Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/May 2005

This is an archive for Commons:Featured picture candidates page debates and voting.
The debates are closed and should not be edited.

Image:My_Son.jpg, not featured

• Self-nomination, no vote. - Ravn 11:35, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support David.Monniaux 11:54, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support. villy ♦ ✎ 08:44, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Quistnix 23:34, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose norro 08:26, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Peregrine981 12:13, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Pixeltoo 14:04, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose WεFt 09:43, 5 May 2005 (UTC)

• Result: 3 Support, 4 Oppose => not featured norro 16:44, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Strasbourg-RemiLeblond-BateauMouche.jpg, not featured

• Self-nomination - Rémi
• Oppose LoopZilla 20:50, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Mboverload 07:56, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose. villy ♦ ✎ 08:45, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - colors, composition. IMHO, the bateau is too large to be blurred. - Ravn 10:35, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - it could be one more of your really great pictures of Strassbourg which are in very impressive light if the boat would not be this disturbing. It feels just to unreal. I think I would give a support if the river would be empty and silent but if you want to show a boat it seems faster shutter speed is necessary. Andreas Tille 06:47, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Thomas G. Graf 12:04, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose the blur is too much for me --Quasipalm 18:41, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Result: 0 Support, 7 Oppose => not featured norro 17:05, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:William-Adolphe Bouguereau (1825-1905) - At the Edge of the Brook (1875).jpg, featured

• Nominate and Support: Thuresson 21:46, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support —FoeNyx 23:08, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support David.Monniaux 05:28, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support. villy ♦ ✎ 08:45, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support good nomination. Ravn 08:54, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support - Great ! -- Fabien1309 12:30, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Thomas G. Graf 18:12, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support Wery nice colours. // Solkoll 14:19, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Quasipalm 18:39, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose -- Pixeltoo 13:48, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Fanghong 02:06, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

• Result: 10 Support, 1 Oppose => featured norro 17:13, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Strasbourg_River_Ill.jpg, not featured

• Self-nomination, no vote. I'd just like to jump on the Strasbourg bandwagon. ;) -- Ravn 09:03, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support David.Monniaux 09:23, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support LoopZilla 13:01, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Quistnix 23:35, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose -- Too blurry for my taste, though it's a good pano. Dori | Talk 04:02, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose ack Dori. norro 08:30, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose ack Dori + backlight -- Bernd Untiedt 16:22, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose is this a tourist photo? that person on the right with a big grin looking at the camera struck me as odd ;-) --Quasipalm 18:39, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Yes, that part of the photo is.. ;) I've got another one without people on it, but the resulting pano was not that good. -- Ravn 08:28, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Support nice evening shot; good sense of place Fg2 04:42, May 6, 2005 (UTC)

Result: 4 Support, 4 Oppose => not featured norro 12:46, 7 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Dlr_emu_at_tower_gateway.jpg, not featured

• Nominate LoopZilla 09:18, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose dull colors, not sharp Ravn 10:42, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose not sharp, not "impressive" scene, saturated white background David.Monniaux 18:54, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose focus, lighting, and background are not right -- Quistnix 06:29, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Thomas G. Graf 12:02, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose -- Bernd Untiedt 16:22, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Result: 0 Support, 5 Oppose => not featured norro

Image:Agalychnis callidryas.jpg, featured

Agalychnis callidryas (red-eyed treefrog) in Barro Colorado Island, Panama by Christian R. Linder.

• Support —Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 09:22, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Weak oppose - too dark Weak Support - I just noticed that it looks better on a different screen. I'd like to have it a little lighter nonetheless. -- Ravn 10:43, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support AtelierJoly 11:10, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support Dori | Talk 13:09, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support David.Monniaux 18:49, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support norro 19:21, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support WεFt 20:44, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support // Solkoll 14:21, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Quasipalm 18:37, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Fanghong 02:08, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Ulenspiegel 10:57, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --fir0002 12:04, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 12 Support, 0 Oppose => featured norro 14:44, 7 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:M1-A1 Abrams Fire.jpg, not featured

• Nominate and Support -- Fabien1309 13:00, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support Dori | Talk 13:12, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support David.Monniaux 18:43, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Don't think, it's special. norro 08:27, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Thomas G. Graf 11:59, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support Groucho 16:00, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose somehow, it looks incomplete -- Quistnix 20:08, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - not particularly interesting angle. People don't see tanks firing every day, but that doesn't mean its an interesting photo as a photo. Peregrine981 10:16, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Urban 04:55, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose--Fanghong 02:09, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose WεFt 09:43, 5 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 4 Support, 7 Oppose => not featured norro 14:46, 7 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Red Panda.JPG, featured

• Nominate and Support -- Fabien1309 13:01, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support Dori | Talk 13:12, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support LoopZilla 14:31, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support Ravn 14:50, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support could we get more resolution please? David.Monniaux 18:51, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support norro 19:20, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support WεFt 20:44, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support —FoeNyx 21:17, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• support - tsca 13:12, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Thomas G. Graf 12:02, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support higer resolution would be great --Quasipalm 18:35, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support James F. (talk) 18:24, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Result: 12 Support, 0 Oppose => featured norro 14:49, 7 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Copenhagen new operahouse interior.jpg, not featured

• Nominate Quistnix 00:14, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC) (self-nomination)
  • Note: at first glance, it didn't even look good enough for uploading to Commons. However, this picture somehow looks better each time I look at it - which is unusual.
• Oppose I don't really like the viewpoint. Dori | Talk 03:15, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose bad composition David.Monniaux 06:16, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose ack. - Ravn 08:33, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose ack. --Thomas G. Graf 12:00, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support GerardM 23:30, 7 May 2005 (UTC) If this were an artist impression this is where the persons would have been placed. It would as much try to show how nice/modern this operahouse is..

Result: 1 Support, 4 Oppose => not featured norro 12:39, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Musiktheater im Revier.jpg, featured

• Nominate AndreasPraefcke 07:41, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Note: I like this picture (that I found on de.wikipedia when transferring images of theatre buildings to the Commons for the gallery Theatre buildings) because it shows that otherwise (in daylight) rather bland building (see [1]) in an interesting way, also highlighting the interior very nicely.
• support - tsca 13:13, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support norro 16:05, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support a bit surreal/artsy, but still good. Dori | Talk 23:15, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support Rémi
• Support Very good - but a little bit small -- Bernd Untiedt 16:26, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support Pixeltoo 14:05, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Ulenspiegel 10:55, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support great dusk shot. Wish the sign on the right weren't there but the shot is worthwhile even with it, and the photographer chose a sky that matches the sign nicely. Fg2 04:45, May 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Support LoopZilla 17:37, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 9 Support, 0 Oppose => featured norro 12:42, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:VWbubblafront 1949.jpg, not featured

Image by w:sv:Användare:Hasse A

I love this image, not just because it is technically a good picture, (it is intended as an illustration of the frontpart of the car, this is why it only shows that). But also because the reflextions in the paintjob, the windows and the chrome. It's a image of two worlds: the normal and the morphed mirror world. See the page about VW created by Hasse: w:sv:VW, (and the some 50 sub-pages, also by Hasse, a former employe of V.A.G.) and get impressed =)

• Nominate & support // Solkoll 13:46, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - this picture is neither in color or in b&w -- Quistnix 14:48, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• support Greudin
• Support David.Monniaux 16:12, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose I'd rather see the entire car, and I think the reflections detract from the image a bit, rather than enhance it. Dori | Talk 22:47, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Thomas G. Graf 12:01, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Ravn 20:21, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support LoopZilla 14:09, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose WεFt 09:44, 5 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 4 Support, 5 Oppose => not featured norro 15:08, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Les Cressonnières.JPG, not featured

• Nominate and Support David.Monniaux 19:08, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Something doesn't look right (don't know if it's not sharp enough, colors are wrong, or overexposed?). Dori | Talk 22:50, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose In my opinion a nice postcard shot norro 22:08, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support It's a bit more than just that -- Quistnix 05:12, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Almost... Somehow the composition is a bit off. Sky a bit overexposed. Peregrine981 12:15, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral Looks like there is a color cast in parts of the image. --Ulenspiegel 10:53, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose WεFt 09:44, 5 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose => not featured norro 15:20, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Flaming cocktails.jpg, featured

• Nominate and Support norro 14:13, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Quistnix 14:22, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Fabien1309 15:18, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support Dori | Talk 15:21, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support clear and striking - Jersyko 16:02, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support AtelierJoly 09:39, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Quasipalm 18:33, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support. Already FP on en, by the way. --MarkSweep 19:08, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support JennaMarie83 15:45, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support James F. (talk) 18:24, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support Terrific pic and wonderful illustration of the subject. --Tysto 04:59, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support David.Monniaux 12:33, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 12 Support, 0 Oppose => featured norro 15:29, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Lightmatter lion catnap.jpg, not featured

• Nominate and Support -- Fabien1309 15:16, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose I'd like to see the entire lion, plus more resolution Dori | Talk 15:23, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose ack Dori Ravn 20:17, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support Mbube ;-) -- Quistnix 20:17, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose low resolution --Quasipalm 18:33, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• support Greudin
• Support an interesting view of the lion, less cliché than many of our animal shots Peregrine981 12:20, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral Terrific, but needs to be hi-res. Seems too closely cropped. --Tysto 04:57, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

Result 4 Support, 3 Oppose => not featured norro 22:12, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Lightmatter wild squirrel.jpg, not featured

• Nominate and Support -- Fabien1309 15:16, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

no vote - badly needs more resolution! - Jersyko 16:04, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Oppose norro 16:23, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose resolution Ravn 20:18, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose low resolution --Quasipalm 18:33, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral very good photo, low resolution -- Quistnix 08:20, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• support Greudin

Result 2 Support, 3 Oppose => not featured norro 22:18, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Lightmatter seal.jpg, not featured

• Nominate and Support -- Fabien1309 15:16, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Only a glimpse of the seal norro 16:27, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Ack norro -- Quistnix 20:05, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose ack Ravn 20:18, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose low resolution --Quasipalm 18:32, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Very illustrative, but low res. --Tysto 04:53, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

Result 1 Support, 5 Oppose => not featured norro 22:20, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Lightmatter panda.jpg, not featured

• Nominate and Support -- Fabien1309 15:16, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose I don't really like the tree in the foreground norro 16:28, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose resolution, composition Ravn 20:19, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose great pic but low resolution --Quasipalm 18:32, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• support Greudin
• Oppose Unremarkable composition; not hi-res. Nice panda, tho. He looks delicious... if I were, you know, gonna eat a panda. --Tysto 04:52, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose => not featured norro 22:22, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Borough_of_Newham.jpg, not featured

• Nominate and Support LoopZilla 12:53, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose artsy for the sake of being artsy, can't see anything due to the dark. Dori | Talk 23:47, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose ack -- Quistnix 05:04, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose WεFt 13:36, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Sorry. No spark. --Tysto 04:48, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose => not featured norro 22:23, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Herblay.jpg, not featured

• Nominate and Support LoopZilla 21:33, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose The JPEG artifacts have ruined the image, do you have an uncompressed/not as compressed version? Dori | Talk 23:49, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose The top of the building in the centre of the photo is just outside the picture -- Quistnix 05:03, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose => not featured norro 22:24, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Common_snail.jpg, featured

• Nominate and Support --Civvi 22:28, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support good image, but a higher resolution would be much better. Dori | Talk 23:50, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support norro 13:53, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support --FoeNyx 15:26, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support WεFt 13:32, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Quistnix 16:17, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Pixeltoo 20:58, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- tsca 13:13, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Very illustrative, but not especially artful. Not hi-res enough. --Tysto 04:45, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose => featured norro 18:21, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Breslau Ring Ostseite (1890-1900).jpg, featured

• Nominate and Support --Quasipalm 22:34, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support. I like this picture a lot. It has very nice colors. Ben 02:53, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• support Greudin
• support Ausir 19:26, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• support WεFt 13:32, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Fabien1309 13:30, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Result: 6 support, 0 oppose => featured norro 18:27, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Polydactyly 01 Lhand AP.jpg, featured

• Nominate and Support I can't explain why --Quasipalm 22:38, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support can't explain either Dori | Talk 23:51, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support who needs an explanation? -- Quistnix 05:00, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support Greudin
• Support --FoeNyx 15:26, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support JennaMarie83 15:42, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support tsca 10:22, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Is this outstanding against other radiographies aside from this one finger? It's an interesting object, but in my opinion no brilliant picture. norro 16:13, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Thomas G. Graf 17:29, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose--Fanghong 02:14, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support This is a beautiful radiograph and stunningly illustrative of its subject. The detail of the fingernails is fascinating. --Tysto 04:42, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support —Christiaan 00:08, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support David.Monniaux 12:31, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support LoopZilla 10:27, 3 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose => featured norro 18:31, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Herblay5.jpg, not featured

• Nominate (alternative, less compression) LoopZilla 07:26, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• support mais ça fout le cafard Greudin
• Oppose the top of the building in the centre is just outside the picture -- Quistnix 08:18, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• support WεFt 13:35, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support Altho I'm a little bothered by the chopping of the center building, I find this strangely compelling. And I love the DOUCHES sign. --Tysto 04:38, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose norro 08:04, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

Result 3 support, 2 oppose >= not featured norro 17:00, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Sea lions.jpg, not featured

• Nominate and support JennaMarie83 15:31, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support Laineypaige 15:40, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Can't really identify the single bodies, buoy is cut norro 15:50, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose WεFt 13:31, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Kind of a cute pic, but nothing really special. --Tysto 04:33, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• support chance is one in a thousand.--Smartneddy 07:06, 2005 May 11 (UTC)

Result 3 support, 3 oppose => not featured norro 17:01, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Landschaft Zug.jpg, not featured

• self-nomination, just curious. --Baikonur 22:42, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Too dark to see the trees, which are a dull subject anyway. Dori | Talk 00:21, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support LoopZilla 12:43, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose cf Dori's comment WεFt 13:31, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Ack. Dori norro 15:10, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose lacks brightness and an interesting subject -- Quistnix 16:14, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support Nice atmospheric pic. Peregrine981 10:12, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support Pixeltoo 14:07, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral A little fill flash and clarify filter seems to help. Landschaft_Zug --Tysto 04:30, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured norro 17:04, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Condoleezza_capoeira.jpg, not featured

• Nominate and Support LoopZilla 12:38, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - nothing special -- Quistnix 16:13, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Ack. Quistnix norro 16:15, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Pixeltoo 20:57, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose--Fanghong 02:16, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Tysto 04:22, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose => not featured norro 17:11, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Sailing.jpg, featured

• Nominate and Support I think it is superb.
  Pabix &; 18:02, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support - So do I -- Fabien1309 18:39, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Lovely juxtaposition, but the water's color is all weird due to the compression I think. Dori | Talk 22:55, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Quistnix 01:01, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral A great pic I stumbled upon before. But Dori is right - in full resolution, the quality is not very good. Perhaps it will be better, resampling it. --Avatar 11:08, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral Why is the water violet?
• Oppose norro 20:50, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Fanghong 02:19, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --FoeNyx 14:05, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support WεFt 09:46, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose pretty, but a bit bland. Peregrine981 03:45, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 2 neutral => featured

Image:Downtown Chicago Illinois Nov05 img 2648.jpg, not featured

• Self nomination Maybe it's just that I'm easy to amuse, but I found this weird combination funny enough to take its picture (p.s. first self-nom so felt like going with something unusual). Dori | Talk 02:52, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Little bit weird, but in my opinion not something special. --Avatar 11:05, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support Irony--Fanghong 02:23, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose A little too on-the-nose. Would be a good illustration for irony tho (instead of Hitler). --Tysto 04:16, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose WεFt 09:46, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Seem conscious. There must be aspects that let others think unconscious. --Ananda 15:41, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Fabien1309 17:14, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support I like -- even if it was intentional --Quasipalm 04:04, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose => not featured norro 10:58, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Holland Batavia at shipyard.jpg, not featured

• Nominate Quistnix 06:03, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) (self-nomination)
• Oppose but very nice. norro 16:44, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral wish I could see more of the ship, but the detail is good. Dori | Talk 03:16, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Nice but awkwardly framed. --Tysto 03:49, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • I was already leaning over the edge of the pier for as much as I could ;) There was a modern type of stairs just a little below the edge of the picture -- Quistnix 16:27, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose WεFt 09:46, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
• support grand ship:)--Smartneddy 07:10, 2005 May 11 (UTC)
• support--Shizhao 20:34, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose framing doesn't do it for me --Quasipalm 04:02, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured norro 10:59, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Chateau Laurier at night.jpg, not featured

• Nominate Peregrine981 10:10, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) (not a self nomination, pic fetched from english wikipedia)
• Oppose Too much action, blur --Avatar 11:02, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Ack. avatar norro 16:45, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Beautiful shot, but the building needs to be sharper. As for the traffic: the more blur the better in this kind of image. --Tysto 03:49, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose WεFt 09:47, 5 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 0 support, 4 oppose => not featured norro 11:01, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Christmas_Decoration.jpg, featured

• Nominate and Support even if it is the wrong time of year :-) --Avatar 10:52, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose I don't like the lighting. Dori | Talk 02:55, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose too many items in the photo; it makes me restless -- Quistnix 04:20, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support Very nice, altho in a Halmark-card kind of way. --Tysto 03:43, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Nice atmosphere and composition. Peregrine981 08:47, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Nice --fir0002 12:05, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support WεFt 09:47, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support for the right part, Oppose for the left ... → Neutral :p FoeNyx 14:59, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support - Nice light -- Fabien1309 17:15, 12 May 2005 (UTC)~
• Support getting in a christmas mood Tbc 20:29, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose--Shizhao 20:34, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Quasipalm 04:02, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral => featured norro 11:03, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Maulringschluessel.jpg, featured

• Nominate and Support clean, nice, informative --Avatar 10:58, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support norro 16:46, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support LoopZilla 21:50, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support Nice and clean, hard to do with tools. Dori | Talk 02:13, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support—FoeNyx 11:34, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Fabien1309 13:33, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support. James F. (talk) 19:46, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support Really beautiful and illustrative of the subject at the same time. --Tysto 03:39, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support —Christiaan 00:08, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --fir0002 12:06, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

Just for info: there is also Image:Maulringschluessel-1.jpg, but I think one of them as featured picture candidate is enough. --Avatar 13:02, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

• oppose very clear,but black background is better.--Smartneddy 07:11, 2005 May 11 (UTC)
• Support--Shizhao 20:33, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support "Maulringschluessel" sure is a mouth full for wrentch ;-) --Quasipalm 04:01, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose => featured norro 11:07, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:FirenzePonteVecchioDetail.jpg, not featured

• Nominate and Support I know it's not perfect but i like it :-) --Civvi 21:02, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose maybe it would look better in sunlight, but like this it's too bland. Dori | Talk 02:59, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose I tried to make a shot of it, too. It's really hard norro 12:16, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Nice pic, but I recommend some contrast and clarity enhancement. --Tysto 03:37, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose i agree with Tysto, Tbc 20:29, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose => not featured norro 11:10, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Wild rabbit US 2.jpg, not featured

• Shameless self nomination (one thing I could find wrong with it is with the earth patch, but I'd like to see how others feel). Dori | Talk 03:06, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - I would like to see the rabbit more close. Andreas Tille 05:40, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Ack. Andreas Tille norro 12:15, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  Have you seen the high res? I could crop it I suppose if it would help. Dori | Talk 13:29, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I would definitely crop it drastically in any case but then the resolution would be to low for a featured picture. For this you should be able to see single hairs. Andreas Tille 12:52, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Neutral For kicks, I cloned some more grass for the wascally wabbit. Wild_rabbit_US.jpg --Tysto 03:26, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose WεFt 09:48, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Fabien1309 17:15, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Tbc 20:26, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose--Shizhao 20:33, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured norro 11:12, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Henry Vilas Zoo IMG 2407.jpg, not featured

• Another shameless self nomination (I really like these birds' colors) Dori | Talk 03:08, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - Either the pair more closely or a "complete" group of three. Andreas Tille 05:53, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Ack. Andreas Tille norro 12:15, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral For kicks, I PSed out the oddball and racheted up the contrast and saturation. Henry_Vilas_Zoo_parrots.jpg --Tysto 03:23, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose WεFt 09:48, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Tbc 20:29, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose--Shizhao 20:32, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 0 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured norro 11:15, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Lichtenstein.jpg, featured

• Selfnomination - It was nominated by sombody else at English WikiPedia so why not nominating it here? Andreas Tille 05:36, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support LoopZilla 09:04, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support —FoeNyx 11:35, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Quistnix 11:39, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support Yes, why not nominating it here. It's really excellent! norro 12:14, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• support - tsca 13:16, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support here too. James F. (talk) 19:46, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Uwe Hermann 20:01, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Fanghong 02:25, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral high res looks blurred, out of focus (Do people look at the real image, I'm getting the feeling that just the thumb is looked at?) Dori | Talk 02:37, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral Very nice image indeed. There seems to be a problem with cromatic aberration (look at the edges. Not the Autor is to blame for this, it is a problem of the used lens. --Ulenspiegel 10:30, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Weak support Beautiful shot; a little unsharp filter would help this nicely. --Tysto 03:03, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Because I've seen the Castle a couple of times in real life and it never looked this good --Flammdingo 16:08, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support (perhaps indeed some sharpness issues on top for instance) David.Monniaux 06:46, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Lviatour 11:06, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral => featured norro 11:17, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Yft.jpg, not featured

Yuquan hill pagoda in Beijing, China

• Nominate and Support--Fanghong 03:23, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Nice pic, but not very high resolution. --Tysto 02:57, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose kind of washed out. Peregrine981 04:18, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose maybe it would look better if the sky were clear and with better visibility. Bogdan 17:09, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose WεFt 09:48, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
• support grey sky is natural--Smartneddy 07:14, 2005 May 11 (UTC)
• Oppose--Shizhao 20:32, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose, colors, composition --Thomas G. Graf 18:12, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• weak support. Nice pic. Unfortunately it's a bit grey...
  Pabix &; 15:25, 15 May 2005 (UTC)

Modified photo, is it better? --Yongxinge 08:58, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 6 oppose => not featured norro 13:30, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Cincinnati-roebling-suspension-bridge.jpg, featured

• Nominate and Support --Tysto 02:35, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support I like it. -guety 03:09, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support. Slight blurring to the lower-right, but I think that that adds to the effect. James F. (talk) 12:18, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support. Beautiful image and at the same time an excellent illustration. Fg2 13:28, May 1, 2005 (UTC)
• Support LoopZilla 09:00, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Cool --fir0002 12:06, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support very nice lighting --Avatar 13:37, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support FoeNyx 15:03, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Lviatour 11:05, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Tbc 20:14, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose >= featured

Image:Pilgrim Father Central Park NYC.jpg, not featured

• Nominate and Support --Urban 06:38, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral/Support. Very nice pic. The monument itself (head) has no optimal lighting. --Avatar 13:40, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose The monument, which should be the central theme, is just an ornament. Lighting and viewpoint are putting it into the background -- Quistnix 16:17, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose The statue isn't in the centre of the pic. I also don't like the lighting. Bogdan 17:20, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose WεFt 09:48, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Yann 21:12, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose framing bothers me... nice though --Quasipalm 03:58, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose composition --Thomas G. Graf 18:14, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured norro 15:20, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Feeding_time.jpg, not featured

• Nominate LoopZilla 21:40, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Quasipalm 19:57, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose WεFt 09:49, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
• support many species in the photo:)--Smartneddy 07:17, 2005 May 11 (UTC)
• Oppose Tbc 20:30, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose--Shizhao 20:31, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Yann 21:14, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Richardfabi 11:37, 15 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose => not featured norro 15:22, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:AsimovOnThrone.png, featured

• Nominate and Support LoopZilla 10:09, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Avatar 13:41, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support norro 16:55, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose I don't like that there is a signature (Rowena), and it's sloping to the right enough to bother me. Dori | Talk 17:07, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Bogdan 17:18, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral The license has a contradiction, that should be settled. Thuresson 23:14, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Thuresson 07:04, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support FoeNyx 15:01, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Shizhao 20:31, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Quasipalm 03:57, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose => featured norro 15:45, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Lavigerie overview.jpg, not featured

• Self-Nomination : no vote - Fabien1309 11:20, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose norro 16:55, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - The fence on the right is distracting; also the visibility for distant objects isn't great. Bogdan 17:17, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose nothing special WεFt 09:49, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - really nice, but not special enough --Thomas G. Graf 18:16, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - nice but not FP for me Yongxinge 02:19, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 0 support, 5 oppose => not featured norro 14:26, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Common blue damselfly02.jpg, featured

• Support. Self Nom. --fir0002 11:56, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
• Weak support. Can we get more resolution please? David.Monniaux 13:11, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support norro 22:33, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support WεFt 09:49, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
• Weak support Really great shot, but higher res would be better still. --Tysto 00:57, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Unfortunately that is as high resolution as I have, as it was taken with a cheap little kodak. --fir0002 08:40, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• support - tsca ✉ 20:45, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
• support Peregrine981 03:42, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Fabien1309 17:18, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Fanghong 09:19, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Support Yongxinge 02:19, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose => featured norro 14:32, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Bourbon Coffee.jpg, not featured

• Nominate User: FCRebelo 01:01, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support David.Monniaux 06:48, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Dori | Talk 12:39, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support LoopZilla 20:37, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral Would be great without the shadow of the photographer -- Quistnix 00:14, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Tysto 00:55, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
• oppose --Richardfabi 10:55, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose. Great picture, but the shadow means it shouldn't be featured. Standards here are very high. --Zantastik 16:55, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - Shadows --Fabien1309 17:18, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose--Shizhao 20:31, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support the shadow doesn't kill it for me --Quasipalm 03:56, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Image:CoffeeFruitsShow.jpg (nominated below) is way better. AlbertCahalan 18:41, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Peregrine981 02:54, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Yongxinge 02:18, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 5 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured norro 14:38, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Moraine Lake by Lake Louise Alberta Canada.jpg, featured

• Nominate and Support --Quasipalm 05:37, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support David.Monniaux 06:47, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support That's brilliant norro 07:54, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support LoopZilla 08:54, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support. James F. (talk) 09:07, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support - Sure ! -- Fabien1309 15:09, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --FoeNyx 14:15, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Quistnix 00:16, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Support. Wonderful --Zantastik 16:59, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral On the left hill there is a stitch error.--Fanghong 01:12, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Lviatour 11:04, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Shizhao 20:31, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Yongxinge 02:35, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 12 support, 1 neutral => featured norro 14:44, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Rock life.jpg: featured

• Support LoopZilla 13:02, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Dori | Talk 13:17, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Would like to see more of the lizzard norro 16:26, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support - Lizzard is nice in his environment -- Fabien1309 10:09, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support ditto David.Monniaux 06:44, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support WεFt 09:05, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose--Shizhao 20:30, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --fir0002 00:45, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Yongxinge 02:24, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

6 Support - 3 Oppose -> Featured -- Fabien1309 22:42, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Harrow-on-the-Hill2004.jpg, not featured

• Nominate LoopZilla 09:19, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose this picture badly needs cropping at the bottom - Quistnix 09:30, 5 May 2005 (UTC)

No way. The expanse of concrete shows distance and nicely leads up the the station. The cut-off light at the top however, is quite ugly. Cropping at the top might be nice, but the light pole would remain of course. AlbertCahalan 00:07, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

Agree about the light at the top, but the perspective at the bottom is not good enough imo -- Quistnix 12:33, 16 May 2005 (UTC)

• Oppose David.Monniaux 06:44, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose--Shizhao 20:29, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Yongxinge 02:21, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose. --Hautala 12:16, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 0 support, 5 oppose => not featured norro 16:10, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Harrow-on-the-Hill2004a.jpg, not featured

• Nominate LoopZilla 15:03, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Peregrine981 02:44, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose David.Monniaux 06:43, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Shizhao 20:30, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose -- Yongxinge which had forgotten to write his nickname
• support -- Pabix
• Oppose. --Hautala 12:16, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose => not featured norro 16:10, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:LotusBud0048a.jpg, featured

• Nominate and Support WεFt 09:40, 5 May 2005 (UTC) there is another version Image:LotusBud0048b.jpg
• Support LoopZilla 15:57, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Absolutely beautiful. --Tysto 00:52, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Peregrine981 02:45, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support David.Monniaux 06:44, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support FoeNyx 15:02, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Nice and clean Dori | Talk 17:41, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Fanghong 01:15, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support - Very clean -- Fabien1309 17:20, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Tbc 20:25, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Shizhao 20:29, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --fir0002 00:44, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• support the second version
  Pabix &; 15:31, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Yongxinge 02:21, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose. Ought to be cropped a bit. --Hautala 12:18, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose => featured norro 16:13, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Hoek van holland vuurtoren.jpg, not featured

• Nominate -- Quistnix 23:59, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Uh...oh, it's a sheep! --Tysto 00:51, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Peregrine981 02:46, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose norro 07:59, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support WεFt 09:05, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Dori | Talk 17:40, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Shizhao 20:29, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Greudin
• Oppose not excellent. --Avatar 14:12, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose. --Hautala 12:19, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose => not featured norro 16:25, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Japanfukuokabikes.JPG, not featured

• Nominate and Support: Not just a great photo (if a tad too contrasty, I think), but a resolution good enough to print full size. -- Oarih 07:04, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose blur --Fanghong 07:20, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support LoopZilla 08:41, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Grainy Dori | Talk 17:50, 7 May 2005 (UTC)

  Maybe it's an unfair comparison, but I'm a bit curious why a photo like this is being opposed on account of it being blurry or grainy - when blown up to full resolution - whereas yesterday's Tokyo by night photo was at an incredibly low resolution (for which Japanfukuokabies wouldn't be blurry or grainy) and even today's banana picture is very low-res and nevertheless exhibits some nasty jpeg artefacts and digital camera chromatic abberation. -- Oarih 04:12, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

  I haven't voted for either of those (and I would oppose them as well). Dori | Talk 05:37, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

  Right, well, fair enough :) -- Oarih 06:53, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

  Hi, please note, that there's no connection between the "picture of the day" (the tokyo and the banana image) and the "featured pictures". Both are no featured pictures norro 11:28, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

(somewhat offtopic) Something that annoys me is when we refuse high-res pictures on grounds that they are slightly "blurry" but we accept low-res pictures. A slightly blurry high-res picture can be converted to a sharp low-res picture. David.Monniaux 06:06, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

Yes, that's why the best looking version should be submitted I guess. Dori | Talk 04:19, 11 May 2005 (UTC)

• Oppose--Shizhao 20:28, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Yann 21:17, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Greudin
• Support Spundun 21:17, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Yongxinge 02:35, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose. Grainy. Resolution ought to be decreased to sharpen it. --Hautala 12:20, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support - Twice25 22:44, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support my own photo Peregrine981 00:23, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support -Malene Thyssen 18:43, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 8 support, 5 oppose => not featured norro 11:29, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:King's_Fog.jpg, not featured

• Nominate and Support LoopZilla 08:48, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose norro 11:17, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Dori | Talk 17:39, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose--Shizhao 20:28, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• oppose too much blue
  Pabix &; 15:35, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose. --Hautala 12:22, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Malene Thyssen 18:45, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose => not featured norro 11:30, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Strucla sweet bread02.jpg, featured

• Support. Self Nom. --fir0002 08:47, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support WεFt 09:07, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support LoopZilla 09:26, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support norro 11:16, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Bread not shown in its entirety, low depth of field. David.Monniaux 13:54, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose What you can see is pretty good, but you can't see much. Dori | Talk 17:38, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Very illustrative and textured. Peregrine981 14:42, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- low depth of field is annoying ... but very illustrative --Fabien1309 17:23, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Shizhao 20:28, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support-- Za 12:02, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose. "Low depth of field", me too. --Hautala 14:34, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Malene Thyssen 18:47, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 9 support, 3 oppose => featured norro 11:31, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Osmia_rufa_couple_(aka).jpg, featured

• Nominate and Support norro 15:00, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Dori | Talk 17:37, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Luis Fernández García 23:17, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support —FoeNyx 17:35, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Lviatour 11:02, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• support - tsca ✉ 13:57, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral - Very good photo, but I'm not sure, if everyone will be happy seeing insects having sex on the front site of Commons :-) --Mateusza 17:25, 15 May 2005 (UTC)

  Hi, the photo on the mainpage is the "picture of the day". That's something different. norro 23:02, 15 May 2005 (UTC)

• Support Greudin
• Support Aoineko
• Support. --Hautala 14:35, 21 May 2005 (UTC)~
• Support --Malene Thyssen 18:48, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral => featured norro 11:34, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Phalaenopsis (aka).jpg, featured

• Nominate and support David.Monniaux 17:54, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral Pretty good shot, but the removal of the background really bothers me Dori | Talk 18:19, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support —FoeNyx 17:34, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support - Sharp and clean -- Fabien1309 17:23, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Greudin
• Neutral should be better Yongxinge 02:37, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral awesome detail, but I don't like the remove background either Peregrine981 08:12, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support IMHO removing the background is exactly the right thing for an encyclopedia Andreas Tille 14:26, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose. --Hautala 14:35, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Malene Thyssen 18:51, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 3 neutral => featured norro 11:38, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Euston_Tower_2004.jpg, featured

• Nominate and Support LoopZilla 19:57, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Wow, you can't even tell that it was stitched. Dori | Talk 20:06, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Tepid support Would be better if purple fringing/chromatic abberation were cleaned up on the leaves, though. -- Oarih 07:00, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support. James F. (talk) 14:17, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Fanghong 01:32, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support aka Dori --Fabien1309 17:25, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Shizhao 20:27, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Quasipalm 03:54, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose. Sorry, but I hate this perspective for buildings. --Hautala 14:37, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Malene Thyssen 18:54, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose => featured norro 11:41, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Sewing machine singer symphonie 300.jpg, not featured

A Singer Symphonie 300

• Nominate and support David.Monniaux 20:33, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose this picture could be good with any other colour background -- Quistnix 22:54, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose norro 22:10, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - Background --Fabien1309 17:25, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose--Shizhao 20:27, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose. "Background", me too. --Hautala 14:37, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Malene Thyssen 18:56, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

Not featured. Dbenbenn 03:24, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Schloss Schoenbrunn Gloriette DSC02028.JPG, featured

Shameless self-nomination. David.Monniaux 21:01, 7 May 2005 (UTC)

• Support -- Quistnix 23:47, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support LoopZilla 08:23, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support, lovely - but about 0.1° off absolutely perfect lineup. :-) James F. (talk) 14:23, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Fabien1309 11:47, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support —FoeNyx 17:35, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support WεFt 18:47, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
• support - tsca ✉ 13:58, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• support--Shizhao 20:27, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• support
  Pabix &; 15:37, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Greudin
• SupportLviatour 14:20, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support. --Hautala 14:38, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral nice but is it tilting a little bit? --Malene Thyssen 18:58, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

Featured. Dbenbenn 21:35, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Moai Rano raraku.jpg, featured

• Nominate and Support. kahusi - (Talk) 13:51, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support norro 16:06, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Fabien1309 19:56, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support LoopZilla 07:45, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support —FoeNyx 17:37, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support WεFt 18:46, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
• Weak support First, is the first dark color of the stones natural? (I don't know the site.) Second, could we get more resolution? This is probably extracted from a higher resolution image, isn't it? David.Monniaux 06:07, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Quistnix 11:54, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Shizhao 20:27, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Mateusza 17:22, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Greudin
• Support--Chun-hian 16:58, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Yongxinge 02:16, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Get_It • 23:02, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Aoineko
• Support. --Hautala 14:40, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Malene Thyssen 19:00, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Helix84 00:37, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose => featured Peregrine981 04:06, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Pyranha Pygocentrus piraya group 1280.jpg, not featured

• Nominate / Suport: very nice picture. -- Duesentrieb 15:30, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Dori | Talk 18:08, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose LoopZilla 07:46, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Very very green... I realize this is an aquarium, but it seems everything, including the fish, is green... David.Monniaux 06:08, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
• support I think the surface is necessary,better than the next.--Smartneddy 07:19, 2005 May 11 (UTC)

I touched up the thing:

• Oppose--Shizhao 20:26, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Greudin

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose =>not featured Peregrine981 04:28, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Maybe I should put in some more blue, for the top of the fish? David.Monniaux 06:22, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

Support for the later. —FoeNyx 15:26, 11 May 2005 (UTC)

• Oppose--Shizhao 20:26, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Greudin
• Support Okapi
• Oppose. --Hautala 14:41, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Weak support I would have cropped so that the two dark corners in the left part of the pic was removed. Like that the surface is visible. --Malene Thyssen 19:02, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose => not featured Peregrine981 04:28, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Gants_Hill_Underground.jpg, not featured

• Nominate and Support LoopZilla 20:31, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose norro 22:10, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support. James F. (talk) 20:57, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Dori | Talk 04:18, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose WεFt 21:47, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Greudin
• Oppose Yongxinge 02:12, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Malene Thyssen 19:04, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - Rex 16:25, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Helix84 00:38, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 7 oppose => not featured Peregrine981 04:41, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Kings_cross_tunnel.jpg, featured

• Nominate and Support LoopZilla 21:02, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Quistnix 11:57, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support. James F. (talk) 20:57, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Do you have one without any people in it? Dori | Talk 04:16, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Shizhao 20:26, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support WεFt 21:47, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Greudin
• Support People give the dimension of the tunnel. I like it.Pensiero 18:50, 17 May 2005 (CEST)
• Oppose nothing special Yongxinge 02:13, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose could be better, either needs more wow, or more life Peregrine981 08:15, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
  • How? Some people complain that there are people in it, it seems that you're complaining that there aren't enough... More "wow"? Want there to be a fireball expanding down the tunnel? James F. (talk) 13:28, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
    • Either the perspective should be more dramatic, more original, or more striking, the subject should be more unusual (longer or something), or, there should be more action within the tunnel, more foreground interest, so yes, more people. As I see it now, this is just another tunnel picture, which is nice enough, but not particularly notable in my eyes. Peregrine981 00:24, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
• Weak support great perspective, but a bit too yellow - like the people. --Malene Thyssen 19:05, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
•  Oppose norro 21:14, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 8 support, 4 oppose => featured Peregrine981 04:49, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Dog_retrieving_stick.jpg, not featured

• Nominate and Support LoopZilla 09:06, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Woof! Woof! Woof! David.Monniaux 21:55, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Nice pooch Dori | Talk 04:11, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Nothing special. Yann 21:16, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Quasipalm 03:52, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose WεFt 21:47, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Tbc 16:35, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Greudin
• Oppose - Nothing special -- Fabien1309 15:19, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose wateriness --Yongxinge 02:14, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose dog looks demented Peregrine981 08:17, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose would have cropped it different and removed the legs in the background. --Malene Thyssen 19:08, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - Rex 16:26, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 4 support, 9 oppose => not featured norro 16:01, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Ducks and poultry.jpg, not featured

• Support Self Nom. --fir0002 12:20, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose I love this pic, but I notice that the last duck is out of focus which is a serious flaw. Peregrine981 14:22, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Oh, i like the composition with the geese and the chickens in the background. It would be really excellent without the dark bird in the foreground. norro 14:32, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support - Enven with blur, I love it ! --Fabien1309 19:43, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose -- the geese are really nice, but there's some kind of out-of-focus partial duck in the foreground David.Monniaux 21:13, 11 May 2005 (UTC)

That is a turkey --fir0002 22:16, 11 May 2005 (UTC)

• Oppose--Shizhao 20:26, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose WεFt 21:47, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support I like the story in the pic, all three ducks should have been sharp though, but I can live with that :-). --Malene Thyssen 19:12, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - Rex 16:27, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 6 oppose => not featured

Image:SonyCenterAtNight.jpg, featured

• Selfnomination - It was nominated by sombody else at English WikiPedia so why not nominating it here? (Please read the information I provided there why I formerly hesitated to nominate it.) Andreas Tille 13:40, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support, even so. James F. (talk) 15:31, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Quasipalm 19:12, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Yann 20:49, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support David.Monniaux 21:40, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Lviatour 11:00, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Tbc 20:11, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Shizhao 20:25, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Quistnix 07:41, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support WεFt 21:48, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• support
  Pabix &; 15:40, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Greudin
• support,but cut the bottom half will better --Yongxinge 02:09, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support agree with Yongxinge. --Malene Thyssen 19:13, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support - Rex 00:12, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose => featured norro 16:08, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Merson LeHavre1929.jpg, not featured

This French stamp was surcharged during the philatelic exhibition at Le Havre, 1929. The exhibition lasted only a few days, so the stamp is quite rare.

• Nominate and Support Yann 19:58, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose--Shizhao 20:25, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Quasipalm 03:52, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose. Stamp not shown completely. See the information here -- Quistnix 07:43, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Fanghong 09:06, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose but support it with the postage stamp separation. Greudin
  • What do you mean ? Yann 13:05, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Malene Thyssen 19:14, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose => not featured norro 12:47, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Aldrin Apollo 11.jpg, featured

• Selfnomin... - Hahaha, ok, not really -- I've never been to the moon...
• Nominate and Support --Quasipalm 01:55, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support David.Monniaux 06:12, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support LoopZilla 08:13, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Shizhao 20:24, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--FoeNyx 20:51, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Why don't they go back and make more pictures like this? ;-) --Quistnix 07:44, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support WεFt 21:48, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Greudin
• Support of course --Avatar 17:01, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Malene Thyssen 19:15, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Fabien1309 23:44, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose => featured norro 12:12, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:AS8-13-2329.jpg, featured

• Nominate and Support --Quasipalm 01:58, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose--Shizhao 20:24, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Avatar 17:01, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Malene Thyssen 19:15, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Fabien1309 12:37, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - Rex 16:28, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support norro 12:16, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose => featured norro 12:46, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Berlin-b.jpg, not featured

Juggling on the Berlin Wall on 16 November 1989.

• Nominate and Support Yann 08:04, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose norro 16:13, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose--Shizhao 20:23, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Interesting photo Peregrine981 03:13, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Quasipalm 03:51, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support WεFt 21:48, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Dori | Talk 22:47, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Fabien1309 15:21, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Avatar 17:00, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support
  Pabix &; 05:49, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Malene Thyssen 19:16, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - Rex 16:29, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 6 support, 6 oppose => not featured norro 12:24, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Caldera_de_Taburiente_La_Palma.jpg, featured

Self Nom. -- Lviatour 11:36, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

• Support norro 16:12, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --FoeNyx 20:50, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Quasipalm 03:51, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Weak Oppose sorry, nice but nothing special WεFt 21:50, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support - Impressive -- Fabien1309 15:20, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support a caldeira is special.
  Pabix &; 05:50, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Malene Thyssen 19:18, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose This is not "Caldera de Taburiente". It´s a view of "Cumbre nueva" from "La Cumbrecita" in La Palma island.--Eleagnus 16:50, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

It is possible, it is this poster with the entry of the national park which my perhaps misled http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Poster_caldera_taburiente.jpg Luc Viatour 05:50, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 6 support, 2 oppose => featured norro 12:46, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

File:La Palma-observatory.jpg, not featured

Self Nom. -- Lviatour 11:36, 12 May 2005 (UTC) Normally, you're not supposed to vote on self-nominations, as far as I know. David.Monniaux 05:40, 14 May 2005 (UTC)

• Oppose--Shizhao 20:23, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Quasipalm 03:51, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Bad composition WεFt 21:49, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose A big shrub and little buildings. David.Monniaux 05:40, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose
  Pabix &; 15:42, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Yongxinge 02:06, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Malene Thyssen 19:19, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - I agree with WεFt - Rex 00:14, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 7 oppose => not featured norro 12:39, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:ONU Geneva mainroom.jpg, not featured

Plenary meeting of the World Summit for Information Society at UNO Geneva.

• Nominate and Support Yann 18:24, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose--Shizhao 20:22, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Moyogo 21:10, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Peregrine981 03:10, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Weak supportEr... I just fixed the link to the hi-res image. Do you people actually look at the full hi-res image or just the thumbnail before voting? (the heads etc. are not too detailed, but I realize that it would have needed a 6Mpixel camera with a good lens) David.Monniaux 05:36, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• weak support. I would like to be able to read the names of more countries.
  Pabix &; 15:45, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Malene Thyssen 19:20, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Fabien1309 12:39, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - Rex 00:15, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose => not featured norro 12:43, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Elysette_Namur_nuit_2005-03-19.jpg, featured

• Nominated by norro 18:29, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support norro 18:29, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Yann 21:18, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support. James F. (talk) 10:57, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support —FoeNyx 19:04, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support David.Monniaux 22:43, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support but maybe just a bit too dark.
  Pabix &; 15:46, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support User:Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 08:16, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Malene Thyssen 19:21, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - Rex 00:15, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose => featured norro 12:44, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Sushi7.jpg, not featured

• Nominated by norro 18:29, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support norro 18:29, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Quasipalm 03:51, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose The dish was cut off. --Fanghong 09:25, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose idem, bad perspective David.Monniaux 22:48, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Shizhao 15:08, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Avatar 16:59, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Yongxinge 02:01, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Bad arrangement of each pieces of sushi, cut-off dish, bad position of chopsticks, soy source in the cheap plastic tray and its comming up to the edge of the tray - in short, They are bad mannered. I do not like that the tissue paper seems like toilet paper. --Ananda 20:28, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose I don't think this picture is standard sushi... should be change filename.--Suisui 15:39, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Agree with Fanghong --Malene Thyssen 19:21, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - agree wirth Fanghong, otherwise I would have supported this nom. - Rex 00:17, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - bad composition Helix84 00:36, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 9 oppose => not featured -- Joolz 20:23, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Orthetrum cancellatum.jpg, featured

• Nominate and Support by Tbc 20:08, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support norro 20:57, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Yann 21:21, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Quasipalm 03:51, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support. James F. (talk) 10:57, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support - tsca ✉ 23:39, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support - Mateusza 17:19, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Avatar 16:59, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• SupportYongxinge 01:53, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Get_It • 23:03, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Malene Thyssen 19:22, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Fabien1309 12:40, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Luc Viatour 20:59, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose => featured -- Joolz 20:31, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Strawberry.jpg, not featured

strawberry

• Nominate and Support--Shizhao 20:15, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support, beautiful. Dbenbenn 20:27, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose AtelierJoly 22:39, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Quasipalm 03:51, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral very uneven lighting -- Quistnix 07:38, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose They are rotting. AlbertCahalan 00:28, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - Bad lighting -- Fabien1309 12:15, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Avatar 16:59, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• weak Support,the strawberry is not fresh --Yongxinge 01:52, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose dont like the composition --Malene Thyssen 19:23, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured -- Joolz 20:37, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Pinaster flow.jpg, not featured

Flower of Pinus bungeana

• Nominate and Support--Shizhao 20:15, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose. The trees in the background distract from the subject. Dbenbenn 20:28, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Ack. -- Quistnix 07:37, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support But main object is very clear.--Fanghong 09:15, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support (could've taken about 5% off the right though) AlbertCahalan 00:30, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose background --Avatar 16:58, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Background --Malene Thyssen 19:25, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - brightness and contrast not optimal - Rex 00:21, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 5 oppose => not featured -- Joolz 20:42, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Bolton Abbey 7.jpg, featured

• Nominate and Support. The stone walls at Bolton Abbey are still standing, though the stained glass and roof fell long ago. Self-nomination. Dbenbenn 20:21, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Shizhao 20:39, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• 'Support Yann 21:20, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Quasipalm 03:50, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support. James F. (talk) 10:57, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• support - tsca ✉ 23:40, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• oppose Peregrine981 06:11, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Greudin
• Support Pensiero 18:47, 17 May 2005 (CEST)
• Support --Avatar 16:58, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Yongxinge 01:46, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Malene Thyssen 19:27, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support - Rex 00:22, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Helix84 01:00, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose => featured -- Joolz 20:47, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:IceBlockNearJoekullsarlon.jpg, featured

• Selfnomination - if somebody wants to see the story how this was taken then do not miss this site :) Andreas Tille 05:15, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Shizhao 06:43, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support LoopZilla 07:19, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support-- Quistnix 07:36, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support wonderful - norro 09:48, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support. James F. (talk) 10:56, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support wonderful - Lviatour 11:52, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support David.Monniaux 16:54, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• support - tsca ✉ 23:40, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --fir0002 00:43, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support but be careful. The legend of your thumbnail was castle in Liechtenstein... A bit strange!
  Pabix &; 15:50, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Fabien1309 15:23, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Mateusza 21:21, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Yongxinge 12:09, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 08:32, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Get_It • 23:04, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Aoineko
• Support --Malene Thyssen 19:28, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support - Rex 16:30, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
• Hellyeah Helix84 00:59, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose => featured -- Joolz 21:03, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Museum_in_Docklands_at_night_2005-01-10.JPG, not featured

• Nominate and Support LoopZilla 07:15, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Too dark. Yann 11:06, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Tbc 20:06, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Avatar 16:56, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Malene Thyssen 19:28, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose => not featured -- Joolz 21:14, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Bolton Abbey 6.jpg, not featured

• Nominate and Support. Same shoot as Image:Bolton Abbey 7.jpg, already nominated. James F. (talk) 16:45, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• I prefer it to the other one. Still I don't like the perspective. Weak oppose David.Monniaux 19:53, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose too much cut norro 09:53, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Shizhao 15:07, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Avatar 16:56, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Agree with norro but like the perspective. --Malene Thyssen 19:30, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose => not featured -- Joolz 21:19, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Serov-Lenin proclaims Soviet power.jpg, featured

• Nominate and Support 140.107.71.148 21:19, 13 May 2005 (UTC) (oops, wasn't signed in, this was me --Quasipalm 01:19, 16 May 2005 (UTC))
• Support WεFt 21:51, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support norro 23:20, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support. James F. (talk) 09:40, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Powerfull. --fir0002 00:43, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Greudin
• Support Impressive! --Mateusza 21:20, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• strong Support --Avatar 16:57, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Joolz 00:15, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose => featured -- Joolz 21:24, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Hatiora ×graeseri flower.jpg, featured

• Nominate and Support --Quasipalm 21:22, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support WεFt 21:51, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support norro 09:53, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --fir0002 00:42, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Greudin
• Support --Mateusza 21:18, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Ananda 15:42, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose would like the big pink leaves to be sharp also. --Malene Thyssen 19:31, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - mostly unsharp - Rex 00:24, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose => featured -- Joolz 21:32, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:ARS_pawpaw.jpg, not featured

• Nominate and Support AlbertCahalan 01:54, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose very strong white highlight gives a bad impression David.Monniaux 07:28, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support because i think, that's the most excellent way to take a shot of that pawpaw-thing :) norro 23:17, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support WεFt 10:52, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose good pic, but weird side-lighting kinda throws me off --Quasipalm 01:08, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Shizhao 15:07, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Avatar 16:57, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose The lighting. --Malene Thyssen 19:32, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - twig is sharp, but fruit is not - Rex 00:25, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 4 Support, 5 Oppose => Not Featured Peregrine981 04:51, 29 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Prunus serrulata 2005 spring 025.jpg, Featured

• Self nomination --Kropsoq 03:59, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support I missed the bee at first -- very cool --Quasipalm 01:17, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Shizhao 15:07, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Avatar 16:57, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--FoeNyx 22:24, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support nice and sharp, would have cropped it differently though --Malene Thyssen 19:33, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - brightness - Rex 00:26, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 4 Support, 2 Oppose => Featured Peregrine981 05:01, 29 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:CoffeeFruitsShow.jpg not featured

• Nominate User:FCRebelo 11:02, 14 May 2005(UTC)
• Support (used for the Cookbook now) AlbertCahalan 18:37, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose norro 23:13, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Quasipalm 01:17, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Shizhao 15:06, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Avatar 16:55, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Malene Thyssen 19:34, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - unsharp - Rex 00:27, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 2 Support, 5 Oppose => Not Featured Peregrine981 05:02, 29 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Western wall jerusalem night.jpg, not featured

• Nominate and Support W?Ft 20:36, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Quasipalm 01:17, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Mateusza 21:17, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose bad composition norro 21:51, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Avatar 16:54, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose agree with norro. --Malene Thyssen 19:35, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - agree with norro too -- Fabien1309 12:42, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - bad composition, people blurry - Rex 00:28, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 3 Support, 5 Oppose => Not Featured Peregrine981 05:03, 29 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Macroglossum stellatarum.jpg, featured

• SelfNominate and Support --Snek01 23:16, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support norro 10:14, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support nice Tbc 20:14, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support David.Monniaux 20:17, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support freaky eye on that thing --Quasipalm 01:16, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Can anybody identify the flower? AlbertCahalan 03:36, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Fabien1309 15:25, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support this is a nice one! --Avatar 16:53, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Lviatour 12:49, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Get_It • 23:05, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Strong support - a truely happy pic. I love the light, the colors and the big eyes on that creature :-) --Malene Thyssen 19:36, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support - very nice, quiet background would have been even more impressive - Rex 00:29, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 12 Support, 0 Oppose => unanimously featured Peregrine981 11:27, 29 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Chicago Downtown Panorama.jpg, Featured

• Nominate and Support - Peregrine981 06:05, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support LoopZilla 09:16, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• support
  Pabix &; 15:52, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Mateusza 17:07, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Avatar 16:53, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Malene Thyssen 19:37, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - nice, but not special enough to be featured - Rex 00:32, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Urban 06:01, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Ei. --Hautala 13:24, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 7 Support, 2 Oppose => Featured Peregrine981 03:52, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:To_All_My_Friends.jpg, not featured

• Nominate and Support LoopZilla 09:11, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose cool pic though, not sure if it's FP for me though --Quasipalm 01:15, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Avatar 16:53, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose what is that?Yongxinge 01:44, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Malene Thyssen 19:38, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Ei. --Hautala 13:24, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 1 Support, 5 Oppose  => Not featured Peregrine981 04:01, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

•  Support (don't valid) --FML ^hi 23:16, 14 July 2005 (UTC) Sorry! I don't know that was finished. :(

Image:Siege-de-sarajevo-soldats-bosniaques.jpg, Featured

Two Bosnian soldiers hunting for Serbian sniper that fired and killed civilian woman (Sarajevo, 90s)

• Nominate and Support Greudin
• Support Yann
• Oppose bad angle, bad composition, bad light norro 23:04, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose is the guy at the top of the stairs smiling? --Quasipalm 01:15, 16 May 2005 (UTC)

  People often smile and even laugh when under horrid stress and seemingly unreal circumstances. People who can't do this will do what, collapse in tears and be a useless panicy wreak? AlbertCahalan 03:17, 16 May 2005 (UTC)

• Support AlbertCahalan 03:17, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Shizhao 15:05, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Avatar 16:52, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support. villy ♦ ✎ 18:36, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Malene Thyssen 19:38, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - unsharp, not so special - Rex 00:34, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Urban 06:01, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Ei. --Hautala 13:38, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 8 Support, 4 Oppose => Featured Peregrine981 04:04, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Catedral de Segovia.jpg, Featured

• Nominate and Support Peregrine981 12:35, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• support can we have better resolution? The lighting is excellent.
  Pabix &; 15:53, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Yann 18:45, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Greudin
• Support Tbc 20:16, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose better resolution and i'd support --Quasipalm 01:14, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• support - tsca ✉ 13:00, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• support--Shizhao 15:06, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• neutral better resolution is necessary --Avatar 16:43, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support no more resolution? Lviatour 13:00, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Malene Thyssen 19:39, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - nice, but resolution too low to be featured - Rex 00:35, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Helix84 01:01, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Don't like it norro 17:40, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
• Kyllä. --Hautala 13:40, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
• Contra -- Get_It • 13:43, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 10 Support, 3 Oppose, 1 neutral => Featured Picture Peregrine981 04:06, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

One little comment

Thanx in name of Óscar Ibáñez (the author of the picture) for the nomination and the votes of this picture. When I uploaded this picture I made it smaller because I had then the silly notion that it was a bit too big. I have just read the upper comments, asked the author for the original picture once again and I have replaced it. The original is maybe not much bigger but at least is bigger. :) --Piolinfax 13:09, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

Image:Enfants Du Rhone Lyon.jpg

• Nominate and Support.
  Pabix &; 16:00, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Nice picture, but resolution too low Yann 18:46, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose resolution Greudin
• Oppose Tbc 20:15, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - Dark, resolution -- Fabien1309 20:57, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose resolution --Quasipalm 01:14, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose resolution and colours --Mateusza 21:31, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose trop sombre et légèrement en biais -- Za 12:16, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose resolution --Avatar 16:42, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose resolution --Malene Thyssen 19:41, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - resolution, likely sharpened with computer - Rex 00:36, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Jcornelius 11:44, 29 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 1 Support, 11 Oppose => Not featured Peregrine981 04:08, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Sempervivum.jpg

• (self) Nominate --Mateusza
• Support WεFt 18:47, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose LoopZilla 20:14, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose lighting seems a little flat for FP --Quasipalm 01:14, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support AlbertCahalan 03:44, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Shizhao 15:06, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• weak Support --Avatar 16:43, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Yongxinge 01:42, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Malene Thyssen 19:41, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - not bright enough, wrong part of image is sharp - Rex 00:37, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 4 Support, 5 Oppose => Not featured Peregrine981 04:08, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Claude_Bernou_Carte_de_lAmerique_septentrionale.jpg, featured

• Nominate and Support Yann 18:57, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Med 19:05, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support WεFt 19:10, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support norro 23:05, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support interesting! --Quasipalm 01:13, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support. James F. (talk) 09:39, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Avatar 16:42, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Malene Thyssen 19:42, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Urban 06:02, 29 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 9 Support, 0 Oppose => Unanimously featured Peregrine981 04:09, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Kuh vor Windrädern.JPG, not featured

• Nominate and Support LoopZilla 20:12, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - Not bad, but not good enough for FP -- Fabien1309 20:56, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose - not good enough--Okapi 22:19, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral not ba
• Oppose norro 23:05, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Yann 23:46, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose framing isn't quite there for me --Quasipalm 01:11, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose framing too large Greudin
• Oppose No impact Yongxinge 12:05, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Avatar 16:41, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Malene Thyssen 19:43, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 1 Support, 9 Oppose, 1 neutral => not featured Peregrine981 04:11, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Midsummer bonfire closeup.jpg, featured

• Nominate and Support -- Fabien1309 20:54, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Nice, but 1) what is it? 2) not so good resolution. David.Monniaux 22:42, 15 May 2005 (UTC)

It's fire :) norro 23:06, 15 May 2005 (UTC)

Yes, but from where? A bonfire for a certain festivity? David.Monniaux 18:05, 16 May 2005 (UTC)

Actually, I took this photo - very nice surprise indeed to find it here :-). I do have a better resolution photo somewhere on my hard drive, should I just upload a bigger version with a different name and renominate? Anyway, it is a bonfire from midsummer festival here in Finland, I uploaded it for article combustion in Finnish wikipedia. --Janne Karaste 16:32, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

Yes, please do so! You're welcome! David.Monniaux 06:39, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

I think you can upload the picture with more resolution over this version. -- Fabien1309 23:49, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

Well, this version has 800px in the filename, so it would be confusing. David.Monniaux 06:39, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

Ok, I finally found the original and uploaded a better resolution version to Image:Midsummer_bonfire_closeup.jpg, didn't use the same filename because of that 800px in the original filename. Should it be renominated? --Janne Karaste 19:23, 28 May 2005 (UTC)

I changed the link and the thumbnail to the hi-res picture -- Fabien1309 15:29, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

*Oppose Nice picture, but better resolution needed. Yann 23:52, 15 May 2005 (UTC)

• Support Great! Yann 10:35, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose better resolution and i'd support --Quasipalm 01:11, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Shizhao 15:05, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• weak support resolution Greudin
• Oppose resulution --Avatar 16:41, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Weak oppose resolution (we regularly argue against hires photos for a slight blur, so low-res photos are clearly not acceptable) David.Monniaux 06:30, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• support how big do we need these pictures to be? Peregrine981 08:19, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
  • I would say at least 1600x1200 for a FP candidate, unless it is an old picture or a special event. Yann 12:25, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Malene Thyssen 19:43, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support - Rex 16:32, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 7 support, 3 oppose => featured -- Joolz 00:07, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Larus portrait.jpg, featured

• Nominate and Support -- Fabien1309 20:54, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support David.Monniaux 22:32, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support norro 23:05, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support wow --Quasipalm 01:10, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support LoopZilla 07:05, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support WεFt 10:33, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• support tsca ✉ 13:01, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• support Lviatour 08:48, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support. James F. (talk) 09:39, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• SupportYongxinge 12:04, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Za 12:18, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Avatar 16:40, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Chun-hian 17:05, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support very nice Tbc 20:36, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support FCRebelo 00:45, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Get_It • 23:07, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Pabix &; 05:54, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Mateusza 08:42, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Beautiful --Ananda 15:47, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Aoineko
• Support --Malene Thyssen 19:43, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support -- Joolz 23:58, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support - perfect - Rex 00:40, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Helix84 01:02, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 24 Support, 0 Oppose => Unanimously featured Peregrine981 03:04, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Ophrys tenthredinifera Mallorca 01.jpg, featured

• Nominate and Support I can't stop staring. --Quasipalm 01:30, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support LoopZilla 07:44, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support :) -- aka 07:50, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support WεFt 10:34, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support--Shizhao 14:54, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Amazing! --Mateusza 21:25, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Greudin
• Support --Avatar 16:40, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Yongxinge 01:35, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support Lviatour 12:58, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --Malene Thyssen 19:48, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support --BerndH 18:40, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
• Support - nice - Rex 00:40, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 13 Support, 0 Oppose => Featured Peregrine981 03:01, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:The_cat_without_a_name.jpg, Not Featured

• (self) Nominate (please suggest cropping if needed) Bodq 08:57, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose (cut ears) David.Monniaux 18:03, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose (sweet cat, but that's not enough) --Mateusza 21:30, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Greudin
• Oppose --Avatar 16:39, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Lviatour 12:59, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Malene Thyssen 19:48, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Jcornelius 11:48, 29 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 0 Support, 7 Oppose => Not Featured Peregrine981 03:05, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Tzk.jpg, Not Featured

• Nominate and Support --Shizhao 14:54, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose nice pic, but not FP for me --Quasipalm 17:32, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
  • What does FP mean?--Yongxinge 08:40, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Avatar 16:39, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose Lviatour 12:57, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose composition could be better Peregrine981 08:22, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Malene Thyssen 19:47, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 1 Support, 5 Oppose => Not Featured Peregrine981 03:06, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Ricciportrait.jpg, Not Featured

• Nominate and Support --Shizhao 15:00, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose -- reflection / uneven lighting at the top, should look more like this imho. --Quasipalm 17:34, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose reflection (probably museum lighting) David.Monniaux 17:56, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose (but great content - I like to have this in better quality as FP) --Avatar 16:39, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral Should use CPL Yongxinge 02:40, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
• Oppose --Malene Thyssen 19:48, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

Result: 1 Support, 4 Oppose, 1 neutral => Not Featured Peregrine981 03:09, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)