Bestanddeelnr 924-2170 - Restoration.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2023 at 18:29:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Mixed
Info created by Rob Mieremet for Anefo - restored uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:29, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:29, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support We lack good pictures from this period. Yann (talk) 18:43, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm not sure you were right to darken the photo that much. Based on how other pictures of them look, I'd think somewhere in the middle between the original and this restoration would be likely to be about right. On the other hand, the background looks better darker. I'd welcome your thoughts. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:18, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Look at colour photos of her: She's not particularly light-skinned, and we don't want to make it look like she's lighter skinned than she is. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:33, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did look at color photos of both of them, as I said. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:33, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, If you desaturate, say, File:Tina_Turner_50th_Anniversary_Tour.jpg, she does come out substantially darker grey, if anything. File:President_George_W._Bush_congratulates_Tina_Turner_at_the_Kennedy_Center_Honors.jpg comes out similar. Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:49, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support I'll defer to you, recognizing that it's a judgment call. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:00, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Aristeas (talk) 14:07, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 16:31, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:59, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Iconic! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 00:08, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:24, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 06:30, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:47, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good, very good. 20 upper 09:06, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:01, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Mixed

File:Hairy dragonfly (Brachytron pratense) male Burren.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2023 at 20:15:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family : Aeshnidae (Hawker Dragonflies)
Info One close-up FP. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:15, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:15, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:34, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding, and might be the sharpest dragonfly picture I've seen at this degree of resolution. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:45, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 03:43, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 14:41, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 06:31, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:43, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 16:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice focus stack (I bet getting the translucent wings looking good wasn't easy) and sensible sharpening. I think there's a small focus stacking error on the top of the right wrong though, left a note. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 13:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Sorted. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:12, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support This image speaks volumes, so yes. 20 upper 08:59, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:10, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:59, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family : Aeshnidae (Hawker Dragonflies)

File:Garlic bulbs and cloves.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2023 at 17:29:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 17:29, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:29, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Beautiful execution but I find the reflections either side of the cloves distracting. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:12, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:38, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support There's one random piece of dirt on the lower right that you should clone out. Otherwise, I feel like this series is like a modern iteration of the great scientific/documentary illustrations of yesteryear. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:42, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done, dust piece is gone. -- Ivar (talk) 12:12, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Position is made bad and they are too close. Glass doesnt help here - difraction seem like some mistake. --Mile (talk) 06:40, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:39, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 11:38, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile.--Ermell (talk) 16:06, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:39, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:55, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:00, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:30, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile Morin. Excellent image. -- Nythar^T^.^C 10:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:05, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:54, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Would look nice in a montage on a cookbook cover. Daniel Case (talk) 18:33, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Good luck! 20 upper 09:15, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:02, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)

File:Bloemknoppen in ontwikkeling van Scharnierplant. 04-09-2022. (d.j.b) 01.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2023 at 05:06:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Lamiaceae
Info Flower buds in development of Physostegia virginiana Focus stack of 46 photos. (Note: The flower buds of Physostegia are attached symmetrically to the flower stem and can hinge).
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:06, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:06, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:23, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose stacking errors and I'm not keen on the background. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:06, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Works for me. And the plant is beautiful and very realistically depicted. --Aristeas (talk) 14:56, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seems deserving, as the plant is well depicted, and I'm not seeing stacking errors. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:13, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Look around the edges of the flowers - all blurry. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:09, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't see it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:41, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to zoom in and it is very obvious. The green leaf adjacent to the left edge of the big bud is blurred and should be retouched after stacking. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:21, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I can see it, but it's pretty marginal to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:26, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:43, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:31, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:49, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:52, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:31, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:02, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Lamiaceae

File:Parque Nacional de Jericoacoara Felipe Alves (02).jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2023 at 00:36:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Brazil
Info created and uploaded by Ralves.felipe - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 00:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 00:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm not in love with the excessive vignetting, but I do quite like the symbolism of this image. I guess you can take this as a Neutral vote. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:10, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is sunset, but still too dark. Vignetting. Also tilted (fixable) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:56, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not ready to be a Featured image. 20 upper 08:57, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Most of us agree, but that's not really an oppose reason. Not ready because? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:01, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Basile. Daniel Case (talk) 20:12, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:40, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:TheCheethcat.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2023 at 08:14:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) is a large cat native to Africa and Southwest Asia

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
Info The cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) is a large cat native to Africa and Southwest Asia (today restricted to central Iran). It is the fastest land animal, capable of running at 80 to 98 km/h (50 to 61 mph), as such has evolved specialized adaptations for speed, including a light build, long thin legs and a long tail. It typically reaches 67–94 cm (26–37 in) at the shoulder, and the head-and-body length is between 1.1 and 1.5 m (3 ft 7 in and 4 ft 11 in). Adults weigh between 21 and 72 kg (46 and 159 lb). Its head is small and rounded, with a short snout and black tear-like facial streaks. The coat is typically tawny to creamy white or pale buff and is mostly covered with evenly spaced, solid black spots. Four subspecies are recognised. -- 20 upper 08:14, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 20 upper 08:14, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose <1MP, poor crop. Potential FPX candidate, IMO. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:19, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SHB2000: What exactly is FPX? And why is the crop poor, is it the hind leg of the other cheetah? The crop seems spot-on to me. Maybe I made the wrong image choice; after all, this is my first FPC. 20 upper 12:14, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The crop is poor because we see only a bit of another cheetah. It's distracting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:01, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose As per SHB2000-Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 11:40, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Could you please add the creator and uploader to the information? --Kritzolina (talk) 15:51, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Too small. Please read the quidelines. Yann (talk) 19:27, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Sentinel-2 bahamas (cropped).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2023 at 18:00:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Satellite_images#North_America
Info created by Sentinel-2 - uploaded by PalauanLibertarian - nominated by PalauanLibertarian -- ⍨PLib^🗣️ 18:00, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ⍨PLib^🗣️ 18:00, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Tempted support I am not sure how well this works as a satellite image; but I understand that the crop has been made for aesthetical purposes, and indeed the result looks like an impressive enigmatic artwork. Imaging this image as a large print on a wall … It’s fascinating and frightening at the same time. --Aristeas (talk) 09:16, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's "tempered"

("tempted support" ... that would be interesting!) Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:22, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:04, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Real awesome. 20 upper 09:12, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:30, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:23, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:00, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Satellite_images#North_America

File:A couple of face-painted humans happily gazing into each other's eyes - crop 2 (DSC03824).jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2023 at 20:45:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Standing_people
Info Created and nominated by Trougnouf (talk) 20:45, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Trougnouf (talk) 20:45, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This version in full length is better in my view, if possible with a portrait format, cutting the tree at the right, and symmetrically balanced with the same space at the left. However the branch will be a bit distracting -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:27, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I agree that the branch on the right of the larger image is distracting, which is why I made this crop. I've tried to inpaint it but I think there are too many details to get satisfying results. (Still trying with fancier models but it's taking 5 hours to run and I don't have too much hope that it will work well.) I don't know why I prefer the legs cropped when zooming in that much, I believe that she prefers it too, and in my opinion it's better to have more space on the left because she is looking towards the left and her eye is the only one we can clearly see. What do you think? --Trougnouf (talk) 10:21, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The other version evokes a kind of Cupid & Psyche romantic painting, while this one seems awkwardly cropped to me, as if the camera was too close -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:47, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Turns out that stable diffusion is really good at inpainting and worth the 5-hours runtime... I've uploaded the least cropped version in case you or anyone would like to give it a shot, and I propose this crop as the new submission. --Trougnouf (talk) 17:03, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support I'm dissenting from others' views: I think this is a better composition and feels more intimate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:55, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative (inpainted tree; larger crop with no cutoff) edit

Info Alternative crop with inpainted tree per Basile Morin's suggestion. --Trougnouf (talk) 17:03, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Trougnouf (talk) 17:03, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Please add a {{Retouched}} template. --Yann (talk) 18:08, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thank you. --Trougnouf (talk) 19:37, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Too much editing of original. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:07, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Beautiful, evoking mythological reminiscences, as Basile rightly stated, and certainly something fresh. I have no problem with the retouching as long as it’s declared and serves a honourable purpose. --Aristeas (talk) 20:24, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How do you mean -honourable purpose? The picture was poorly composed; it could easily have been taken a few meters away. Should we allow that much cloning? It is a difficult area, but we run the risk of making the original composition irrelevant. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:48, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually if you look a few meters away in the uncropped version you will notice that it was in the shadows and that this spot was pretty ideal (minus a hanging dead tree). Besides, even though we spent some time in front of the tripod, we were moving and not focusing on it when the picture was taken and the emotions we felt at that moment is what I think is FP worthy. I also think that this composition works very well. Trougnouf (talk) 20:58, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removing a background element to make an image look better for aesthetical purposes is honourable; manipulating an image in order to back up fake news (e.g. that an elephant has climbed the Eiffel tower, that Jesus Christ blessed Putin or that Biden did steal the last presidential election from Trump) is not honourable. --Aristeas (talk) 09:07, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support for the alternative version. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:28, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:29, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the alternative, I think it's much better. This staging evokes me a modern representation of artworks like Flora and Zephyr or Faun and Bacchante -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:33, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:15, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment In both versions, a fern is growing out of his head. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:44, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
She put it there :) Trougnouf (talk) 18:47, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that's really in his hair? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:25, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, here is a cropped picture when she installed it: File:A woman inserting fern into a man's hair (DSC03724).jpg. (Before that she was holding / wearing it.) Trougnouf (talk) 07:41, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:08, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Busy background and photographically not up to the standards of feature pictures here. Sorry, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:29, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:56, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The scene looks somewhat strange to me. What about that piece of cloth? Is it a piece of clothing, or just meant to cover certain parts? --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:00, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is a piece of clothing used to cover certain parts which she is not comfortable sharing publicly. Trougnouf (talk) 22:14, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly what it looks like, which makes the composition unnatural. Which loving couple puts some cloth around the woman's waist, while the man is properly naked? Therefore I've decided to oppose --Palauenc05 (talk) 02:50, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's her decision not the couple's. She wanted some publishable pictures where no one's genitalia are visible, so she used it in some pictures and not others, I had it on in some pictures as well, we used each other too, and we have a lot of pictures which will be censored or not shared at all. I would like her to be even more comfortable with public nudity and I would especially like for society to accept it. I am happy that she is already this open. You are entitled to your clothing preferences but concluding whether two people make a loving couple based on one's clothing choices is silly. Trougnouf (talk) 05:32, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My statement was that the scene is made up, far away from a natural situation. Thank you for calling me "silly" for that. I won't continue to discuss on that basis anymore. --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:50, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strange pieces of fabric have been a part of art for quite some time now. Just saying. --Cart (talk) 20:38, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I have been hesitant to oppose, but after thinking it through, the compostion doesn't work for me. The background is too busy, the pose too artificial and there are too many distracting elements like the facepaint, the cloth, the fern .. --Kritzolina (talk) 19:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Kritzolina: it results too much artificial also for me. --Harlock81 (talk) 22:07, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question What the hack is this? 20 upper 09:14, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The details make it hard to see this is as a homage to a historical artwork, and as a modern portrait I think I'd have to agree with Kritzolina, sorry. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:30, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose she is exposed too much imho, and I don't see the wow here --Stepro (talk) 18:47, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment At first, I thought that was an objection to how much skin is showing, but I realize that you are referring to overexposure in terms of light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:41, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose JukoFF (talk) 19:21, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 07:09, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Great Sphinx (أبو الهول).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2023 at 09:54:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Egypt
Info Great Sphinx (أبو الهول). My photo. -- Mile (talk) 09:54, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info Wanted to gave it in Adobe RGB (instead of sRGB), but when i tried in EXIF was stated as "Uncalibrated". Adobe RGB is more rich with colors. Saturation or vibrance was not added on Sfinga.
Support -- Mile (talk) 09:54, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is a more compelling image than the other one with the Great Pyramid in the background. Nice camels. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:47, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:00, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Charles. --Milseburg (talk) 13:30, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 15:21, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 17:03, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:32, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:08, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Even though it does not look properly categorized, support. RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:23, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Yes, seems overcat and incorrectly categorized, but awesome. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:47, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --BigDom (talk) 06:24, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Cat "2021" is auto added when i gave to Wiki loves Earth. I see all images from this year go there. --Mile (talk) 08:58, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question What about Category:Natural heritage sites in Egypt with known IDs and Category:Protected areas of Egypt? Aren't those COM:OVERCAT? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:35, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The first of those seems to be added by {{EgyptNaturalHeritageSite}}. I agree about the second being unnecessary. BigDom (talk) 20:50, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever it's added by, it's clearly a catchall category that would obviously include the Sphinx. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:59, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Something is not OK there with Cats, but i will lave that to them. --Mile (talk) 18:00, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question Who is "them" on a wiki? I think "them" is "us." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Egyptians, they are creating Cats for WLE. --Mile (talk) 05:43, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 10:29, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gorgeous striking composition - Benh (talk) 11:08, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 13:47, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:28, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nythar^T^.^C 03:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 05:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful architecture. 20 upper 08:52, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:13, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maresa63 (talk) 13:43, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:06, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:22, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 04:54, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 28 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 17 June 2023 (UTC) --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:18, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Egypt

File:Sainik Manch Tudikhel, Kathmandu-6386.jpg edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2023 at 10:38:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors
Info Tundikhel's history goes back to at least the early 18th century during the Malla period. It serves multiple purposes as a military parade ground, horse race track, spot for religious festivals, rock concert venue, public park and cattle grazing ground. created by Bijay Chaurasia - uploaded by Bijay Chaurasia - nominated by Bijay Chaurasia -- Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 10:38, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 10:38, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Ordinary light and unspectacular architecture. Sorry, no wow -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:23, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. I would have supported if you actually went up close and took a symmetrical shot. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:12, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. -- Karelj (talk) 10:35, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not exceptional and poor quality. 20 upper 08:49, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nothing special for me --Stepro (talk) 18:38, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: it has received no support other than the nominator's in four days and is thus unlikely to succeed. Daniel Case (talk) 03:37, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:SWARMANOID-II.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2023 at 05:35:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aerial photograph of skiers in St. Moritz, Switzerland.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual snow sports
Info created by User:Stephlonfils - uploaded by User:Stephlonfils - nominated by Till.niermann -- Till (talk) 05:35, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Till (talk) 05:35, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment User:Stephlonfils, your name is Antoine Rose? This is quite a good photo. I can't tell - are the skiers all different individuals, or were any of them Photoshopped? Even if they were, it's still a great composition, but it would be interesting to know. There's one thing that seems problematic to me: the shadows all look purplish to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:57, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: , it seems that Stéphanie LONFILS is a different person, but working with or for the artist. -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:39, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I see. Thanks for explaining. I wish the artist would answer my questions, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:56, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:57, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very impressive. I really hope the legal aspects can be clarified, it would be wonderful to keep this as well as the other photos by Antoine Rose on Commons, they are excellent examples of creative photography. --Aristeas (talk) 18:56, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 22:45, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support. This is awesome. I could not believe it was a photo at first sight, given the elongated shapes of the shadows. The composition is breathtaking. There's a short Vimeo on this work -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:39, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very creative; let's hope it's an authorized upload. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:12, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've emailed the artist directly in the hope of clearing up the licensing issue. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:07, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Me too :-) Till (talk) 14:39, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A big Thank you to both of you! Sometimes two is better than one ;–), and it is really important in this case. --Aristeas (talk) 15:58, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds like it was uploaded with the consent of the photographer, but it does not sound to me like the terms of CC BY-SA are going to be compatible with his intentions (i.e. we don't allow NC). Email thread is ongoing. This nomination should just proceed, and if it's deleted so be it. At minimum, it was not uploaded by someone with no connection to the artist. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:40, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:40, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support assuming licence issue can be resolved. Very imaginative use of aerial perspective - looks even better zoomed in. --GRDN711 (talk) 11:51, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per GRDN711 --Kritzolina (talk) 18:58, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per GRDN711 --LexKurochkin (talk) 15:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral since the image does not have a licensing tag and will be deleted in a couple of days without one. Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not quality enough. 20 upper 09:04, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Sorry about the way this ended. I should have noticed (and resolved) the license issue before nominating this image. Many thanks to everyone who voted anyway. --Till (talk) 06:49, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Till.niermann: Thank you! It’s really a pity. – Could you please add {{Withdraw}} to this nomination? That would be the usual way to end it. Else we could get the funny situation that the photo is promoted to FP status after being deleted ;–). Best, --Aristeas (talk) 08:54, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --Till (talk) 11:38, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: X support, X oppose, X neutral → not featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 13:38, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pylon 1402-0112.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2023 at 11:08:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Germany
Info created and uploaded by Mozzihh, nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 11:08, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not sure this one quite work for me. In any case, I assume the central column the stairs is going around is straight vertical in real life. I would want such an image to be symmetrical with the column straight along the centre of the image. -- KTC (talk) 16:42, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Great subject, but the halos around the top of the structure and the overall asymmetry are too distracting, sorry. BigDom (talk) 20:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special, really. 20 upper 09:09, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:23, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 13:49, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:0519 -France - Nice - Corner Rue de l'Abbaye and Rue Saint Vincent - looking up - HDR - VP.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2023 at 11:13:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Others
Info created and uploaded by Virtual-Pano, nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 11:13, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual but okay. -- KTC (talk) 16:39, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Just slightly noisy but a really nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:32, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:25, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:58, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:01, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Somehow I wish it was perfectly symmetrical, but it is also very impressive this way, and maybe even more interesting. --Aristeas (talk) 08:49, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:01, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice -- Jakubhal 14:46, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 22:46, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 00:40, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:01, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:41, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Too much sharpening for my taste but anyhow, great shot, FP to me Poco a poco (talk) 21:40, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 10:31, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This works better when centered, and we're far from that here. - Benh (talk) 11:09, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:43, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love the X. 20 upper 09:07, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I've been coming back to this one for a couple of days hoping I might change my mind, but every time I see the X, I just wish it was more symmetrical. Nice idea though for sure. BigDom (talk) 09:36, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:22, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment first of all thanks to @Yann for the nomination and sorry for the delayed report. The symmetry some (including me) are craving for, can not be achieved here as neither the width of the streets are equal nor are the houses / roofs of identical shape and of uniform height. I tried this on several corners in Nice's old twon but the result has always been a assymmetrical X. The only modification done to the raw file is cropping and a slight tone mapping to brighten the shadows. --Virtual-Pano (talk) 22:52, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 13:51, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Others

File:Sunset, Kuta, Bali, Indonesia, 20220825 1755 0879.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2023 at 05:45:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Natural_phenomena#Sun
Info Sunset on the beach in Kuta, Bali. All by me. -- Jakubhal 05:45, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is my second nomination on this subject. First, I have withdrawn. -- Jakubhal 05:45, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Jakubhal 05:45, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this better than the other one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:38, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely Bali sunset! --SHB2000 (talk) 07:18, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 08:00, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 08:21, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The boats, arranged almost symmetrically, make it special. --Aristeas (talk) 08:48, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:55, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:02, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:00, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wet-blanket oppose It's hard to see the boats, and the sunset, while nicely photographed, does not really stand out from our many, many other pictures of sunsets. Daniel Case (talk) 06:14, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Hoping for a better sunset. 20 upper 09:11, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 13:48, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural_phenomena#Sun

File:Samania Gate, Patiala 03.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2023 at 12:38:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info created by - uploaded by - nominated by Satdeep Gill -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 12:38, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 12:38, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose There's something off-putting about the slant, though I realise it's out of your control. A pity because it's a nice image otherwise. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:36, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose Image is very off. 20 upper 08:30, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 14:24, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Espirógrafo (Sabella discifera), Cabo de Palos, España, 2022-07-16, DD 48.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2023 at 12:38:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Polychaeta
Info Ca. 5 centimetres (2.0 in) small slender peacock worm (Sabella discifera), Cape Palos, Spain. It's not a flower, plant or a coral but a segmented marine polychaete worm of the family Sabellidae that lives in a tube into which it can retract. S. discifera is a filter feeder and extends its radioles to catch phytoplankton and detritus. If you approach to them they retract instantly. The tube where the worm lives is calcareous and is attached to a rock, boulder or other hard surface and has a length of up to 5.2 centimetres (2.0 in). The tube is built by the worm using calcium stored in two white sacs on the ventral side of the second segment, or peristomium. The tube is fabricated by the glandular ventral shields on the other thoracic segments, where calcium is mixed with an organic secretion to make a paste. This is formed into shape by a collar found just behind the first segment, the prostomium. The anterior part of the worm protrudes from the tube and has a plume of about 40 feather-like radioles projecting from the peristomium, which also houses the two eyes and the mouth. A funnel-shaped lid or operculum covers the entrance to the tube when the animal retracts inside. Note: we have no FPs of this species. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 12:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support So strange living creatures out there... Yann (talk) 18:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, so beautiful. 20 upper 08:16, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fascinating. BigDom (talk) 09:33, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Yann. (But nothing is stranger than human being, as Sophocles already stated – Antigone 332–333 – even without knowing that human beings would be going to destroy the world they are living in. Sorry for the gloss, I could not resist ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 17:57, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support +1 -- Radomianin (talk) 18:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:55, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:29, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class_:_Polychaeta

File:Foggy Fanal forest in Seixal, Porto Moniz, Madeira, 2023 May.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2023 at 10:27:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info created & uploaded by Ximonic - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks for nominating this "Freischütz - Jungle DLC". This was quite unexpected nomination as a small fast glimpse into misty Fanal which offered constantly changing scenes with passing clouds and humidity - feeling sometimes difficult to capture the experience of walking in this strange 3D environment. --Ximonic (talk) 16:44, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Great mood and composition, good technical quality. Thanks for the nomination, Tomer T. Funny that today while sorting the recently promoted QIs, I thought of nominating this capture on FPC :) -- Radomianin (talk) 10:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I was going to nominate this for FP, but you beat me to it. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:43, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:47, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very atmospheric! Somehow reminds me of the stage set for an opera scene … (the Freischütz transferred to Madeira? ;–) --Aristeas (talk) 15:02, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas --LexKurochkin (talk) 15:17, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas... or a horror movie set. Yann (talk) 18:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 20:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:23, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:18, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The resolution is a bit small but otherwise a great capture.--Peulle (talk) 06:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:18, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Giving me Jungle Book vibes. 20 upper 08:21, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Clément Bardot (talk) 11:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 12:01, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- this picture strongly reminds me of one particular fictional place. Nythar^T^.^C 13:49, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great. —Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:47, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow --RodRabelo7 (talk) 06:12, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 13:18, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 04:49, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:42, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:15, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:55, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 10:47, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 29 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:24, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Portugal

File:CH.BE.Lenk-im-Simmental 2022-06-30 Siebenbrunnen-Falls 8900 16x9-R 8K.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2023 at 10:24:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Bern
Info created & uploaded by Roy Egloff - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful composition to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:25, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 06:44, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Too beautiful. 20 upper 08:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 12:03, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done, with a well-chosen exposure time (I am a bit tired of the over-smooth waterfall photos caused by very long exposure ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 17:47, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support wonderful captured --Stepro (talk) 18:34, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:45, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 18:46, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:54, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:18, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:42, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:15, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:55, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 10:47, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:22, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Switzerland#Bern

File:Nogueira valley view from Balcões, São Roque do Faial, Santana, Madeira, 2023 May.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2023 at 12:57:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info created and uploaded by Ximonic - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ximonic's photos never fail to impress me. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank you for support and for something quite different from the older stuff. :) --Ximonic (talk) 16:46, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Beautiful, much better than the photos of all the postcards I got from Madeira ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 15:00, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 15:18, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:23, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:47, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful picture, and very lush. Reminds me of the jungles that used to be in the interior of Malaysia before they clearcut them. :( -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:22, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:17, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, yes and yes. 20 upper 08:19, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:28, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. BigDom (talk) 09:38, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Clément Bardot (talk) 11:42, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 12:00, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:23, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 04:48, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:43, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:14, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 10:47, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:27, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Portugal

File:Kagu 0A2A3521.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2023 at 08:18:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Rhynochetos_(Kagus)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 08:18, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 08:18, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rare endangered endemic bird. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect --LexKurochkin (talk) 10:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A New Caledonian beauty! --SHB2000 (talk) 10:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 12:48, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 14:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 21:15, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:26, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The world needs to see this beautiful bird. 20 upper 08:24, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Stepro (talk) 18:34, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 04:50, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:41, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:55, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:20, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family_:_Rhynochetos_(Kagus)

File:Thomas Mundy Peterson by William R. Tobias.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2023 at 01:38:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by William R. Tobias - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:38, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:38, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support What an important person! And more's the shame that I'd never heard of him. Excellent photo and well restored. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:01, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:57, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:32, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:00, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 08:05, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. Just wondering, what's the rationale for including the mount, rather than just having the photograph itself? BigDom (talk) 08:29, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@BigDom: It's a souvenier of the event that presented the medal, so it's a meaningful object. There is a cropped version (with some work on fixing up the edges) in the other versions for uses that are better without. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:07, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 10:29, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 11:43, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:24, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not seeing anything exceptional here. 20 upper 08:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:10, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:32, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:14, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Men

File:Dingy skipper (Erynnis tages baynesi) male Burren.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2023 at 21:03:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Hesperiidae (Skippers)
Info There are 19 FPs of Hesperiidae (skipper butterflies): all are Hesperiinae. This is a spread-winged skipper (Pyrginae); this subspecies can only be found in the Burren, County Clare, Ireland. Many thanks to Jesmond Harding, author of The Irish Butterfly Book, for a precise grid reference. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:03, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:04, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:39, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 20:48, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good enough -- 20 upper 08:46, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Clément Bardot (talk) 11:44, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:34, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC) --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:28, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moth Tongue and Eye.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2023 at 09:50:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
Info all by-- fedaro (talk) 09:50, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- fedaro (talk) 09:50, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question What species of moth are we looking at here, and is it upside-down? BigDom (talk) 06:33, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not if the moth posed for the photo. The species? on Wikipedia you can see that it is a heterocera. fedaro (talk) 22:17, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Heterocera" is not a species, it's a paraphyletic grouping of over 100,000 species. BigDom (talk) 16:14, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The eye is great but the white 'halos' are very distracting. The orientation is strange. Perhaps it is dead? I guess it is stacked? What species is it? Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:52, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not if the moth posed for the photo. The species? on Wikipedia you can see that it is a heterocera. fedaro (talk) 22:17, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Unhelpful response. The image is uncategorized on Commons. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:01, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Please add more categories. --Yann (talk) 18:32, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality but not exceptional. 20 upper 08:48, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

20 upper, that reads like an oppose reason. Did you mean to support? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: It's all in the head; it depends on how you interpret the logic, albeit I did intend to support rather than to oppose. Although the image doesn't seem very remarkable to me, its quality overcomes that. 20 upper 06:19, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's clearer, thanks. The way you phrased it suggested an opposing vote, because featured pictures are supposed to be exceptional in some way. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:20, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Currently uncategorized. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:39, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:22, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Technically well done, but confusing and busy ... without the filename I'd have no idea what this was and what I was supposed to be looking at. Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I would, but the fact remains that "Moths" is not a very informative category. What species of moth is it, as asked above? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:58, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose At the very least, this is insufficiently described and categorized to be an FP. Part of what makes photos FPs is that they are educational. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:58, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Euthrix potatoria caterpillar, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2023 at 05:54:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Side view
Dorsal view

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Lasiocampidae_(Eggars,_lappets)
Info all by -- Ivar (talk) 05:54, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 05:54, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:11, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not my favorite creatures but OK. 20 upper 07:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. --Aristeas (talk) 07:12, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Detailed! --SHB2000 (talk) 11:20, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 13:50, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:30, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:02, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 04:29, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:24, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question Where are the lot of white spots all over the body - some are sharp, others unsharp - coming from? --Llez (talk) 13:53, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Llez please annotate. The body has yellow spots, white small spots are pollen. -- Ivar (talk) 18:29, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:54, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the set. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 19:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:24, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:11, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:35, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:39, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Lasiocampidae_(Eggars,_lappets)

File:Eucomis kuiflelie. 07-06-2023. (d.j.b).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2023 at 04:34:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family : Asparagaceae
Info Detail of a Eucomis (crested lily). The crest develops from the beautiful mottled stem. Focus stack of 16 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:34, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:34, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:51, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:35, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:19, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:23, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes. 20 upper 19:28, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:51, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:18, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 19:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:03, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:46, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 07:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales#Family : Asparagaceae

File:Filarmonica de MG 097.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2023 at 01:31:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events or Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Brazil
Info created by Gladstone Campos - uploaded by Filarmonicamg - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 01:31, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 01:31, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:27, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great lighting, and the uncorrected perspective distortion gives it a sense of scale --Julesvernex2 (talk) 14:01, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Julesvernex2. --Aristeas (talk) 14:33, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 16:35, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:57, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No, the image is not Featured material. 20 upper 08:41, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question By any chance, is it possible to make this image more centred? --SHB2000 (talk) 11:38, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:22, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment As an orchestral musician, I'm not bowled over by this, though it's a good photo and a potential VI. However, the cello soloist really should be identified in the file description. My opinion is that this kind of photo would be more impressive if the audience weren't quite so much in the dark, and there is sometimes a bit more house lighting, depending on the hall, though the audience being in the dark during the performance is the rule for the last century or so. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I'm going to oppose, because although the photo might be good enough, on the same basis that we don't promote photos that don't state what genus of animal we're viewing, I think it really is not acceptable to leave a concerto soloist unidentified. If someone identifies the cellist and adds his name to the file description, I will cross out this vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:44, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support I like the contrast and the symmetry. Daniel Case (talk) 19:02, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a special orchestra photo. The majority of the musicians do not play.--Ermell (talk) 22:14, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:53, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Brazil

File:Calligrapha fulvipes 275169890.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2023 at 00:22:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Chrysomelidae_(Leaf_Beetles)
Info created by Zygy - uploaded by Nosferattus - nominated by Nosferattus -- Nosferattus (talk) 00:22, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nosferattus (talk) 00:22, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dislike the glare. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:02, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and the size and lack of sharpness. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:46, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Charlesjsharp: Calligrapher beetles are generally quite tiny, so it's unlikely to get a photograph with the entire organism in sharp focus. All the important features of the beetle, however, are sharp here. I think some leeway should be given for subjects this small (while still conforming to the minimum criteria). It's fine if you still choose to oppose, but I hope you will consider the limitations of macro photography when evaluating candidates. Cheers! Nosferattus (talk) 18:19, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - I have experience of the limitations of macro photography. I've not got an FP of a beetle this small. I can't see any EXIF data, so I don't know your camera/lens/settings. It's in focus, but it's not sharp. I imagine you have had to perform a big crop. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:11, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    - @Charlesjsharp: So in cases like this, would you prefer more sharpness/resolution even if it meant sacrificing some depth of field (presumably by increasing magnification and/or tightening the aperture)? For example, what do you think of images like these (ignoring the watermarks): [2][3]? Would you consider those to be featured picture caliber (if they didn't have watermarks)? Nosferattus (talk) 01:00, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      - Sharpness and dof are independent variables. Please share your EXIF. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:43, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
        I assume you're referring to the use of focus stacking? Without it, they are not independent: decreasing aperture will increase depth-of-field at the expense of sharpness, due to diffraction; increasing magnification to fill a larger portion of the frame with the bug will decrease the (effective) aperture, again affecting sharpness due to diffraction. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 12:25, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think this is quite up to current FP standards for macro photography. There's no EXIF to double-check, but I assume the softness is the result of a small aperture and/or a large crop? The best macro images we've seen around here lately are either focus stacks or those that use the limited depth of field to draw the observer's attention to a particular element (e.g. the eye of an insect or a flower's anthems) --Julesvernex2 (talk) 12:37, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't get why this image has so many opposes, it's class. 20 upper 08:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Jules. And general dullness. Daniel Case (talk) 18:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:50, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Echium candicans at Montado do Paredão in Curral das Freiras, Câmara de Lobos, Madeira, 2023 May.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2023 at 02:04:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Boraginaceae
Info created & uploaded by User:Ximonic - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is another in Ximonic's series of photos of Madeira. These flowers are wonderfully colorful and sharply photographed in a lovely background among other flowers. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:23, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support this plant is a bumblebee magnet. -- Ivar (talk) 05:59, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely flowers and amazing background. 20 upper 07:02, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support FP by all means. --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderfully beautiful. Thank you for finding and highlighting this one, Ikan! --Aristeas (talk) 07:11, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure! When I saw it on QIC, I knew it needed to be nominated. Thanks for refining the gallery. I didn't find anything that specific when I looked at COM:FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:38, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support I love the wave of Ximonic's new photos being nominated. I would have nominated this photo, but I already created two nominations currently active. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:21, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:31, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:02, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:22, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 19:40, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 04:29, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:20, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:50, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:56, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:33, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:54, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:04, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 10:47, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 19:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:11, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC) --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:30, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Boraginaceae

Comment Thanks for promoting the photo. How is it missing a gallery? I don't understand. The gallery link works. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:57, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed this by coincidence: I don't know why the bot didn't pick up the gallery, I've added it properly, with underscores to be on the safe side. The bot should understand that and process it at 01:00 pm. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 06:48, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Horace Wilkinson Bridge ("New Bridge"), Baton Rouge, Louisiana at sunset, January 2023.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2023 at 02:05:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#United States of America
Info created by User:WClarke - uploaded by User:WClarke - nominated by WClarke -- wclarke 02:05, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Picture I liked that took of this bridge back in January. Shot this on a Mamiya 7 with Portra 400 and then scanned it digitally -- I think the film definitely provided some interesting, yet still accurate, colors I couldn't get from my DSLR. It was a beautiful sunset. Would love to hear what y'all think. -- wclarke 02:05, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for nominating your shot! I really like the colors. I also like the Portra 400 film grain – we don't have many people these days who nominate film shots. However, you might consider applying some noise correction in post. The compositional weight is a bit too heavy on the right for my taste, but that's easy to correct with a tighter crop on the left. I'm always thrilled when people post their photos here who're not part of the same group of old regulars. So, please feel free to nominate more images! All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:55, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Neutral Great analog capture whose film grain is charming. From time to time I still take pictures with my old Praktica LTL2. When the photo prints are ready, I'm all the more pleased with a successful shot. This increases the appreciation for a single image. Comment In the lower quarter of the image, a part of the water surface is blurred. This may be a post-processing mistake that can be fixed. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:53, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comment I'm very sorry, as long as the blurry area in the bottom quarter is not fixed, I'm changing my vote to Neutral to be on the safe side. Dear WClarke, I hope you receive the ping: Fixing the above mentioned presumed post-processing mistake would be great to save this nomination. Many thanks in advance for your efforts. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 19:05, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Indeed. I love this photo and would love to vote for it, but there is an abrupt transition between sharp and unshap in the foreground water, as spotted by Radomianin. I have tried to mark the right border with an image note. As this is very likely a post-procession mistake, it should be possible to fix this. Please give it a try, this great photo deserves some extra work. --Aristeas (talk) 08:28, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:27, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question How would you feel about decreasing the noise (grain) in this digital version? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:37, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per my remarks and others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:57, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Putting the nostalgia to one side, the noise in the sky is too great e.g. top left. As it is, the end result is not one of our finest. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:44, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment User:WClarke could you write what film was used and to fill manual EXIF ? That would be great. --Mile (talk) 08:52, 13 June 2023 (UTC) p.S. Do you have any drum scanner there, this is worth to try.[reply]
Support OK, I guess it's good enough. 20 upper 08:39, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question To clarify: good enough to be one of the best photos on the site? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:57, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: Definitely but it's on the lower end of the hierarchy. 20 upper 06:53, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:19, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:24, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I would support but some kind of mistake was done, and large area of sea in start is "unfocused". Maybe film wasnt paralel. --Mile (talk) 17:57, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The foreground is blurry, otherwise very good. -- Ivar (talk) 06:02, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:22, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The graininess and the sudden shift in sharpness on the water in the foreground need to be dealt with. Daniel Case (talk) 19:04, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:55, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chiesa di Santa Maria Assunta volta virtù del presbiterio Manerba del Garda.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2023 at 11:57:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Italy
Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:57, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:57, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely ceiling! --SHB2000 (talk) 10:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive photo of an impressive ceiling. I hate to say it but some parts of the dome seem softer than others; but when I downscale the photo to a reasonable size, e.g. 4000 × 4000px, the complete photo is very sharp, thus it’s good for me. Because the photo shows the whole ceiling, it fits IHMO better into our Religious buildings/Ceilings gallery than into our Non-photographic media/Religion gallery; therefore I have taken the liberty to change the gallery link. --Aristeas (talk) 14:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:05, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's just too good. 20 upper 08:33, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:26, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but I cannot see that special or wow here. The angle isn't ideal, and in my opinion we have already more than a hundred better featured pictures of church ceilings. --Stepro (talk) 22:29, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:38, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:58, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Stepro, the ligthing and composition/POV are not at FP level to me. Poco a poco (talk) 06:57, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:04, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Italy

File:Working hands. Bizzilla, or traditional maltese lace-making.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2023 at 19:32:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Others
Info created and uploaded by Renata Apan - nominated by Kritzolina -- Kritzolina (talk) 19:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support One more find from WLF - Maltese lace-making is a dying craft, this image captures it perfectly in my opinion -- Kritzolina (talk) 19:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good focus on the hands at work; photos like this give a lively description of old crafts. --Aristeas (talk) 14:47, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:52, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think we need more FPs showing handicrafts and other folk traditions. This is also likely to be a Valued Image if nominated in the right scope, but I haven't checked other photos in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:20, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not seeing the quality of this image. 20 upper 08:28, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 04:52, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very educational. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:22, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:38, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:01, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 21:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Others

File:Remarkable Rocks 02.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2023 at 07:41:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#South Australia
Info created and uploaded by Bgag - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 07:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Detail resolution could be higher, but it’s an impressive photo of an impressive rock, and the contrast of the rock colours with the sky is nice. --Aristeas (talk) 14:48, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:50, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:53, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. Greater sharpness is also imaginable, but in 2023, I consider this an FP, and it was taken in 2015. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:27, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good image but not Featured material. 20 upper 08:26, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question Could you clarify by what you mean by "not featured material"? Are you suggesting that there's a lack of wow factor (perfectly fine, btw). SHB2000 (talk) 11:39, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SHB2000: That is what I mean, yes. By the way, I'm wondering why you didn't correct my misspelling. 20 upper 06:49, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's bad karma to edit other people's messages except in egregious cases (and your misspelling/typo and your random use of capitalization is not). --SHB2000 (talk) 11:23, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Stepro (talk) 18:35, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:56, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:22, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 04:51, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question Can you eliminate the halos around the rocks? --Llez (talk) 13:40, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like a set from the original Star Trek. Daniel Case (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 01:58, June 20, 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:14, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Australia#South Australia

File:Resurrezione Bernardino Lucinio Lonato.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2023 at 13:06:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Religion#Christianity
Info created and uploaded by Moroder - nominated as suggested by Ikan by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC) Exif data= X2D 100 C ISO 1600 120 mm f/6,3 1/15s.[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! Yann (talk) 14:20, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:24, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very strong nominee, as I said in QIC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:31, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bravissimo! Terragio67 (talk) 15:43, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 16:17, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good image 20 upper 19:22, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:58, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:49, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:06, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 10:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 15:57, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 19:22, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:02, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:50, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:03, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Religion#Christianity

File:Philippe Chaperon by Atelier Nadar.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2023 at 17:04:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by Atelier Nadar - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:04, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:04, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info Fun fact: He has articles on six Wikipedias, and the worst is the French Wikipedia article, barely a stub and a gallery, which is weird, given he's French. Farsi and Egyptian Arabic have slightly more bulked up stubs, and the short but reasonably substantial English, Italian, and Belarussian articles appear to be pretty similar, probably translations. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:06, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice portrait. Yann (talk) 18:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:00, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Portrait could be higher quality; just saying. 20 upper 08:14, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@20 upper: I'd say it's pretty darn good for the 19th century myself, but alright. Not sure how that comment's helpful, given Chaperon's been dead for 117 years, making it very hard to get a new photo. Adam Cuerden (talk) 08:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Adam Cuerden: IMO, the image is of good quality but.....it's not up to standards. 20 upper 08:37, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@20 upper: Well,I'm not the universal arbitrator, and that's... fair if that's your opinion, but more detail about what you don't like would help judge other photos. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:21, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not everyone has to approve restored images as suitable for Commmons FP status, Adam. Would the noise on this image, for instance, look the same if you examined a 19th Century print with a magnifying glass? Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty much, aye; might vary depending on lighting because texture shows up differently in different light and angles. I mean, the originaæ (File: Philippe Chaperon by Atelier Nadar - Original.jpg is a 19th century print, so compare at will. I'm pretty careful with trying to keep texture; I don't use filters. But 20 upper didn't say what the issue was, other than a vague quality statement, which is why I was asking. I'd like to know people's thoughts on these things, because, whether I agree with objections or not, I'd like to understand them. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:30, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:59, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 08:00, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 04:31, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:46, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:59, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:06, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:07, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Men

File:Coral plato (Danafungia scruposa), mar Rojo, Egipto, 2023-04-15, DD 49.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2023 at 17:25:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Anthozoa
Info Coral (Danafungia scruposa), Red Sea, Egypt. They are around 25 centimetres (9.8 in) in diameter and normally eat a variety of food from bacteria to mesozooplankton measuring 1 mm in diameter, although researchers observed the coral consuming the jellyfish Aurelia aurita. This was the first time such behaviour has been seen in the wild and it's not known how the coral captures jellyfish. Its polyps have diameters of up to 24 centimetres (9.4 in) and are oval or circular. D. scruposa is found in the eastern and western Indian Ocean, the eastern central, northwestern and western central Pacific Ocean, Japan, the East China Sea, the Red Sea, and eastern Australia. It's found at depths between 1 and 27 metres (3 ft 3 in and 88 ft 7 in) on the slopes of reefs. Note: we have no FPs of the whole family Fungiidae. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:25, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:25, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I see purple CA as halos on top of the right and left side of the coral. I'm not promising a vote if it's corrected, but it should be corrected if I'm not mistaken in what I'm seeing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:54, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan Kekek: Done, thank you for the hint Poco a poco (talk) 10:01, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks. I think it's unfortunate that you couldn't get more of the coral in your depth of field, but enough of it is quite sharp and detailed at life size to deserve a feature, I think. If the nomination doesn't succeed, it would certainly be likely to be a fine VI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 14:22, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 14:23, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love corals. 20 upper 19:27, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support FP-worthy to me, even if the depth of field is limited. The photo is educative and the subject well-illuminated. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:18, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 19:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan and Radomianin. --Aristeas (talk) 10:30, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:05, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class_:_Anthozoa

File:2023-04-21 Motorsport, ABB FIA Formula E World Championship, Berlin E-Prix 2023 1DX 0666 by Stepro.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2023 at 18:28:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Motorsports
Info Motorsports, ABB FIA Formula E World Championship, Berlin E-Prix 2023: Pascal Wehrlein (GER, TAG Heuer Porsche Formula E Team) is racing in front of a historical troop carrier; created, uploaded and nominated by Stepro
Support -- Stepro (talk) 18:28, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment When you first look at it it looks as if that car is parked. I guess no panning to get the plane in focus. Unfortunately 1/5000 sec and high ISO means little definition/sharpness, but I've never photographed cars racing so apologies if my remarks are unreasonable. (ps it's very bright) Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Motorsport yeah, put that thing in sports......20 upper 07:01, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:22, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too busy to work for me. Also, light is a little harsh and WB a little too cool. Daniel Case (talk)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:St. Amandus - Bad Urach 18.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 06:10:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Single stained glass windows
Info Donor window, inscription: All aisle windows donated by Mrs. fabricant Feodora Groß née Paret in honor of her husband fabricant L. R. Groß † June 10, 1898, Collegiate church St. Amandus, Bad Urach, Baden-Württemberg, Germany; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 06:10, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 06:10, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:02, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:08, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:09, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 16:05, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:48, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:49, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:26, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 19:22, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:16, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:04, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Finally we get more good photos from the beautiful St Amandus church. --Aristeas (talk) 17:05, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:38, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. 20 upper 08:54, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ It is a picture of beautiful and balanced window art.--GeonwooLee (talk) 10:26, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Info Apologies, but only users with at least 50 edits on Commons are eligible to vote, according to the guidelines. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:50, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Single stained glass windows

File:Damisela dominó (Dascyllus trimaculatus) en una anémona magnífica (Heteractis magnifica), mar Rojo, Egipto, 2023-04-18, DD 113.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 17:59:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Pomacentridae_(Clownfish_and_Damselfish)
Info A juvenile threespot dascyllus (Dascyllus trimaculatus) of approx 4 centimetres (1.6 in) length in a magnificent sea anemone (Heteractis magnifica), Red Sea, Egypt. Dascyllus trimaculatus is native to the Indo-Pacific from the Red Sea and East Africa, to the Pitcairn Islands, southern Japan, and Australia, and can also be found in some parts of the Philippines. It feeds on algae, copepods and other planktonic crustaceans. Generally, adults are found in small groups around coral heads or large rocks. Juveniles (like in this case) may be found associated with large sea anemones or sheltering between the spines of diadema sea urchins or branching corals. The magnificent sea anemone is characterized by a flared oral disc, which reaches between 20 and 50 centimetres (7.9 and 19.7 in) in diameter. The numerous tentacles exceed 8 centimetres (3.1 in) long. It's widespread throughout the tropical and subtropical waters of the Indo-Pacific area, from the eastern coasts of Africa, the Red Sea included, to Polynesia and from south Japan to Australia and New-Caledonia. It has been observed down to 40 metres (130 ft) deep. The magnificent sea anemone has two feeding methods. The first one is through the photosynthesis of its symbiotic zooxanthellae, living in its tissues. The second method is through using its tentacles to stun, immobilize, and consume prey (small invertebrates, fry, or juvenile fish). Note: there are no FPs of the genus Dascyllus and genus Heteractis. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:59, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:59, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:57, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful and impressive. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:55, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support +1 -- Radomianin (talk) 23:08, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:05, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:12, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Like something out of Finding Nemo. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:50, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:39, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Exceptional --Tagooty (talk) 09:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes. 20 upper 08:52, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:12, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:54, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Pomacentridae_(Clownfish_and_Damselfish)

File:Town hall of Mont-de-Marsan (6).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 19:14:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info after nominated a set of images Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Town hall of Mont-de-Marsan, there were many votes to nominate only this one photo, which I am doing here. Tournasol7 (talk) 19:18, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 19:14, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 18:29, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 18:29, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Tournasol7: I guess the template {{Withdraw}} has accidentally slipped into your two new nominations. Please remove it from both so that the bot doesn't mistakenly sort them away. Thanks and best, -- Radomianin (talk) 10:55, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Radomianin: , yes, my mistake, sorry. Thanks for bringing it to my attention, Tournasol7 (talk) 18:29, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good capture, impressive light. I repeat here my support according to that in the withdrawn set nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:49, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice, the better of the 2 photos that were nominated as a set. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful sky and very atmospheric. --Aristeas (talk) 08:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:54, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Said on the other nomination that I would support this on its own, and I will, nice shot. BigDom (talk) 20:10, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:09, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good. 20 upper 08:51, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:13, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. JukoFF (talk) 23:27, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:42, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:58, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France

File:Pilsum-LSG-Krummhoern--2022 05 msu-1.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 14:40:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Germany
Info created & uploaded by Matthias Süßen – nominated by Ivar (talk) 14:40, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 14:40, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 16:04, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice but it's tilted in ccw direction (see sea horizon) Poco a poco (talk) 18:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Poco a poco: there is probably some perspective distortion left, because the camera was pointed a bit up, but there is no sea on the horizon (compare with daylight images). -- Ivar (talk) 05:23, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok, sorry, I was mistaken, fine for me then, great shot Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:13, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:14, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 21:36, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:47, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 09:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:06, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:20, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:48, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely background. 20 upper 08:56, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:12, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very peaceful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:12, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:52, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#Germany

File:2022-05-22 50. Internationales Dixieland Festival Dresden 1DX 2056 by Stepro-2.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2023 at 18:28:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Musicians and singers performing
Info 50th International Dixieland Festival Dresden: Allotria Jazz Band on the open-air stage 'Junge Garde', close-up of musician with trombone; created, uploaded and nominated by Stepro
Support -- Stepro (talk) 18:28, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just a man playing an instrument, nothing exceptional here. 20 upper 07:00, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good portrait of a musician at work, strong facial expression. --Aristeas (talk) 07:18, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 07:47, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's that expression, that look that probably anyone who's ever picked up a camera and pointed it at another person will recognise - they have spotted you and are looking through the lens and into your soul. For me, it just takes the musician out of the "zone" and spoils the wow, I'm sorry. BigDom (talk) 15:35, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per 20 upper. -- Karelj (talk) 21:11, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Would be a nice pose, but BigDom explains why it's not featurable. Many of our best—many of the best, indeed—photos of musicians capture that look in the eye that they get when they're absorbed in the music (to the point that many great musicians often have their eyes tightly closed when they're playing at their most intense; my late brother (who I often saw doing that while he played the piano, said it was about seeing the notes clearly). This guy lost that. Daniel Case (talk) 20:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support If it's functionally a posed photo, it's a very good one and I believe it deserves the star on that basis even if not on another. Interesting discussion, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:40, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas and Ikan Kekek. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:38, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:52, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't get 20 upper's rationale behind their oppose vote, though. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:04, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:45, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Musicians and singers performing

File:Treppenhauses Holstenhof (2).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 21:32:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Germany
Info created & uploaded by GZagatta - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 21:32, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 21:32, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 21:37, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:47, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ich kriege Höhenangst ;-) -- -donald- (talk) 12:04, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice Poco a poco (talk) 20:22, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 21:17, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:58, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing. 20 upper 08:48, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:14, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:57, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:59, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Germany

File:Woman lighting the candles for the Festival of Lights in India (cropped).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2023 at 18:29:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info A woman lighting the candles for the Festival of Lights (Diwali, Deepavali) in India. Created by AjoyDutta1997 – (cropped and) nominated by --Aristeas (talk) 18:29, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of the most beautiful contributions to Wiki Loves Folklore 2023 – the ornament, the candles and the gesture of the woman combine to a simple, but intriguing composition. Yes, technically it is not perfect (but good) and the symmetry is not complete, but these little imperfections are understandable for a night shot and IMHO don’t diminish the beauty of the photo. --Aristeas (talk) 18:29, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:50, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very powerful photo: beautiful, harmonious and of warm atmosphere! -- Radomianin (talk) 18:58, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Radomianin Poco a poco (talk) 20:23, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is great! I think there are some disembodied parts of fingers at the bottom of the picture frame, but FP, anyway, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:07, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this hint, Ikan! I have cloned out these small elements. --Aristeas (talk) 06:00, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:18, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support POTY finalist? --SHB2000 (talk) 06:48, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent image --Tagooty (talk) 09:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:39, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:48, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 14:24, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 15:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 20:12, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:07, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 05:50, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely featured material. 20 upper 08:44, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:16, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 15:20, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:58, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ I think it is an image that shows the color of the culture of the country well.--GeonwooLee (talk) 10:20, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question to the community: Is the user GeonwooLee eligible to vote? According to user contributions, less than 50 edits have been done on Commons yet. Thanks in advance and best, -- Radomianin (talk) 10:54, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info Apologies, but only users with at least 50 edits on Commons are eligible to vote, according to the guidelines. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:57, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:35, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:55, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:35, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Events

Comment Arriving too late to vote, the picture is (fairly) speedy promoted, but I would have given a strong support because I find this image amazing. Nice find -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:10, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:David Livingstone by Thomas Annan.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2023 at 16:39:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by Thomas Annan - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:39, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info Restoration notes on file page. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:39, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:39, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing photo for 1864! Good restoration. And wow, what a scowl! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:33, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is going to make it hard to go back to lesser images, I must say. This is one of the best I've seen for the period. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:55, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:48, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 08:47, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:49, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very fine portrait you have over here. 20 upper 08:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:16, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:44, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:32, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Men

File:Отбор проб грунта.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2023 at 19:26:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info Soil sampling from the bottom of the glacial fjord lake (Lake Spartakovskoe) / Created by Nestortech45 - uploaded by Nestortech45 - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 19:26, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 19:26, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Photographer wasn't taking the shot for FPC. Foreground too messy. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:56, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- You're right, the photographer probably didn't even know that Wikimedia Commons existed until after the photo was uploaded. JukoFF (talk) 22:09, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles. Also, very little if anything is sharp. Probably a good and useful VI if nominated, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:37, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Would have supported this if the foreground was much more cleaner. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:50, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it. Doesnt have to be staged shot - People at work. --Mile (talk) 06:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Like Mile, I think the fact it wasn't staged for FPC is a positive, and it has good educational value. But the OOF white thing bottom right is a little distracting, hence the weak support. BigDom (talk) 08:31, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bags are distracting 20 upper 09:20, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --Lupe (talk) 10:15, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral IMHO it’s OK that much is OOF – after all, the photo is similar to an envionmental portrait –, but it’s unfortunate that of all things the irritating bags at the left are quite sharp and that we see the open camera bag at the bottom – it is probably not part of the soil sampling, is it? --Aristeas (talk) 09:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support -- Karelj (talk) 16:46, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Charles and 20upper — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 10:45, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others --Tagooty (talk) 09:39, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This could have been featurable as a quite literally down and dirty picture of some dirty work. But it's too cluttered; the bags are just one example of that. Daniel Case (talk) 03:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:30, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sommet de la Dune du Pilat.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2023 at 14:34:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Nouvelle-Aquitaine
Info On the Dune of Pilat, Arcachon Bay area, France. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 14:34, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 14:34, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment That's nice. How do people feel about the trees leaning to the left going up? Is that OK? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:00, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No trivial point. It's not easy to keep the trees vertical and the horizon straight. When in doubt, I prefer the horizon as a guideline. I made some perspective correction and uploaded a new version. Milseburg (talk) 16:01, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thank you. I'm completely good with there being footprints and a couple of people in the photo. A few more people could have been fine, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:38, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Would be better without footprints. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:00, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is one of France's most visited tourist attractions. I'm glad to only have two people in the picture (and no smoke or paragliders). But without any human traces, it would be inauthentic. Milseburg (talk) 16:03, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good and impressive IMHO. --Aristeas (talk) 17:03, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support It doesn't look to me like the trees are leaning so much as the wind might have shaped them to look that way, and in any event that's not what people will be looking at first in this picture. Daniel Case (talk) 18:17, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per other supporters. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:37, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 19:14, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:25, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France#Nouvelle-Aquitaine

File:Нейрохирургическая операция в Институте Склифосовского.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2023 at 19:14:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info Neurosurgical surgery to remove a brain metastasis at the Sklifosovsky Institute (Moscow) / Created by Sklifosovsky Insitute - uploaded by Sklifosovsky Insitute - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 19:14, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 19:14, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question A staged promotional shot? Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:59, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Sklifosovsky Insituteitute is the main trauma center of a city with a population of 10 million people, there is no time to take staged photographs, you can see other shots uploaded by this author and make sure of it))) JukoFF (talk) 22:05, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As a photo of neurosurgery, it completely fails unfortunately. We can't even see the patient, never mind any actual surgery taking place (if indeed there is any, per Charles' question above). BigDom (talk) 21:13, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you sure it's ethical to show a patient whose head is being cut open? Maybe don't answer that is a rhetorical question) JukoFF (talk) 22:07, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - Like Ikan says, it definitely could be ethical, consent is the key. Maybe if the photo were presented as simply surgeons at work, I could understand, but when the title says neurosurgery and the description says brain metastasis, but we can see neither, then it just doesn't work for me, I'm sorry. BigDom (talk) 08:36, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree that it fails as a photo of neurosurgery, per BigDom, but it succeeds as a composition and has drama. It's really a photo of medical staff who are conducting neurosurgery, not a photo of the surgery or the patient. As for whether it would be ethical to show a photo of the patient: Yes, but only if they were asked and signed a release form before the operation, while they were still clear-headed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:35, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:06, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:14, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan Kekek. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:34, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Heroes at work :) 20 upper 09:21, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 14:13, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan Kekek --LexKurochkin (talk) 22:00, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 08:58, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:23, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:52, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:58, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:03, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:06, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A little bit of CA on darker areas surrounded by light, but otherwise per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 20:38, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:58, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:28, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People at work

File:Brenthis ino - Keila.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2023 at 17:34:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Nymphalidae_(Brush-footed_Butterflies)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 17:34, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:34, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:38, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:30, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 05:33, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful arthropod. 20 upper 08:39, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:09, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:20, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:19, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:39, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 05:00, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:15, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:58, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:40, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:54, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:56, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 26 June 2023 (UTC)--Palauenc05 (talk) 21:15, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Nymphalidae_(Brush-footed_Butterflies)

File:Salzburg Stiftskirche Nonnberg Innenraum 01.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2023 at 18:43:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria
Info Interior of Nonnberg Abbey, Salzburg, federal state of Salzburg, Austria. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:43, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:43, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 20:29, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning! 20 upper 08:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:11, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:19, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Clément Bardot (talk) 15:55, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:39, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:13, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:14, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support +1 --SHB2000 (talk) 08:58, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A pretty humble church but still nice compo Poco a poco (talk) 23:05, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:37, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:53, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 26 June 2023 (UTC)--Palauenc05 (talk) 21:09, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria

File:Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa (Web Summit).jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2023 at 01:25:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by Web Summit - uploaded by Ser.Silv - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 01:25, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 01:25, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment At first glance I miss the usual fill light (or reflector), its absence make the shadows on the right side very deep and let the head merge visually into the background. On the other hand this protects the photo from being totally conventional. I am curious how others assess this … --Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Julesvernex2 below – indeed this kind of lighting seems appropriate for a conservative politician. --Aristeas (talk) 05:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose due to the vignetting on the bottom right. A pity, though; I'd have supported if this was not there. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:01, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I quite like the juxtaposition of a bold portrait for a conservative leaning president (a leaning mimicked by his tie, not sure if that was by chance or by choice!). A pity that the softbox is reflected on the eyes, though.

That is the common Commons interpretation. It was discussed recently in this deletion request and confirmed by most of the people commenting and by the mod who closed the request. --Aristeas (talk) 05:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The image appears to have some vignetting. 20 upper 19:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The vignette needs to be corrected ... yes, at this size it's not a problem, but at full size it is. Daniel Case (talk) 02:44, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:55, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:53, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Head of Sri Lankan axis deer.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2023 at 19:40:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla
Info All by AntanO -- Antan O 19:40, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Antan O 19:40, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Distracting background. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:59, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Oversharpened a bit, IMO. — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 10:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:18, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per SHB2000. I'd otherwise want the DoF to include both ears, but then the fence would be even clearer. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:04, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Terrible background. 20 upper 08:53, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose background, per others. Daniel Case (talk) 02:46, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 04:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Almeja gigante (Tridacna maxima), mar Rojo, Egipto, 2023-04-17, DD 126.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2023 at 21:07:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class : Bivalvia
Info Maxima clam (Tridacna maxima), Red Sea, Egypt. Also known as the small giant clam, they are much sought after in the aquarium trade, as their often striking coloration mimics that of the true giant clam; however, the maximas maintain a manageable size, with the shells of large specimens typically not exceeding 20 centimetres (7.9 in) in length. Bivalves have two valves on the mantle. These siphon water through the body to extract oxygen from the water using the gills and to feed on algae. The small giant clam has the widest range of all giant clam species. It is found in the oceans surrounding east Africa, India, China, Australia, Southeast Asia, the Red Sea and the islands of the Pacific. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:07, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:07, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The lead image in the en:wiki article is a much better image and is already FP. --Tagooty (talk) 13:23, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you elaborate what you mean with "better", Tagooty? I appreciate lots of detail here for example Poco a poco (talk) 17:13, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
To me, the existing FP has better lighting and striking colours. It pops out at me even at review size. At full size, it is clearer. The nominated image has a distracting shadow at the top and is less clear. Hence, IMO it is not good enough to be promoted as a second FP of this clam. Tagooty (talk) 03:35, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for the detail feedback, Tagooty. To me the POV and detail is better here but I seem to be the only one thinking so. Poco a poco (talk) 17:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose This is my first time voting against corals, clams, or other items in that area, and I'm sorry for doing so but I find the image unimpressive and wouldn't even consider it a quality image. 20 upper 14:44, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem with your oppose vote 20 upper, but I still would like to point out that QI and impressive images have nothing to do with each other. A totally boring image can be QI. Poco a poco (talk) 17:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Thanks your the feedback, I take it back Poco a poco (talk) 17:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Diego, perhaps you withdrew too soon? I do agree with you at least on detail, there are details on this 42MP image that are absent from the 12MP one (of course, the larger image is softer at 100%, but that's not how one should compare acutance and resolution). One question though: the colours are significantly different between the two images, is that due to different lighting conditions or different approaches to white balance correction? --Julesvernex2 (talk) 10:32, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Julesvernex2 well, I don't know whether I should have waited longer. Nobody stepped in until you did, 3 days later. And still, getting the first 2 votes as opposes makes it almost impossible to achive a successful nom. Comparing the images I think that the WB can be adjusted a bit to make it warmer, but I wouldn't necessarily expect that the tone is similar, as the spectrum of colors of this clam species is very wide. Poco a poco (talk) 11:30, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Poco a poco (talk) 17:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wle Calafuria 11.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 08:53:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Tuscany
Info created by Anna.Massini - uploaded by Anna.Massini - nominated by Anna.Massini -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive. And even more impressive as I see it was taken with a smartphone. --LexKurochkin (talk) 16:03, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I promoted this at QIC, but I'm unconvinced it's of FP quality. I will deliberate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:48, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Looking again, it's at least quite close to FP quality. But is there any way you might be able to borrow a better camera? You have a very artistic sensibility and would benefit from better equipment. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My art is born in an instant, my photos are "carpe diem" seize the moment. I have a busy life and even if I had better equipment, maybe at the moment of my inspiration I didn't bring it with me, but my smartphone is always in my bag.It is a great satisfaction for me to have managed to convey something beautiful. Thank you with all my heart. (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose FP potential, no doubt about it but half of the image is an uninteresting bush. The composition would have been much better using something like 100 m and focusing on the cliff. The quality is also low, no detail can be appreciated. Poco a poco (talk) 18:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have many photos of the Boccale castle and its cliff, and many of them can be found on wikimedia also by other photographers. This shot is particular and unusual as it was taken for Wiki Loves Earth, for the Calafuria naturalistic area, and for this reason the vegetation was framed more than the castle, which however enriches the photo due to its particularity. This explanation seemed necessary to me. Thank you. (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 07:21, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I like the composition. The bush actually adds feeling of depth to we scene. Without it would significantly less interesting. LexKurochkin (talk) 15:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support For me the composition works very well, the castle is shown in its environment in an impressive and beautiful way. --Kritzolina (talk) 15:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Image is not interesting enough. 20 upper 08:55, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There will be nothing striking in the photo, but there is the majesty of nature in this photo, if you look carefully there is the sunlight on the right that illuminates the bush, the flora of the Calafuria nature reserve, the roughness of nature in the cliff, and the plants that grow there despite the arid and stony environment, with the Boccale Castle in the background. A picture in which the work of man is reconciled with the harmony of nature. Being in that place looking at the sea gives a sense of peace and being in harmony with the world. This I think I managed to photograph. I respect your opinion. Thank you. (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 09:57, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Regardless of the qualitative imperfections, the compositional quality is supreme. I would like to give the photo some deserved love. I agree with your point that smartphones are incredibly practical, but with today's technology, their sensors are far too small. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 12:13, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The light is very good, and the inclusion of the bush is an interesting juxtaposition. --Aristeas (talk) 14:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I agree, it works this way. LexKurochkin (talk) 15:48, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:54, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overprocessed, see grainy texture on bush and wooded slopes. Also I agree that something's lacking compositionally—maybe the image would work with stronger light or less sky. Or both. Daniel Case (talk) 02:51, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't find everything you say right, moreover if I cut a piece of sky, the immensity of the nature of the place would be lost, sea, sky, wild vegetation, greenery in an arid place, cliff on the sea. The photo is part of the protected areas of the wiki loves earth. Thanks anyway. (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 07:09, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
CommentSurely this FP will not pass, but I say that I proposed it not for personal pride but to make this place and the magnificence of the nature of this place known. I want to thank those who have understood my message, for your sensitivity.(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:14, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Anna.Massini(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:14, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It has 6 supporting votes vs. 3 opposing votes, so it could be as likely to pass as fail. But I'm going to share something with you. When I was in college, a placement audition I did as part of a routine procedure at the beginning of a semester was once criticized in the following way: I was told that in professional auditions, the judges look for someone who can play every note accurately, in rhythm, and with all the correct dynamics and articulations, and then they look for something extra. The judge said: "You have the something extra, but you don't always play the notes accurately. Why don't you practice more?" In that instance, the problem was not that my equipment was less than professional (in fact, I still use the same instruments today as a professional), but that I wasn't taking the placement exams seriously enough as practice for professional auditions, but I think there is an analogy to be made, so I would say to you: You have that something extra, but on FPC, we also count execution. Yes, it's really useful to have a cellphone at the ready. I take a lot of cellphone photos, but I have yet to upload any of them to Commons, because I have not yet figured out things like how to do perspective correction on an iPhone. Your cellphone photos are very good, but I believe that someone at your level of artistry deserves to have more professional equipment to develop further capabilities and be able to take more photos that are clearly among the very best on the site. I know in the past, Wikipedia societies in several countries have lent professional cameras to photographers who needed them for professional development. Are you sure you are uninterested in that? I'd like to think it's still possible for someone who's already developed a lot, as I believe you have, based on the work you've submitted. Note that I have no personal knowledge of whether these kinds of activities are still occurring, nor how they work, but those, anyway, are my thoughts. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for sharing your experience, I'll share mine too. I well understood that I need better equipment, but for the moment I have no intention of buying or borrowing from someone, as these are such delicate things that I don't want them to break and then have to pay them back. Having said that, every now and then I allow myself to nominate FP when the photos convey particular emotions, especially when it comes to capturing particular lights, like the one on the bush from the right. About 20 years ago I started taking photographs precisely for the sake of immortalizing light. It happened that my mother became blind due to a rare disease, she could only perceive great flashes of light, and so I, at the time young, identified with her and realized how lucky I was to be able to see all the beauty of the world and of nature, I imagined how terrible it would be not to be able to see anymore, and since then I have tried, although a camera is not as powerful as a human eye, to capture all the nuances of light. For over 20 long years I have been my mother's eyes, daily, my eyes have seen for me and for her. I tell this so that you can understand the origin of my sensitivity, which seems like art, but it was an emotional journey. And I get excited when those who don't know me can understand. It means that through a photo I can convey emotions.Thank you. (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 13:11, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing, and I understand. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Love the clouds! --SHB2000 (talk) 13:56, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:23, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Milseburg (talk) 13:27, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would appreciate it if you could better explain your dissenting vote. Thank you in advance. (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 13:47, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Composition isn`t outstanding enough for FP in my eyes. Sky and bush are too dominating. Also grainy in detail. + Horizon is slightly tilted. I wonder about the stern of the ship. Not good enough for FP. Milseburg (talk) 12:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
okay. Thank you for your explanation. The dominant bush and sky, it is precisely because the photo was taken for Wiki loves earth, and therefore it is wanted. In the context of wild nature in an arid environment, with fascinating elements such as sea and cliffs, the beautiful Castello del Boccale can be seen in the background. It's all intended both to emphasize the nature of the place and not the Castle, of which there are many other photos on Wikimedia. Out of curiosity, I can say that the ships are still at sea waiting to enter the port of Livorno. A thousand thanks. (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 12:41, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 13:52, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Poco a Poco --Tagooty (talk) 15:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:33, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CommentThank you all for your support and also for your criticisms which I will keep in mind for the future.(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 15:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Anna.Massini(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 15:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Italy#Tuscany

File:West Cape, Dhilba Guuranda-Innes NP 20230209 1.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2023 at 08:45:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#South Australia
Info created and uploaded by DXR - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 08:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I realise that non-nature enthusiasts may claim that there's no wow factor, but I think the cape can speak for itself. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's not doing much for me, at least so far, but at any rate, a dust spot toward the upper left should be eliminated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:50, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you both, I corrected the dust spot. --DXR (talk) 09:03, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose This is a really good QI, but I just don't think the sky is interesting enough for this to be special enough for FP. Or I could say I'm feeling no wow. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:58, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:53, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:08, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Post office of Mont-de-Marsan (3).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 19:20:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France

* I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 19:20, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 04:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 04:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 21:29, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Tournasol7: If this withdrawal is also a mistake, please disable the template {{Withdraw}} so that the bot will not remove this nomination. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:57, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done, Tournasol7 (talk) 04:12, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe not the most obviously wowing photo, but a satisfying composition and very well executed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:01, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:33, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:56, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Far from perfect but just quality enough. 20 upper 08:49, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but I cannot see that specialfor FP nomination. Just building. -- Karelj (talk) 09:19, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:13, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:59, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:32, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:57, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:35, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:58, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France

File:Jewelry designing (edited).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 23:05:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info Photo of a jewelry designer in India. In the original, the curtain in the right part is wider than in this derivative. I also removed some color fringing as well as the banding/posterization on the curtain. Additionally I improved the contrast and hue. Probably a big counter argument could be the curtain on the right side. In my opinion it opens the view to the woman and gives her more importance and the scenery more depth. I'm looking forward to your reviews.
Created and uploaded by Ankur Tambde - Derived version uploaded and nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 23:05, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:05, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:47, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support For me, the curtin adds more photographic value. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:05, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support - good subject, composition. Just a weak because the colors feels a little oversaturated for the light, and possible some other processing that could be toned down slightly. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:49, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New version uploaded I have reduced the saturation by 10 percent. I considered the strong colors still tolerable as a creative freedom of the photographer. So, many thanks for your constructive hint, Rhododendrites. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:15, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 15:38, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 15:44, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive and authentic environmental portrait; thank you for nominating it! --Aristeas (talk) 17:07, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:36, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:22, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:49, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 15:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I feel like the image is too dark. 20 upper 08:46, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ It's a picture that shows the daily lives of ordinary people in India, and it's quite impressive.--GeonwooLee (talk) 10:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Info Apologies, but only users with at least 50 edits on Commons are eligible to vote, according to the guidelines. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:58, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:34, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:56, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:58, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 08:57, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Surely another POTY finalist! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:36, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--SHB2000 (talk) 06:28, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People at work

File:Pez estandarte del mar Rojo (Heniochus intermedius), mar Rojo, Egipto, 2023-04-15, DD 36.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2023 at 21:02:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Chaetodontidae_(Butterflyfishes)
Info Red Sea bannerfish (Heniochus intermedius), Red Sea, Egypt. The Red Sea bannerfish attains as maximum total length of 18 centimetres (7.1 in) and is native to the western Indian Ocean where it is found in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. It's associated with coral reefs where it is most frequently recorded as a solitary fish or in pairs, although large schools have been recorded. The juveniles form large schools, particularly in areas of deep reef where there is a low density of corals. They feed on both zooplankton and benthic invertebrates but the extent to which they feed on live coral has still to be determined. It is an oviparous species which forms monogamous pairs for spawning. It's collected for the aquarium trade but its collection is of a limited scale and is not believed to be a threat to the species population. Note: we have no FPs of the genus Heniochus. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support please fix small area with CA. -- Ivar (talk) 09:59, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ivar: Done, thank you Poco a poco (talk) 10:42, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is a beautiful fish. Its size wasn't mentioned in the file description, but per w:Red Sea sailfin tang, "Zebrasoma desjardinii grows to a maximum length of 40 cm (16 in)," so this is not a small fish. The level of detail is good, but whether it should be sharper for FP is something I haven't decided on. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:56, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Ikan Kekek, there was a copy & paste issue in the description. It's a Red Sea bannerfish (Heniochus intermedius) with a max length of 18 centimetres (7.1 in), not so big like the w:Red Sea sailfin tang. Poco a poco (talk) 06:21, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That's quite different! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:28, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support With that being its size, I think this is an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:29, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:04, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 09:12, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although I don't have much knowledge of coral fish, this specific fish is stunning. 20 upper 14:31, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:55, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:23, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Terragio67 (talk) 03:58, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:48, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colors. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support What depth was this shot in? -- (talk) 22:42, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Micha: I guess about 20 m. Poco a poco (talk) 05:30, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /SHB2000 (talk) 06:11, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Chaetodontidae_(Butterflyfishes)

File:Haus-Feldwespe (Polistes dominula) Nest focus stack-20230607-RM-121713.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2023 at 21:44:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family : Vespidae (Hornets, Paper Wasps, Potter Wasps, and Yellowjackets)
Info created & uploaded by Ermell - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 21:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 21:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really fascinating, awesome details. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:33, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 05:25, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. How come no adult wasps are in the area? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:01, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Info The nest was in my greenhouse and the one queen wasp was not always present. Unfortunately, I had to remove the nest to be able to enter the house during the summer.--Ermell (talk) 10:30, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:48, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:13, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:05, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great Poco a poco (talk) 20:22, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for nom and support.--Ermell (talk) 05:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. --Aristeas (talk) 08:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:00, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:24, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Could be more centered. 20 upper 08:47, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:56, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light, very detailed -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:02, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love the golden brown background, and the way you might think it a flower at first. Daniel Case (talk) 03:52, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support At first glance I didn't understand exactly what object it was. Then, looking closely at the details, I was positively impressed by your image and your skills... Terragio67 (talk) 15:37, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:35, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:46, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family : Vespidae (Hornets, Paper Wasps, Potter Wasps, and Yellowjackets)

File:William John Macquorn Rankine by Thomas Annan.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2023 at 19:47:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by Thomas Annan - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:47, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info When I nominated the Livingstone image, I said it was going to be hard to move on to something different. So I stuck with Annan for now, because there's some beautiful prints of his work out there. Basic dust/scratch/damage cleanup; slight levels adjustment.
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:47, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good portrait. Good restoration, but I think there is a frayed area on the lower right (viewer's left) of the cloak that wouldn't have been there and could be eliminated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:48, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think I see where you mean. It does have a fairly crinkly texture, though, so I'll go in carefully. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:17, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comparing it with other prints, unsure if changes should happen. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:58, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:44, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:51, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive portrait. --Aristeas (talk) 06:52, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support +1 -- Radomianin (talk) 14:21, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:18, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam seems to enjoy portraits from the late 19th or early 20th century. 20 upper 14:35, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia needs them, after all. And one rarely needs photo restoration on a sufficiently modern photo, and ones 1927-2000 are rarely out of copyright. There's some from that era - Rosa Parks has an FP, Carl Van Vechten and Carol Highsmith did releases - but it's rarer.

Basically, it's the sweet spot for availability Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:27, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:34, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Men

File:Flinders Chase National Park 01.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2023 at 11:04:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#South Australia
Info created and uploaded by Bgag - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 11:04, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is actually only taken a few metres away from this other FP candidate, for anyone who's interested. Otherwise, I'm primarily nominating this because of the contrast. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:04, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 14:24, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Good luck. 20 upper 08:46, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please elaborate by "good luck". SHB2000 (talk) 12:28, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A swirl, a twirl, a turn, the circle widens, the circle expands, an editing galore, there for all to see; one user barred, the other not, two different souls but with the same intention, one questions the other who's on a mission, a mission of determination, inclination and desire, it's not a question of where it started but where it's heading, as different as they seem they both share the same origin, an origin deep within themselves, too intricate, too complex for either to comprehend. 20 upper 16:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're a poet? But who's barred? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:05, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I will admit – even though this nomination may not end up successful, 20 upper's poem gave me a good chuckle. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's good writing, but I find it cryptic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:39, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In shadows inked, words dance their mystery. Whispers veiled in lines, a puzzle to decree. Beyond the surface lies a tale, enigmatic key. It ain't a question of whether it's cryptic, but whether it's poetic. Who said cryptic words can't make thoughts shine? (sarcasm disclaimer) --SHB2000 (talk) 13:52, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I totally agree. 20 upper 14:12, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I do not here anythin special for FP nomination. -- Karelj (talk) 09:27, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good colors but IMHO not enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 15:18, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks a bit dark and dull in thumbnail size, but works much better in large view. It’s a grand and spacious landscape, and I like the generous division into the red of the foreground, the yellowish green of the midground, the dark turquoise sea and the blue sky. Detail resolution is a bit low, but thanks to the great lines of the landscape, this does not bother me here. --Aristeas (talk) 18:50, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:44, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think this is the best angle for a sandy bay and quality or lighting are not overcompensating it, sorry, Poco a poco (talk) 23:04, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Certainly a nice picture, but I think it's too dark to highlight the colors sufficiently, and partly as a result, the only really colorful area is the foreground with the red lichen(?). The quality seems questionable to me, too: The sky is a bit noisy, and nothing is that sharp. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:08, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also looks like lichen to me (and per [4]). SHB2000 (talk) 08:30, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Colors and composition work but the light's a little too dull; also seems a little oversharpened. Daniel Case (talk) 20:46, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Micha (talk) 22:32, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:30, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Herding sheep353 (edited).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2023 at 15:33:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
Info Original created and uploaded by Azonesa - Edited derivative by -- Radomianin (talk) 07:52, 29 June 2023 (UTC) - nominated by Kritzolina -- Kritzolina (talk) 15:33, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is another find from Wiki Loves Foklore. The purely technical quality might not be pixel perfect, but the perspective and the light and colors make it exceptional for me. I hope you agree that this is one of our finest. -- Kritzolina (talk) 15:33, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is one of my favourites, too; the simple elegant shape has some abstract beauty. --Aristeas (talk) 15:50, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Good luck. 20 upper 08:41, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:18, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support educational. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:19, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:57, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:57, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 02:03, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:39, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I'm sorry, but the blue CA on the sheep is just not working for me.* Support Better now. Daniel Case (talk) 04:41, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative created Modifications: Chromatic aberrations removed, gentle denoising and sharpening applied. Dear reviewers @Kritzolina, Aristeas, 20 upper, SHB2000, MZaplotnik, XRay, GRDN711, ArionEstar, and Daniel Case: Thanks very much for your helpful review, Daniel. Since the image is participating in the current Wiki Loves Folkore 2023 contest, I have created a derivative. The link of this existing nomination I have changed to the derivative version. I also had to re-name the nomination page. Sorry for mass pinging, but it seems necessary in this case. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 09:40, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for your help and for the thoughtful way you went about improving without disturbing other processes! Kritzolina (talk) 10:24, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, this is a very welcome improvement! --Aristeas (talk) 13:57, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Interesting Poco a poco (talk) 19:54, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 05:09, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)

File:Mountains Reflection Sani Zanskar Oct22 A7C 04247.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2023 at 09:34:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
Info created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 09:34, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The "greenery" in the reflection contrasts with the barren mountains -- Tagooty (talk) 09:34, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A stark landscape. --Aristeas (talk) 16:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Dust spot upper right. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:53, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done@Ikan Kekek: Thanks for pointing this out. --Tagooty (talk) 01:22, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thank you. This is quite an interesting view to look at. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:03, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose This image is a bit off, it's not giving me the wow factor. 20 upper 08:43, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:02, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Per 20 upper. -- Karelj (talk) 09:22, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:17, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Anyone who has a decent sense of appreciation for nature would know that this image gives more than just the wow factor. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:20, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:21, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The thmumbnail does not reveal the Wow, but looking at it at a big screen definitely does! --Kritzolina (talk) 21:13, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:57, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan Terragio67 (talk) 03:50, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Good image, yes, but feels like it was cropped from a wider image that would be the real FA. Daniel Case (talk) 20:47, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Info @Daniel Case: This is the uncropped 6kx4k image. --Tagooty (talk) 02:34, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What I mean is that I feel like I would like to see a whole panorama of that valley, even if it's not the image that was shot. Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

* Aha! This is the widest image I have of the reflection. Much wider images of the valley are in Category:Sani,_Zanskar --Tagooty (talk) 03:09, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:38, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I've to agree with Daniel, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 19:53, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Navneetsharmaiit (talk) 18:28, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 17:10, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#India