Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Hoboken Terminal

Hoboken Terminal, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2016 at 05:41:46 (UTC)

Hoboken Terminal at dawn
Hoboken Terminal at sunrise

Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Could be better, we have makro shoter with doing f/5.6-6.3 on same sensor, and now f/11 on panorama. --Mile (talk) 06:02, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@PetarM: Not sure I follow; are you saying the sharpness is suffering from the effects of diffraction? My reason for choosing f/11 was to slow the shutter speed, and in practice I find that it doesn't reduce resolution that much compared to f/5.6 or f/8, about the same amount as an extra ND filter that would have been required. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Mild Support, more or less per Mile: Both photos look great at full-page size and are a good achievement; the compositions are good; and the series is certainly valuable. At full size, I can respect your choice of how close to start noticeably decreasing focus. The sky looks smoggier than optimal in both pictures, but that might be because of choices you made; I can't tell. The blown lights bother me somewhat in the blue hour picture, especially on the clocktower, so I wonder whether it's worth playing with the levels at all. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support I really like The King's same-view-different-times sets. cart-Talk 07:53, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support As always. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:25, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Don't see why the daytime one was f/11 since the exposure isn't particularly long (1s) vs night-time at 10s. The daytime photo is rather soft. The nighttime one has a stitching error in the reflected lights. The clock is also blown, which is a shame. Would have preferred if both photos were aligned with each other better. -- Colin (talk) 20:57, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I checked the original frame, and that is actually how the reflected lights turned out. I noticed it myself while stitching, but I can't explain why it looks so strange. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:28, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Mild Support per others. INeverCry 00:40, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Mild support per Ikan. It's nice to see a picture shot on the New Jersey side of the Hudson showing a skyline other than Lower or Midtown Manhattan. Daniel Case (talk) 01:51, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 05:29, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:54, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:20, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
still Support sadly the clock face is totally overexposed, but because of the little part mateched to the total image size and the very good technic of the rest and the very nive composition I support the image(s). I know the difficulty of those very bright parts, they are to handle but it's a bit tricky. --Wladyslaw (talk) 10:41, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Question Sorry, what is the candidate ?--Jebulon (talk) 11:30, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not quite sure what you mean. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:29, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /INeverCry 22:26, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#United_States