Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Empis tesselata male (aka).jpg

File:Empis tesselata male (aka).jpg, not delisted edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2019 at 16:36:54

Info Very small, way below current insect FP standards (Original nomination)
Delist -- Tomer T (talk) 16:36, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Still a good picture, though. Should we be delisting good pictures because they're small? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:08, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Can we just stop with the constant stream of delist nominations please. This isn't our focus. -- Colin (talk) 17:27, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, If size is everything about FP, maybe we should operate a bot to automatically delist all images below 2MP, but IMHO it's not all about size. -- Eatcha (talk) 20:37, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Question did the rules allow smaller images back then? Seven Pandas (talk) 23:37, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Simply too small unfortunately. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:56, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:00, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I see no good reason to delist a good picture just because we no longer promote images of this size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:11, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think this is fine--Booth sift 00:21, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Hockei (talk) 20:06, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 21:42, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.--Vulp here 04:56, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per others above. Yann (talk) 09:36, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Definite keep Of course the resolution is small, but the fly is less than half an inch in size, and this means that a nearly 1 megapixel image with good sharpness is in fact pretty great detail. Of course it wouldn't pass today but honestly I think it probably should on the basis that the amount of detail captured is actually very high. Cmao20 (talk) 15:56, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No real reason for delist.--Jebulon (talk) 17:13, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:55, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 3 delist, 10 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. Boothsift 17:19, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]