Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Ruitjesbovist (Calvatia utriformis). 18-07-2023. (d.j.b) 03.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2023 at 16:24:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Lycoperdaceae
Info All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:24, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:24, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like this, but is there any way to get the same aspect ratio on both? (is a wider crop possible on the "before" photo?). — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:37, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your question. I don't think so, but I'll check it out. It is the exact same mushroom.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:53, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For the set, I'd just like to see the two photos be a bit more similar in shape. I may still support even if that's not possible, though. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:56, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I checked it in Lightroom, but unfortunately I can't make the photo wider. Sory.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Really good to me. Does the spider, or whatever it is, merit its own category? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: I don't know the subspecies of the spider, but I can add the general spider category.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:03, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~weak~~ Support Nice set and transformation but I agree with Rhododendrites it would be much better if both images had the same ratio. In case the first picture cannot be enlarged, then perhaps the second one could be slightly arranged. Currently the size of the subject seems bigger, the borders on both sides are wider and the top & bottom shorter. A bit mismatched -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:56, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:03, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I find the pair more harmonious now -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:41, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:52, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 16:18, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 19:31, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the set. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:10, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:21, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 15:18, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 15:59, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:35, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:32, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good idea for a valid set Poco a poco (talk) 12:03, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:49, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi#Family : Lycoperdaceae